Antibiotic therapy in necrotizing soft tissue infections: a narrative review of the greater Paris SURFAST consortium

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Caroline Charlier, Bérénice Souhail, Stéphane Dauger, Paul-Louis Woerther, Alexandre Bleibtreu, Marion Caseris, Olivier Chosidow, Chloé Bertolus, Camille Hua, Gentiane Monsel, Asmaa Tazi, Tomas Urbina, Benjamin Vérillaud, Philippe Montravers, Raphaël Lepeule, Nicolas de Prost
{"title":"Antibiotic therapy in necrotizing soft tissue infections: a narrative review of the greater Paris SURFAST consortium","authors":"Caroline Charlier, Bérénice Souhail, Stéphane Dauger, Paul-Louis Woerther, Alexandre Bleibtreu, Marion Caseris, Olivier Chosidow, Chloé Bertolus, Camille Hua, Gentiane Monsel, Asmaa Tazi, Tomas Urbina, Benjamin Vérillaud, Philippe Montravers, Raphaël Lepeule, Nicolas de Prost","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05664-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are uncommon, yet rapidly progressive and potentially fatal conditions. However, evidence-based guidance on antibiotic therapy remains limited. Current recommendations emphasize the need for broad-spectrum empirical coverage, including gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobes, and Streptococcus pyogenes when clinically indicated. We aimed at developing a practical, evidence-based framework for empirical antibiotic therapy in NSTIs. This narrative review is informed by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, without date restrictions. We propose a structured decision-making algorithm for empirical antibiotic selection in NSTIs, integrating key clinical parameters: infection site, healthcare-associated versus community-acquired origin, risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and signs of sepsis or septic shock. Alternative regimens are provided for patients with severe β-lactam allergies. Special considerations for immunocompromised and other vulnerable host populations are also addressed. This review offers clinicians a pragmatic, stepwise approach to antibiotic therapy in NSTIs, while identifying critical knowledge gaps and priorities for future research. ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05664-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are uncommon, yet rapidly progressive and potentially fatal conditions. However, evidence-based guidance on antibiotic therapy remains limited. Current recommendations emphasize the need for broad-spectrum empirical coverage, including gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobes, and Streptococcus pyogenes when clinically indicated. We aimed at developing a practical, evidence-based framework for empirical antibiotic therapy in NSTIs. This narrative review is informed by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, without date restrictions. We propose a structured decision-making algorithm for empirical antibiotic selection in NSTIs, integrating key clinical parameters: infection site, healthcare-associated versus community-acquired origin, risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and signs of sepsis or septic shock. Alternative regimens are provided for patients with severe β-lactam allergies. Special considerations for immunocompromised and other vulnerable host populations are also addressed. This review offers clinicians a pragmatic, stepwise approach to antibiotic therapy in NSTIs, while identifying critical knowledge gaps and priorities for future research.
坏死性软组织感染的抗生素治疗:大巴黎SURFAST联盟的叙述性回顾
坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)不常见,但进展迅速,可能致命。然而,基于证据的抗生素治疗指导仍然有限。目前的建议强调需要广谱的经验覆盖,包括临床指征的革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性、厌氧菌和化脓性链球菌。我们的目标是为NSTIs的经验性抗生素治疗开发一个实用的、基于证据的框架。这篇叙述性评论是通过PubMed的全面文献搜索得出的,没有日期限制。我们提出了一种结构化的决策算法,用于NSTIs的经验性抗生素选择,整合关键临床参数:感染部位,医疗保健相关与社区获得性来源,广谱产β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的危险因素,以及败血症或感染性休克的迹象。为严重β-内酰胺过敏的患者提供替代方案。还讨论了免疫功能低下和其他脆弱宿主人群的特殊考虑。这篇综述为临床医生提供了一种实用的、逐步的方法来治疗nsti中的抗生素,同时确定了未来研究的关键知识差距和优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信