{"title":"Postural coronal alignment shift after total knee arthroplasty diminishes with age and becomes negligible in elderly patients.","authors":"Komson Plangsiri, Bhumin Chotiwatanadilok, Pruk Chaiyakit, Pinkawas Kongmalai","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether patient age moderates the change in coronal hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment between supine and standing positions following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 113 consecutive patients after primary TKA for osteoarthritis underwent standardized full-length radiographs in both supine and standing positions. The postural shift (ΔHKA) was defined as standing minus supine alignment. Associations between age and ΔHKA were examined using a linear mixed-effects model with restricted cubic splines, adjusting for body mass index (BMI), sex, preoperative alignment and time since surgery. Equivalence testing (±1° margin) was performed in patients aged ≥60 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger patients demonstrated a standing varus drift of approximately 2-3°, whereas the effect progressively diminished with advancing age. The age-position interaction was significant (p = 0.011), while BMI, sex, preoperative alignment and time since surgery were not. In patients ≥60 years, the mean ΔHKA was -0.01° (90% confidence interval = -0.55° to +0.53°), meeting statistical equivalence to 0 (p = 0.008). Collateral ligament laxity on stress radiography showed no association with ΔHKA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postural coronal alignment change after TKA is strongly age dependent. Younger patients show a measurable varus drift, whereas older patients demonstrate negligible change within radiographic error. Age should be considered when tailoring intraoperative alignment strategies to ensure durable functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether patient age moderates the change in coronal hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment between supine and standing positions following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 113 consecutive patients after primary TKA for osteoarthritis underwent standardized full-length radiographs in both supine and standing positions. The postural shift (ΔHKA) was defined as standing minus supine alignment. Associations between age and ΔHKA were examined using a linear mixed-effects model with restricted cubic splines, adjusting for body mass index (BMI), sex, preoperative alignment and time since surgery. Equivalence testing (±1° margin) was performed in patients aged ≥60 years.
Results: Younger patients demonstrated a standing varus drift of approximately 2-3°, whereas the effect progressively diminished with advancing age. The age-position interaction was significant (p = 0.011), while BMI, sex, preoperative alignment and time since surgery were not. In patients ≥60 years, the mean ΔHKA was -0.01° (90% confidence interval = -0.55° to +0.53°), meeting statistical equivalence to 0 (p = 0.008). Collateral ligament laxity on stress radiography showed no association with ΔHKA.
Conclusion: Postural coronal alignment change after TKA is strongly age dependent. Younger patients show a measurable varus drift, whereas older patients demonstrate negligible change within radiographic error. Age should be considered when tailoring intraoperative alignment strategies to ensure durable functional outcomes.