Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Predicting Cisplatin Efficacy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Cancer Science Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1111/cas.70217
Yusuke Sugino, Xin Bao, Sho Sekito, Shiori Miyachi, Takumi Kageyama, Takeshi Sasaki, Kouhei Nishikawa, Toshio Tanaka, Manabu Kato, Yasuhito Shimada, Keishi Takano, Raku Son, Liqing Zang, Kenji Nakayama, Masatoshi Watanabe, Yasuhiro Murakawa, Takahiro Inoue
{"title":"Zebrafish Xenograft Model for Predicting Cisplatin Efficacy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Yusuke Sugino, Xin Bao, Sho Sekito, Shiori Miyachi, Takumi Kageyama, Takeshi Sasaki, Kouhei Nishikawa, Toshio Tanaka, Manabu Kato, Yasuhito Shimada, Keishi Takano, Raku Son, Liqing Zang, Kenji Nakayama, Masatoshi Watanabe, Yasuhiro Murakawa, Takahiro Inoue","doi":"10.1111/cas.70217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin (CDDP)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy. However, only about 40% of patients respond to NAC, and tools to predict individual responses remain limited. The zebrafish patient-derived xenograft (zPDX) model offers a rapid and cost-effective platform for functional drug testing, but its application to MIBC has not yet been established. In this study, we developed a zPDX model optimized for evaluating CDDP sensitivity using clinical bladder cancer specimens. This model was validated through three steps: (1) evaluation of CDDP response in zPDXs derived from cell lines, (2) comparison of drug responses between mouse PDX (mPDX) and zPDX models, and (3) correlation of zPDX responses with clinical outcomes. The robustness of step 1 was demonstrated through complementary assays, including temperature optimization, in vivo platinum quantification, fluorescent dye validation, Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE), and whole-mount immunofluorescence. An image-based platform for quantifying drug response by measuring fluorescent area was established and applied in steps 2 and 3. Step 2, using mPDXs, provided essential technical validation before applying the protocol to clinical samples. In step 3, patient-derived tumors were transplanted into zebrafish, allowing successful prediction of CDDP efficacy. Despite the small patient cohort, this study provides fundamental evidence supporting zPDX as a clinically relevant and experimentally validated tool for functional assessment of CDDP sensitivity in bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48943,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin (CDDP)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy. However, only about 40% of patients respond to NAC, and tools to predict individual responses remain limited. The zebrafish patient-derived xenograft (zPDX) model offers a rapid and cost-effective platform for functional drug testing, but its application to MIBC has not yet been established. In this study, we developed a zPDX model optimized for evaluating CDDP sensitivity using clinical bladder cancer specimens. This model was validated through three steps: (1) evaluation of CDDP response in zPDXs derived from cell lines, (2) comparison of drug responses between mouse PDX (mPDX) and zPDX models, and (3) correlation of zPDX responses with clinical outcomes. The robustness of step 1 was demonstrated through complementary assays, including temperature optimization, in vivo platinum quantification, fluorescent dye validation, Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE), and whole-mount immunofluorescence. An image-based platform for quantifying drug response by measuring fluorescent area was established and applied in steps 2 and 3. Step 2, using mPDXs, provided essential technical validation before applying the protocol to clinical samples. In step 3, patient-derived tumors were transplanted into zebrafish, allowing successful prediction of CDDP efficacy. Despite the small patient cohort, this study provides fundamental evidence supporting zPDX as a clinically relevant and experimentally validated tool for functional assessment of CDDP sensitivity in bladder cancer.

预测顺铂治疗肌肉浸润性膀胱癌疗效的斑马鱼异种移植模型。
肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的标准治疗是基于顺铂(CDDP)的新辅助化疗(NAC),然后是根治性膀胱切除术。然而,只有约40%的患者对NAC有反应,预测个体反应的工具仍然有限。斑马鱼患者来源的异种移植(zPDX)模型为功能药物测试提供了一个快速和经济的平台,但其在MIBC中的应用尚未建立。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个优化的zPDX模型,用于评估临床膀胱癌标本的CDDP敏感性。该模型通过三个步骤进行验证:(1)评估来自细胞系的zPDX对CDDP的反应,(2)比较小鼠PDX (mPDX)和zPDX模型的药物反应,(3)zPDX反应与临床结果的相关性。通过补充分析,包括温度优化、体内铂定量、荧光染料验证、基因表达的Cap分析(CAGE)和全载免疫荧光,验证了步骤1的稳健性。通过测量荧光面积建立了基于图像的药物反应定量平台,并应用于步骤2和步骤3。步骤2,使用mpdx,在将方案应用于临床样本之前提供必要的技术验证。在步骤3中,将患者来源的肿瘤移植到斑马鱼中,成功预测了CDDP的疗效。尽管患者队列较小,但本研究为支持zPDX作为膀胱癌CDDP敏感性功能评估的临床相关和实验验证工具提供了基础证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信