Nora E Rosenberg, Amber M Young, Yating Zou, Jessica Justman, Manhattan E Charurat, Sizulu Moyo, Khangelani Zuma, Linda-Gail Bekker, Lynda Stranix-Chibanda, Sam J Phiri, Nadia A Sam-Agudu, Marcel Yotebieng, Michael G Hudgens, Benjamin H Chi, Bonnie E Shook-Sa
{"title":"An HIV-1 risk assessment tool for men aged 15-59 years in 13 African countries: A pooled analysis of nationally representative surveys.","authors":"Nora E Rosenberg, Amber M Young, Yating Zou, Jessica Justman, Manhattan E Charurat, Sizulu Moyo, Khangelani Zuma, Linda-Gail Bekker, Lynda Stranix-Chibanda, Sam J Phiri, Nadia A Sam-Agudu, Marcel Yotebieng, Michael G Hudgens, Benjamin H Chi, Bonnie E Shook-Sa","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, approximately half of new HIV acquisitions occur among African adults. This analysis examines which African men are at highest risk of acquiring HIV-1 and in greatest need of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National population-based surveys from Eswatini, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The thirteen surveys were pooled and sampling weights were applied to represent all susceptible men aged 15-59 years-old. HIV-1 incidence was calculated based on a recent HIV-1 testing algorithm. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression model was fit with 28 variables to predict recent HIV-1. Models were trained and internally cross-validated to estimate area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Along the ROC curve, at sensitivity levels from 10%-90%, performance tradeoffs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 167,121 participants, 112 had recent HIV-1, representing 256,000 new annual infections among 122 million men. Only two variables were retained-reporting a male sexual partner and living in a subnational area where a high proportion of adults have detectable HIV-1 viremia. Overall AUC was 0.80 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.71-0.89); cross-validated AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87). At 10% sensitivity, 25,000 cases could be averted if 357,000 men adhered to PrEP (Number Needed to Treat [NNT]=14). At 90% sensitivity, 229,000 cases could be averted if 50 million men adhered to PrEP (NNT=219).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This predictive, parsimonious, generalizable risk assessment tool could help policymakers weigh tradeoffs between PrEP reach and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":520658,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Globally, approximately half of new HIV acquisitions occur among African adults. This analysis examines which African men are at highest risk of acquiring HIV-1 and in greatest need of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
Setting: National population-based surveys from Eswatini, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Methods: The thirteen surveys were pooled and sampling weights were applied to represent all susceptible men aged 15-59 years-old. HIV-1 incidence was calculated based on a recent HIV-1 testing algorithm. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression model was fit with 28 variables to predict recent HIV-1. Models were trained and internally cross-validated to estimate area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Along the ROC curve, at sensitivity levels from 10%-90%, performance tradeoffs were evaluated.
Results: Of 167,121 participants, 112 had recent HIV-1, representing 256,000 new annual infections among 122 million men. Only two variables were retained-reporting a male sexual partner and living in a subnational area where a high proportion of adults have detectable HIV-1 viremia. Overall AUC was 0.80 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.71-0.89); cross-validated AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87). At 10% sensitivity, 25,000 cases could be averted if 357,000 men adhered to PrEP (Number Needed to Treat [NNT]=14). At 90% sensitivity, 229,000 cases could be averted if 50 million men adhered to PrEP (NNT=219).
Conclusion: This predictive, parsimonious, generalizable risk assessment tool could help policymakers weigh tradeoffs between PrEP reach and efficiency.