Prospective Economic Evaluation Alongside the Telephone-Based Nurse-Delivered Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Postpartum Depression Trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Susanne Hay, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Paula Ravitz, Sophie Grigoriadis, Elise Maddalone, Dmitry Dukhovny, John Zupancic
{"title":"Prospective Economic Evaluation Alongside the Telephone-Based Nurse-Delivered Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Postpartum Depression Trial.","authors":"Susanne Hay, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Paula Ravitz, Sophie Grigoriadis, Elise Maddalone, Dmitry Dukhovny, John Zupancic","doi":"10.1055/a-2708-5194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a previously reported, multi-site, randomized controlled trial in women with postpartum depression (PPD), telephone-based, nurse-delivered, interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) compared with standard postpartum care showed a reduction of 24% in the incidence of PPD (Dennis et al, <i>British Journal of Psychiatry</i>, 2020). The economic implications of this therapy have not been explored. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT compared with standard postpartum care, using resource utilization data collected alongside the clinical study.We conducted a prospectively planned economic evaluation using patient-level data from the IPT trial, which enrolled 241 mothers with PPD. We considered costs from a societal perspective, measuring direct medical costs from study logs and secondary sources, as well as evaluating costs borne by the mother and family (including both medical and non-medical expenditures) and wage losses through questionnaires. We used a time horizon of 12 weeks post-randomization, corresponding to the endpoint of the clinical trial. Costs are reported in (2022) Canadian dollars.Patients in the IPT group had more phone calls with public health nurses external to those provided by the study protocol (IPT 73% versus control 55%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and fewer visits to psychiatrists (9% versus 22%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). However, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the cost categories or total societal expenditures (IPT group $6,653, control group $5,336, <i>p</i> = 0.234). When costs and effects were combined, the societal expenditure was $5,397 for each additional patient without PPD.Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT, as employed in this trial, showed no statistically significant differences in costs compared with standard care but resulted in improved clinical outcomes. Although associated with moderate uncertainty, the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness was well within the acceptable range for medical interventions in this population, and telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT should be considered for patients with PPD. · Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT is effective in treating PPD.. · We performed an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial of IPT, using patient-level data and considering costs from a societal perspective.. · Patients in the IPT group had more phone calls with public health nurses and fewer visits to psychiatrists, with overall similar costs between the two groups.. · The societal expenditure was $5,397 for each additional patient without PPD, which is well within the acceptable range for medical interventions in this population.. · Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT should be considered for cost-effective care of patients with PPD..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2708-5194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a previously reported, multi-site, randomized controlled trial in women with postpartum depression (PPD), telephone-based, nurse-delivered, interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) compared with standard postpartum care showed a reduction of 24% in the incidence of PPD (Dennis et al, British Journal of Psychiatry, 2020). The economic implications of this therapy have not been explored. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT compared with standard postpartum care, using resource utilization data collected alongside the clinical study.We conducted a prospectively planned economic evaluation using patient-level data from the IPT trial, which enrolled 241 mothers with PPD. We considered costs from a societal perspective, measuring direct medical costs from study logs and secondary sources, as well as evaluating costs borne by the mother and family (including both medical and non-medical expenditures) and wage losses through questionnaires. We used a time horizon of 12 weeks post-randomization, corresponding to the endpoint of the clinical trial. Costs are reported in (2022) Canadian dollars.Patients in the IPT group had more phone calls with public health nurses external to those provided by the study protocol (IPT 73% versus control 55%, p = 0.007) and fewer visits to psychiatrists (9% versus 22%, p = 0.008). However, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the cost categories or total societal expenditures (IPT group $6,653, control group $5,336, p = 0.234). When costs and effects were combined, the societal expenditure was $5,397 for each additional patient without PPD.Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT, as employed in this trial, showed no statistically significant differences in costs compared with standard care but resulted in improved clinical outcomes. Although associated with moderate uncertainty, the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness was well within the acceptable range for medical interventions in this population, and telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT should be considered for patients with PPD. · Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT is effective in treating PPD.. · We performed an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial of IPT, using patient-level data and considering costs from a societal perspective.. · Patients in the IPT group had more phone calls with public health nurses and fewer visits to psychiatrists, with overall similar costs between the two groups.. · The societal expenditure was $5,397 for each additional patient without PPD, which is well within the acceptable range for medical interventions in this population.. · Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT should be considered for cost-effective care of patients with PPD..

以电话为基础的护士人际心理治疗产后抑郁症试验的前瞻性经济评价。
在先前报道的一项针对产后抑郁症(PPD)女性的多地点随机对照试验中,与标准产后护理相比,电话、护士提供的人际心理治疗(IPT)显示,PPD的发病率降低了24% (Dennis et al, British Journal of Psychiatry, 2020)。这种疗法的经济意义尚未被探索。我们的目的是利用临床研究收集的资源利用数据,确定以电话为基础的、护士提供的IPT与标准产后护理相比的成本效益。我们使用IPT试验的患者水平数据进行了前瞻性计划经济评估,该试验招募了241名患有产后抑郁症的母亲。我们从社会角度考虑成本,从研究日志和二手来源衡量直接医疗成本,以及通过问卷调查评估母亲和家庭承担的成本(包括医疗和非医疗支出)和工资损失。我们使用随机化后12周的时间范围,与临床试验的终点相对应。费用以(2022)加元计算。IPT组患者与研究方案提供的公共卫生护士有更多的电话联系(IPT组为73%,对照组为55%,p = 0.007),更少的精神科医生就诊(9%对22%,p = 0.008)。然而,在任何成本类别或社会总支出(IPT组$6,653,对照组$5,336,p = 0.234)上没有统计学上的显著差异。当成本和效果相结合时,每增加一名无PPD患者的社会支出为5397美元。在本试验中,以电话为基础,由护士提供的IPT与标准治疗相比,在成本上没有统计学上的显著差异,但临床结果有所改善。虽然与中度不确定性相关,但由此产生的增量成本效益完全在该人群的医疗干预可接受范围内,对于PPD患者,应考虑以电话为基础,由护士提供的IPT。·以电话为基础,由护士提供的IPT治疗PPD是有效的。·我们使用患者层面的数据并从社会角度考虑成本,在IPT的随机对照试验的同时进行了经济评估。·IPT组的患者与公共卫生护士的电话通话更多,去看精神科医生的次数更少,两组之间的总体成本相似。·每增加一名非PPD患者的社会支出为5,397美元,这完全在该人群医疗干预的可接受范围内。·对于PPD患者,应考虑以电话为基础,由护士提供的IPT,以达到成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信