Thrombectomy for Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hong-Jie Jhou, Wei-Sheng Wang, Cho-Hao Lee, Li-Yu Yang, Po-Huang Chen
{"title":"Thrombectomy for Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Hong-Jie Jhou, Wei-Sheng Wang, Cho-Hao Lee, Li-Yu Yang, Po-Huang Chen","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.042299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 25% to 40% of all acute ischemic strokes result from distal medium vessel occlusions. However, the effectiveness and safety of thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusions remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted for randomized controlled trials published until February 2025. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes at 90 days (excellent, good, and favorable). The secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), any ICH, and mortality at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies involving 1246 patients with stroke with distal medium vessel occlusion were included (614 patients receiving thrombectomy; others with medical management). At 3 months, the odds ratio for an excellent functional outcome was 0.92 (95%, 0.72-1.17), for a good functional outcome was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.70-1.09), and for a favorable functional outcome was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10), indicating no significant difference between the 2 groups. However, thrombectomy was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhage, with an odds ratio of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.24-3.83) for symptomatic ICH and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.54-2.50) for any ICH. Mortality at 3 months was similar between the groups, with an odds ratio of 1.20 (95% CI, 0.85-1.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thrombectomy did not significantly improve functional outcomes or reduce mortality but increased symptomatic ICH and any ICH. Further recent randomized controlled trials are needed to define subgroups that may benefit.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251073344.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e042299"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.042299","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 25% to 40% of all acute ischemic strokes result from distal medium vessel occlusions. However, the effectiveness and safety of thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusions remain uncertain.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase was conducted for randomized controlled trials published until February 2025. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes at 90 days (excellent, good, and favorable). The secondary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), any ICH, and mortality at 90 days.

Results: Three studies involving 1246 patients with stroke with distal medium vessel occlusion were included (614 patients receiving thrombectomy; others with medical management). At 3 months, the odds ratio for an excellent functional outcome was 0.92 (95%, 0.72-1.17), for a good functional outcome was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.70-1.09), and for a favorable functional outcome was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10), indicating no significant difference between the 2 groups. However, thrombectomy was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhage, with an odds ratio of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.24-3.83) for symptomatic ICH and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.54-2.50) for any ICH. Mortality at 3 months was similar between the groups, with an odds ratio of 1.20 (95% CI, 0.85-1.70).

Conclusions: Thrombectomy did not significantly improve functional outcomes or reduce mortality but increased symptomatic ICH and any ICH. Further recent randomized controlled trials are needed to define subgroups that may benefit.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251073344.

远端中血管闭塞的血栓切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
背景:大约25%到40%的急性缺血性中风是由远端中血管闭塞引起的。然而,远端中血管闭塞取栓的有效性和安全性仍不确定。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane和Embase,检索2025年2月前发表的随机对照试验。主要结局是90天的功能结局(极好、良好和有利)。次要结局包括症状性颅内出血(ICH),任何ICH和90天死亡率。结果:纳入3项研究,共纳入1246例卒中中远端血管闭塞患者(614例接受取栓,其余患者接受内科治疗)。3个月时,良好功能预后的比值比为0.92(95%,0.72-1.17),良好功能预后的比值比为0.87 (95% CI, 0.70-1.09),良好功能预后的比值比为0.84 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10),两组间无显著差异。然而,取栓与出血风险升高相关,有症状的脑出血的比值比为2.18 (95% CI, 1.24-3.83),任何脑出血的比值比为1.96 (95% CI, 1.54-2.50)。3个月时两组死亡率相似,优势比为1.20 (95% CI, 0.85-1.70)。结论:取栓不能显著改善功能结局或降低死亡率,但会增加症状性脑出血和任何脑出血。需要近期进一步的随机对照试验来确定可能受益的亚组。注册:PROSPERO CRD420251073344。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信