Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and respiratory complications after endoscopy: A Japanese nationwide cohort study.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hiroyuki Hisada, Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Yosuke Tsuji, Nobutake Yamamichi, Naomi Kakushima, Kazuya Okushin, Seiichi Yakabi, Chihiro Takeuchi, Daisuke Ohki, Hiroya Mizutani, Yuko Miura, Dai Kubota, Takeya Tsutsumi, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
{"title":"Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and respiratory complications after endoscopy: A Japanese nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Hiroyuki Hisada, Kazuhiko Ikeuchi, Yosuke Tsuji, Nobutake Yamamichi, Naomi Kakushima, Kazuya Okushin, Seiichi Yakabi, Chihiro Takeuchi, Daisuke Ohki, Hiroya Mizutani, Yuko Miura, Dai Kubota, Takeya Tsutsumi, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro","doi":"10.1111/dom.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>While discontinuation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) before esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is not universally mandated, safety concerns persist. Evidence remains insufficient for managing specific patient subgroups, particularly in Asian populations. We aimed to provide evidence for stratified risk assessment in a large Japanese cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This nationwide retrospective cohort study used the Japan Medical Data Center database. We performed 1:4 propensity score matching based on age, sex, insulin use, HbA1c level, chronic respiratory disease, and body mass index to compare patients with diabetes receiving GLP-1RAs (n = 3568) with non-users (n = 14 246). Respiratory and severe complications within 14 days post-EGD were assessed via logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GLP-1RA was not associated with an increased risk of overall (0.39% vs. 0.50%; odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.40; p = 0.41) or severe (0.11% vs. 0.077%; 1.45, 0.46-4.56; p = 0.52) respiratory complications. While no subgroup analysis reached statistical significance, numerical trends towards a higher risk were observed in new users (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 0.51-3.98) and patients with severe diabetes (OR 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RA was not associated with increased post-EGD respiratory complications, suggesting that routine discontinuation may be unnecessary for many stable, long-term users. However, our findings do not support a uniform conclusion of safety for all subgroups. The non-significant trends in new users and patients with severe diabetes warrant a cautious, individualised approach for these potentially vulnerable populations. Further research is needed to definitively clarify this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: While discontinuation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) before esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is not universally mandated, safety concerns persist. Evidence remains insufficient for managing specific patient subgroups, particularly in Asian populations. We aimed to provide evidence for stratified risk assessment in a large Japanese cohort.

Materials and methods: This nationwide retrospective cohort study used the Japan Medical Data Center database. We performed 1:4 propensity score matching based on age, sex, insulin use, HbA1c level, chronic respiratory disease, and body mass index to compare patients with diabetes receiving GLP-1RAs (n = 3568) with non-users (n = 14 246). Respiratory and severe complications within 14 days post-EGD were assessed via logistic regression.

Results: GLP-1RA was not associated with an increased risk of overall (0.39% vs. 0.50%; odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.40; p = 0.41) or severe (0.11% vs. 0.077%; 1.45, 0.46-4.56; p = 0.52) respiratory complications. While no subgroup analysis reached statistical significance, numerical trends towards a higher risk were observed in new users (OR 1.43; 95% CI, 0.51-3.98) and patients with severe diabetes (OR 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.52).

Conclusions: GLP-1RA was not associated with increased post-EGD respiratory complications, suggesting that routine discontinuation may be unnecessary for many stable, long-term users. However, our findings do not support a uniform conclusion of safety for all subgroups. The non-significant trends in new users and patients with severe diabetes warrant a cautious, individualised approach for these potentially vulnerable populations. Further research is needed to definitively clarify this risk.

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂和内窥镜后的呼吸并发症:一项日本全国队列研究。
目的:虽然在食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)前停用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)并不是普遍要求的,但安全性问题仍然存在。管理特定患者亚群的证据仍然不足,特别是在亚洲人群中。我们的目的是在一个大的日本队列中为分层风险评估提供证据。材料和方法:这项全国性的回顾性队列研究使用了日本医疗数据中心的数据库。我们基于年龄、性别、胰岛素使用、HbA1c水平、慢性呼吸系统疾病和体重指数进行1:4倾向评分匹配,比较接受GLP-1RAs治疗的糖尿病患者(n = 3568)和未接受GLP-1RAs治疗的糖尿病患者(n = 14246)。通过logistic回归评估egd后14天内的呼吸和严重并发症。结果:GLP-1RA与总体(0.39% vs. 0.50%;优势比[OR] 0.79, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.44-1.40; p = 0.41)或严重(0.11% vs. 0.077%; 1.45, 0.46-4.56; p = 0.52)呼吸并发症的风险增加无关。虽然没有亚组分析达到统计学意义,但在新用户(OR 1.43; 95% CI, 0.51-3.98)和严重糖尿病患者(OR 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.52)中观察到更高的数值趋势。结论:GLP-1RA与egd后呼吸并发症的增加无关,这表明对于许多稳定的长期使用者来说,常规停药可能是不必要的。然而,我们的研究结果并不支持对所有亚组安全性的统一结论。新用户和严重糖尿病患者的非显著趋势要求对这些潜在的弱势群体采取谨慎、个性化的方法。需要进一步的研究来明确地阐明这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信