Legal Status Categorization, Transitions, Starting Points as Employment Stratifying Mechanisms: Evidence from US Student-Migrant-Workers

IF 2.4 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Xiaochen Liang
{"title":"Legal Status Categorization, Transitions, Starting Points as Employment Stratifying Mechanisms: Evidence from US Student-Migrant-Workers","authors":"Xiaochen Liang","doi":"10.1177/01979183251381263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal status is increasingly recognized as a hierarchical axis of stratification shaping migrants’ access to employment and rights. The study reported herein examined how three facets of legal status—current categorization, transitions, and initial “starting points”—are associated with the employment conditions of student-migrant-workers (individuals who are on student visas and under post-graduation work permits). Using pooled National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG) data from 2015 to 2021, the analysis employed ordinary least squares and logistic regression models, supplemented by propensity score matching, to assess associations between these legal-status facets and annual earnings and four benefits: health insurance, pension plans, profit-sharing, and paid vacation. Findings show that current student-migrant-workers earned significantly less and had poorer benefit access than their comparable counterparts with temporary work visas, dependent visa, permanent residency, or naturalized citizenship. Transitions from student to other statuses (whether temporary, dependent, or permanent) are associated with improved employment conditions, though the extent varies by destination status. Even after becoming permanent, those who initially entered with student visas continued to earn less than those who initially entered with temporary work visas; this disparity narrows over time, but persists for decades. The study contributes evidence that legal-status categorization, transitions, and starting points operate as stratifying mechanisms of employment even among highly educated migrants.","PeriodicalId":48229,"journal":{"name":"International Migration Review","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183251381263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal status is increasingly recognized as a hierarchical axis of stratification shaping migrants’ access to employment and rights. The study reported herein examined how three facets of legal status—current categorization, transitions, and initial “starting points”—are associated with the employment conditions of student-migrant-workers (individuals who are on student visas and under post-graduation work permits). Using pooled National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG) data from 2015 to 2021, the analysis employed ordinary least squares and logistic regression models, supplemented by propensity score matching, to assess associations between these legal-status facets and annual earnings and four benefits: health insurance, pension plans, profit-sharing, and paid vacation. Findings show that current student-migrant-workers earned significantly less and had poorer benefit access than their comparable counterparts with temporary work visas, dependent visa, permanent residency, or naturalized citizenship. Transitions from student to other statuses (whether temporary, dependent, or permanent) are associated with improved employment conditions, though the extent varies by destination status. Even after becoming permanent, those who initially entered with student visas continued to earn less than those who initially entered with temporary work visas; this disparity narrows over time, but persists for decades. The study contributes evidence that legal-status categorization, transitions, and starting points operate as stratifying mechanisms of employment even among highly educated migrants.
法律地位分类、转变、就业分层机制的起点:来自美国学生移民工人的证据
人们日益认识到,法律地位是影响移民获得就业和权利的分层等级轴。本文报告的研究考察了法律地位的三个方面——当前分类、过渡和初始“起点”——如何与学生移民工人(持有学生签证和毕业后工作许可的个人)的就业条件相关联。利用2015年至2021年全国大学毕业生调查(NSCG)的汇总数据,分析采用普通最小二乘法和逻辑回归模型,辅以倾向得分匹配,评估这些法律地位方面与年收入和四种福利之间的关系:医疗保险、养老金计划、利润分享和带薪休假。研究结果表明,与持有临时工作签证、家属签证、永久居留权或入籍公民身份的同类相比,目前的学生移民工人的收入明显减少,获得福利的机会也更少。从学生到其他身份(无论是临时的、依赖的还是永久的)的转变与就业条件的改善有关,尽管程度因目的地身份而异。即使在成为永久居民后,那些最初持学生签证入境的人仍然比最初持临时工作签证入境的人挣得少;这种差距会随着时间的推移而缩小,但会持续几十年。该研究提供的证据表明,即使在受过高等教育的移民中,法律地位的分类、转变和起点也是就业的分层机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: International Migration Review is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects of sociodemographic, historical, economic, political, legislative and international migration. It is internationally regarded as the principal journal in the field facilitating study of international migration, ethnic group relations, and refugee movements. Through an interdisciplinary approach and from an international perspective, IMR provides the single most comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis and review of international population movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信