Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Andrew S Oseran, Rahul Aggarwal, Rishi K Wadhera
{"title":"Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare.","authors":"Andrew S Oseran, Rahul Aggarwal, Rishi K Wadhera","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States among Medicare beneficiaries, management of modifiable risk factors remains suboptimal. Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment has increased substantially; therefore, understanding the quality of cardiovascular risk factor management in MA is critical. In this study, we evaluated whether cardiovascular risk factor management was better among MA compared with traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked physical examination and laboratory data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2018) to Medicare enrollment data. We calculated age- and sex-standardized differences for treatment and control rates of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia among adults ≥65 years enrolled in MA compared with TM. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey weights were used to calculate nationally representative estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted study population included 45 426 712 adults (34.4% MA, 65.6% TM). The mean age was 72.9 years and 55.3% were female. MA beneficiaries were more likely to be female (58.5% versus 53.5%), less likely to be White (71.7% versus 81.7%), and more likely to have household incomes <100% poverty (11.4% versus 7.0%). Treatment rates for hypertension (82.3% versus 79.1%; SD, 3.4 percentage points [pp; 95% CI, -1.1 to 7.9]), hyperlipidemia (56.4% versus 56.0%; SD, 0.5 pp [95% CI, -5.7 to 6.8]), and diabetes (76.3% versus 82.5%; SD, -5.0 pp [95% CI, -13.1 to 3.1]) did not significantly differ between MA and TM beneficiaries. There were also no differences in control rates for hypertension (43.6% versus 46.1%; SD, -1.2 pp [95% CI, -8.8 to 6.4]), hyperlipidemia (51.5% versus 48.0%; SD, 4.0 pp [95% CI, -1.7 to 9.7]), and diabetes (61.5% versus 55.3%; SD, 4.4 pp [95% CI, -6.3 to 15.1]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the rapid rise in MA enrollment among individuals with cardiovascular risk factors and disease over the past decade, treatment and control rates for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were similar between MA and TM beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e012143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States among Medicare beneficiaries, management of modifiable risk factors remains suboptimal. Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment has increased substantially; therefore, understanding the quality of cardiovascular risk factor management in MA is critical. In this study, we evaluated whether cardiovascular risk factor management was better among MA compared with traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries.

Methods: We linked physical examination and laboratory data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2018) to Medicare enrollment data. We calculated age- and sex-standardized differences for treatment and control rates of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia among adults ≥65 years enrolled in MA compared with TM. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey weights were used to calculate nationally representative estimates.

Results: The weighted study population included 45 426 712 adults (34.4% MA, 65.6% TM). The mean age was 72.9 years and 55.3% were female. MA beneficiaries were more likely to be female (58.5% versus 53.5%), less likely to be White (71.7% versus 81.7%), and more likely to have household incomes <100% poverty (11.4% versus 7.0%). Treatment rates for hypertension (82.3% versus 79.1%; SD, 3.4 percentage points [pp; 95% CI, -1.1 to 7.9]), hyperlipidemia (56.4% versus 56.0%; SD, 0.5 pp [95% CI, -5.7 to 6.8]), and diabetes (76.3% versus 82.5%; SD, -5.0 pp [95% CI, -13.1 to 3.1]) did not significantly differ between MA and TM beneficiaries. There were also no differences in control rates for hypertension (43.6% versus 46.1%; SD, -1.2 pp [95% CI, -8.8 to 6.4]), hyperlipidemia (51.5% versus 48.0%; SD, 4.0 pp [95% CI, -1.7 to 9.7]), and diabetes (61.5% versus 55.3%; SD, 4.4 pp [95% CI, -6.3 to 15.1]).

Conclusions: Despite the rapid rise in MA enrollment among individuals with cardiovascular risk factors and disease over the past decade, treatment and control rates for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were similar between MA and TM beneficiaries.

医疗优势和传统医疗中的心血管危险因素管理。
背景:虽然心血管疾病是美国医疗保险受益人死亡的主要原因,但对可改变危险因素的管理仍然不够理想。医疗保险优惠计划(MA)的注册人数大幅增加;因此,了解MA患者心血管危险因素管理的质量至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了与传统医疗保险(TM)受益人相比,MA的心血管危险因素管理是否更好。方法:我们将全国健康与营养检查调查(2015-2018)的体检和实验室数据与医疗保险登记数据联系起来。与TM相比,我们计算了年龄和性别标准化的高血压、糖尿病和高脂血症治疗和控制率的差异。使用国家健康和营养检查调查的权重来计算具有全国代表性的估计数。结果:加权研究人群包括45 426 712名成年人(34.4% MA, 65.6% TM)。平均年龄72.9岁,女性55.3%。结论:尽管在过去十年中,有心血管危险因素和疾病的个体中,MA的入组率迅速上升,但在MA和TM的受益者中,高血压、糖尿病和高脂血症的治疗和控制率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信