The learning styles of graduating Canadian urology residents.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nicolas Vanin Moreno, Jasmine Dhatt, Naji J Touma
{"title":"The learning styles of graduating Canadian urology residents.","authors":"Nicolas Vanin Moreno, Jasmine Dhatt, Naji J Touma","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Kolb learning theory attributes differences in the way people learn with the way they perceive and process an experience, leading to uniquely different learning styles. Studied in other surgical disciplines, it has yet to be examined in a urology population. Identifying the learning style of urology residents may help in the development of teaching curricula that are best suited to knowledge and skill acquisition. The objective of this study was to characterize the learning styles of graduating Canadian urology residents attending the Queen's Urology Exam Skill Training (QUEST) examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Kolb Experiential Learning Profile (KELP) 4.0 questionnaire was administered to all graduating Canadian urological residents attending QUEST for the years 2021-24. Project participation was 100%. All participants received a report at the conclusion of the course. Participants' preferred learning phase (acting, thinking, reflecting, experiencing) and a specific learning style (deciding, analyzing, thinking, acting, initiating, balancing, reflecting, experiencing, imagining) were identified for all residents. Preferred learning phase and learning style were compared among years using the Chi-squared test (α=0.05). Preferred learning phase and learning style were compared amongst self-identified gender using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Graduates from 2021 (n=35), 2022 (n=29), 2023 (n=37), and 2024 (n=35) were included. In aggregate, the preferred learning phases among urology residents included thinking (38%, n=51), followed closely by acting (32%, n=44). A minority of urology residents preferred the reflecting (21%, n=28) and experiencing phase (10%, n=13). There were no significant differences year to year within an individual learning phase (p>0.05). In aggregate, the most common preferred learning styles included the deciding learning style (21%, n=29), followed by analyzing (15%, n=20), thinking (14%, n=19), acting (13%, n=18), and initiating (13%, n=18). Lesser common learning styles included balancing (11%, n=15), reflecting (7%, n=10), imagining (3%, n=4), and experiencing (2%, n=3). There were no significant differences year to year within an individual learning style (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between self-identified gender and preferred learning phase or style (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Graduating Canadian urology residents vary in their preferred learning styles, but the majority seem to learn by acting and thinking. A non-trivial number of learners displayed learning styles under-represented in surgical specialties. This lays the groundwork for future studies correlating learning style to exam performance and identifying predictors of successful completion of residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Kolb learning theory attributes differences in the way people learn with the way they perceive and process an experience, leading to uniquely different learning styles. Studied in other surgical disciplines, it has yet to be examined in a urology population. Identifying the learning style of urology residents may help in the development of teaching curricula that are best suited to knowledge and skill acquisition. The objective of this study was to characterize the learning styles of graduating Canadian urology residents attending the Queen's Urology Exam Skill Training (QUEST) examination.

Methods: The Kolb Experiential Learning Profile (KELP) 4.0 questionnaire was administered to all graduating Canadian urological residents attending QUEST for the years 2021-24. Project participation was 100%. All participants received a report at the conclusion of the course. Participants' preferred learning phase (acting, thinking, reflecting, experiencing) and a specific learning style (deciding, analyzing, thinking, acting, initiating, balancing, reflecting, experiencing, imagining) were identified for all residents. Preferred learning phase and learning style were compared among years using the Chi-squared test (α=0.05). Preferred learning phase and learning style were compared amongst self-identified gender using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test (α=0.05).

Results: Graduates from 2021 (n=35), 2022 (n=29), 2023 (n=37), and 2024 (n=35) were included. In aggregate, the preferred learning phases among urology residents included thinking (38%, n=51), followed closely by acting (32%, n=44). A minority of urology residents preferred the reflecting (21%, n=28) and experiencing phase (10%, n=13). There were no significant differences year to year within an individual learning phase (p>0.05). In aggregate, the most common preferred learning styles included the deciding learning style (21%, n=29), followed by analyzing (15%, n=20), thinking (14%, n=19), acting (13%, n=18), and initiating (13%, n=18). Lesser common learning styles included balancing (11%, n=15), reflecting (7%, n=10), imagining (3%, n=4), and experiencing (2%, n=3). There were no significant differences year to year within an individual learning style (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between self-identified gender and preferred learning phase or style (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Graduating Canadian urology residents vary in their preferred learning styles, but the majority seem to learn by acting and thinking. A non-trivial number of learners displayed learning styles under-represented in surgical specialties. This lays the groundwork for future studies correlating learning style to exam performance and identifying predictors of successful completion of residency.

加拿大泌尿外科住院医师毕业后的学习方式。
科尔布学习理论将人们学习方式的差异归因于他们感知和处理经验的方式,从而导致独特的不同学习风格。在其他外科学科中进行了研究,但尚未在泌尿科人群中进行检查。识别泌尿外科住院医师的学习风格可能有助于制定最适合知识和技能获取的教学课程。本研究的目的是描述参加皇后泌尿外科考试技能培训(QUEST)考试的加拿大泌尿外科毕业生的学习风格。方法:采用Kolb体验式学习问卷(KELP) 4.0对2021-24年所有参加QUEST的加拿大泌尿科毕业生进行问卷调查。项目参与率100%。所有参与者在课程结束时都收到了一份报告。确定了所有居民的首选学习阶段(行动、思考、反思、体验)和特定的学习风格(决定、分析、思考、行动、发起、平衡、反思、体验、想象)。采用卡方检验比较各年级学生偏好的学习阶段和学习风格(α=0.05)。采用Fisher-Freeman-Halton精确检验比较自我认同性别间偏好的学习阶段和学习风格(α=0.05)。结果:包括2021年(n=35)、2022年(n=29)、2023年(n=37)和2024年(n=35)的毕业生。总体而言,泌尿外科住院医师首选的学习阶段包括思考(38%,n=51),其次是行动(32%,n=44)。少数泌尿科住院医师倾向于反映期(21%,n=28)和体验期(10%,n=13)。在个体学习阶段,年度与年度之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。总的来说,最常见的首选学习风格包括决定学习风格(21%,n=29),其次是分析(15%,n=20),思考(14%,n=19),行动(13%,n=18)和发起(13%,n=18)。较不常见的学习方式包括平衡(11%,n=15)、反思(7%,n=10)、想象(3%,n=4)和体验(2%,n=3)。在个人学习风格方面,各年之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。自我认同性别与偏好学习阶段、学习风格差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:即将毕业的加拿大泌尿外科住院医师偏好的学习方式各不相同,但大多数人似乎通过行动和思考来学习。相当数量的学习者表现出在外科专业中未被充分代表的学习风格。这为未来研究学习风格与考试成绩之间的关系以及确定成功完成住院医师实习期的预测因素奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信