Association between coping of the primary caregiver and the adolescent patient with cancer.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jaramillo Villanueva Leonel, Mario Enrique Rendón Macías, Ana Ríos Covian
{"title":"Association between coping of the primary caregiver and the adolescent patient with cancer.","authors":"Jaramillo Villanueva Leonel, Mario Enrique Rendón Macías, Ana Ríos Covian","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02965-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coping mechanisms help individuals face adversity, remain stable over time, and can be generalized to various circumstances. Two types are typically distinguished: the active style, aimed at resolving problems, and the passive style, focused on emotional regulation. We hypothesized that passive coping of the primary caregiver (hereafter, primary caregiver [PC]) would affect the adaptive coping of his or her adolescent child with cancer (hereafter, adolescent with cancer [AC]).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze coping styles in adolescents with cancer (ACs) and their primary caregivers (PCs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was an analytical cross-sectional study including 116 pairs of an adolescent with cancer (AC) and a primary caregiver (PC). The adolescents completed the Adolescent Coping Scale (ACS), applicable to those aged 9-17 years, while the caregivers completed the Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>49% (57/116) of the pairs both used the active coping style, and 14% showed the passive style in both members. No agreement was found between the coping styles of the AC and PC (Kappa = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.14, p = 0.13). The multivariate analysis explained 61% of the variance (Nagelkerke pseudo R2 = 0.61; likelihood ratio = 191.4; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Passive coping by the primary caregiver occurred with low frequency, and active coping was favored, similar to that of the adolescent with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02965-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coping mechanisms help individuals face adversity, remain stable over time, and can be generalized to various circumstances. Two types are typically distinguished: the active style, aimed at resolving problems, and the passive style, focused on emotional regulation. We hypothesized that passive coping of the primary caregiver (hereafter, primary caregiver [PC]) would affect the adaptive coping of his or her adolescent child with cancer (hereafter, adolescent with cancer [AC]).

Objective: To analyze coping styles in adolescents with cancer (ACs) and their primary caregivers (PCs).

Materials and methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study including 116 pairs of an adolescent with cancer (AC) and a primary caregiver (PC). The adolescents completed the Adolescent Coping Scale (ACS), applicable to those aged 9-17 years, while the caregivers completed the Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI).

Results: 49% (57/116) of the pairs both used the active coping style, and 14% showed the passive style in both members. No agreement was found between the coping styles of the AC and PC (Kappa = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.14, p = 0.13). The multivariate analysis explained 61% of the variance (Nagelkerke pseudo R2 = 0.61; likelihood ratio = 191.4; p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Passive coping by the primary caregiver occurred with low frequency, and active coping was favored, similar to that of the adolescent with cancer.

主要照顾者的应对与青少年癌症患者的关系。
背景:应对机制帮助个体面对逆境,在一段时间内保持稳定,并且可以推广到各种情况。有两种典型的类型:旨在解决问题的主动风格和专注于情绪调节的被动风格。我们假设主要照顾者(以下简称“主要照顾者”[PC])的被动应对会影响其患癌青少年子女(以下简称“患癌青少年”[AC])的适应性应对。目的:分析青少年癌症患者及其主要照顾者的应对方式。材料和方法:这是一项分析性横断面研究,包括116对患有癌症的青少年(AC)和主要照顾者(PC)。青少年完成适用于9-17岁青少年的青少年应对量表(ACS),照顾者完成应对策略量表(CSI)。结果:49%(57/116)的受访者均采用主动应对方式,14%的受访者均采用被动应对方式。AC组和PC组的应对方式没有一致性(Kappa = 0.15, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.13-0.14, p = 0.13)。多变量分析解释了61%的方差(Nagelkerke伪R2 = 0.61;似然比= 191.4;p = 0.003)。结论:初级照顾者被动应对的发生频率较低,倾向于主动应对,与青少年癌症患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信