Caroline Charlier, Bérénice Souhail, Stéphane Dauger, Paul-Louis Woerther, Alexandre Bleibtreu, Marion Caseris, Olivier Chosidow, Chloé Bertolus, Camille Hua, Gentiane Monsel, Asmaa Tazi, Tomas Urbina, Benjamin Vérillaud, Philippe Montravers, Raphaël Lepeule, Nicolas de Prost
{"title":"Antibiotic therapy in necrotizing soft tissue infections: a narrative review of the greater Paris SURFAST consortium","authors":"Caroline Charlier, Bérénice Souhail, Stéphane Dauger, Paul-Louis Woerther, Alexandre Bleibtreu, Marion Caseris, Olivier Chosidow, Chloé Bertolus, Camille Hua, Gentiane Monsel, Asmaa Tazi, Tomas Urbina, Benjamin Vérillaud, Philippe Montravers, Raphaël Lepeule, Nicolas de Prost","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05664-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are uncommon, yet rapidly progressive and potentially fatal conditions. However, evidence-based guidance on antibiotic therapy remains limited. Current recommendations emphasize the need for broad-spectrum empirical coverage, including gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobes, and Streptococcus pyogenes when clinically indicated. We aimed at developing a practical, evidence-based framework for empirical antibiotic therapy in NSTIs. This narrative review is informed by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, without date restrictions. We propose a structured decision-making algorithm for empirical antibiotic selection in NSTIs, integrating key clinical parameters: infection site, healthcare-associated versus community-acquired origin, risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and signs of sepsis or septic shock. Alternative regimens are provided for patients with severe β-lactam allergies. Special considerations for immunocompromised and other vulnerable host populations are also addressed. This review offers clinicians a pragmatic, stepwise approach to antibiotic therapy in NSTIs, while identifying critical knowledge gaps and priorities for future research. ","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05664-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are uncommon, yet rapidly progressive and potentially fatal conditions. However, evidence-based guidance on antibiotic therapy remains limited. Current recommendations emphasize the need for broad-spectrum empirical coverage, including gram-positive, gram-negative, anaerobes, and Streptococcus pyogenes when clinically indicated. We aimed at developing a practical, evidence-based framework for empirical antibiotic therapy in NSTIs. This narrative review is informed by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, without date restrictions. We propose a structured decision-making algorithm for empirical antibiotic selection in NSTIs, integrating key clinical parameters: infection site, healthcare-associated versus community-acquired origin, risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and signs of sepsis or septic shock. Alternative regimens are provided for patients with severe β-lactam allergies. Special considerations for immunocompromised and other vulnerable host populations are also addressed. This review offers clinicians a pragmatic, stepwise approach to antibiotic therapy in NSTIs, while identifying critical knowledge gaps and priorities for future research.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.