Is Scaphoid Reconstruction Still an Option for Scaphoid Nonunion With Established Arthritis? A Retrospective Study of a Group of Patients.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Wenlong Zhu, Li Zhuo, Bin Li, Yuxiao Wang, Jeffrey Yao, Yang Guo
{"title":"Is Scaphoid Reconstruction Still an Option for Scaphoid Nonunion With Established Arthritis? A Retrospective Study of a Group of Patients.","authors":"Wenlong Zhu, Li Zhuo, Bin Li, Yuxiao Wang, Jeffrey Yao, Yang Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although many studies have supported salvage procedures as the best option for scaphoid nonunions with established arthritis, there remains uncertainty regarding when procedures to gain union are favored over salvage procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the short-term results from scaphoid nonunion with established arthritis treated by scaphoid reconstruction are acceptable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the clinical outcomes of scaphoid nonunions with established arthritis treated by scaphoid reconstruction between January 2019 and December 2021. Eighteen patients with wrist arthritis beyond Vender stage II were included. The median interval between injury and surgery was 50 months (range, 12-252 months). Fifteen patients were available for a 3-year minimum follow-up. Assessments included visual analog scale scores for pain, range of motion, grip strength, as well as the Modified Mayo Wrist Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of fractures healed at 8 weeks after surgery, and the rest healed before 12 weeks, as confirmed by computed tomography scan. At the 3-year minimum follow-up, average pain score, grip strength, and the Modified Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly compared with the preoperative values. The average active range of motion increased after surgery but was similar to the preoperative status. The range of motion or grip strength remained unchanged or even decreased after the surgery in three patients. At final follow-up, x-rays showed no obvious advancement of the wrist arthritis in any of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our group of patients with established wrist arthritis, scaphoid reconstruction resulted in acceptable short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although many studies have supported salvage procedures as the best option for scaphoid nonunions with established arthritis, there remains uncertainty regarding when procedures to gain union are favored over salvage procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the short-term results from scaphoid nonunion with established arthritis treated by scaphoid reconstruction are acceptable.

Methods: We retrospectively studied the clinical outcomes of scaphoid nonunions with established arthritis treated by scaphoid reconstruction between January 2019 and December 2021. Eighteen patients with wrist arthritis beyond Vender stage II were included. The median interval between injury and surgery was 50 months (range, 12-252 months). Fifteen patients were available for a 3-year minimum follow-up. Assessments included visual analog scale scores for pain, range of motion, grip strength, as well as the Modified Mayo Wrist Score.

Results: One-third of fractures healed at 8 weeks after surgery, and the rest healed before 12 weeks, as confirmed by computed tomography scan. At the 3-year minimum follow-up, average pain score, grip strength, and the Modified Mayo Wrist Score improved significantly compared with the preoperative values. The average active range of motion increased after surgery but was similar to the preoperative status. The range of motion or grip strength remained unchanged or even decreased after the surgery in three patients. At final follow-up, x-rays showed no obvious advancement of the wrist arthritis in any of the patients.

Conclusions: In our group of patients with established wrist arthritis, scaphoid reconstruction resulted in acceptable short-term outcomes.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

舟骨重建仍然是舟骨不连和关节炎的一种选择吗?一组患者的回顾性研究。
目的:尽管许多研究支持保留手术是治疗舟状骨不连并确定关节炎的最佳选择,但对于获得愈合的手术何时优于保留手术,仍然存在不确定性。本研究的目的是评估用舟状骨重建治疗舟状骨不连合并关节炎的短期疗效是否可接受。方法:回顾性研究2019年1月至2021年12月舟状骨重建治疗舟状骨不连合并关节炎的临床结果。18例超过Vender II期的腕关节炎患者被纳入研究。损伤和手术之间的中位间隔为50个月(范围12-252个月)。15例患者进行了至少3年的随访。评估包括疼痛、活动范围、握力以及改良梅奥手腕评分的视觉模拟评分。结果:1 / 3骨折在术后8周愈合,其余骨折在术后12周前愈合。在最少3年的随访中,与术前相比,平均疼痛评分、握力和改良梅奥手腕评分显著改善。手术后平均活动范围增加,但与术前相似。3例患者术后活动范围或握力保持不变甚至下降。在最后的随访中,x光片显示所有患者的手腕关节炎没有明显的进展。结论:在本组已确诊的腕关节炎患者中,舟状骨重建术可获得可接受的短期预后。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信