Appraisal of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 in Substance Use Disorder Research.

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q1 NURSING

Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000865

Mirinda B Tyo, Mary K McCurry

{"title":"Appraisal of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 in Substance Use Disorder Research.","authors":"Mirinda B Tyo, Mary K McCurry","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) research has shifted to focus on strength-based approaches and resilience. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CD-RISC-25) has been widely used to measure resilience in the general population, individuals with SUD, and individuals with mental health conditions. However, there is no globally accepted standard measure of resilience, and the lack of a consistent conceptual definition and limited psychometric information for instruments in SUD research publications, contributes to methodological challenges.Objective: The purpose of this study was to appraise the psychometric properties of the CD-RISC-25 and evaluate the scale's performance in SUD research using the Psychometric Reliability & Investigation of Research Instruments (PRIORI) rubric.Methods: Cochrane Rapid Review criteria were used to synthesize and evaluate 48 published peer-reviewed articles that used the CD-RISC-25 to measure resilience in individuals with SUD. The PRIORI rubric was used to appraise the articles for the conceptual definition of resilience, reliability, validity, results related to resilience, and performance of the CD-RISC-25.Results: Cronbach's alpha for the CD-RISC-25 in populations with SUD provided support for use of the measure among different populations with SUD. Most authors reported face validity; however, sufficient data were available in most publications to also support criterion and construct validity. Appraisal scores for the CD-RISC-25 used in populations with SUD suggested the CD-RISC-25 scale was a good measure of resilience.Discussion: The PRIORI rubric allowed researchers to critically appraise the performance of the CD-RISC-25 in the reviewed SUD research articles. Findings suggest the CD-RISC-25 was valid and reliable when used to measure resilience in diverse populations with SUD. Adopting the CD-RISC-25 as the gold standard measure of resilience could help address the methodological challenges identified in SUD research.","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) research has shifted to focus on strength-based approaches and resilience. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CD-RISC-25) has been widely used to measure resilience in the general population, individuals with SUD, and individuals with mental health conditions. However, there is no globally accepted standard measure of resilience, and the lack of a consistent conceptual definition and limited psychometric information for instruments in SUD research publications, contributes to methodological challenges.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to appraise the psychometric properties of the CD-RISC-25 and evaluate the scale's performance in SUD research using the Psychometric Reliability & Investigation of Research Instruments (PRIORI) rubric.

Methods: Cochrane Rapid Review criteria were used to synthesize and evaluate 48 published peer-reviewed articles that used the CD-RISC-25 to measure resilience in individuals with SUD. The PRIORI rubric was used to appraise the articles for the conceptual definition of resilience, reliability, validity, results related to resilience, and performance of the CD-RISC-25.

Results: Cronbach's alpha for the CD-RISC-25 in populations with SUD provided support for use of the measure among different populations with SUD. Most authors reported face validity; however, sufficient data were available in most publications to also support criterion and construct validity. Appraisal scores for the CD-RISC-25 used in populations with SUD suggested the CD-RISC-25 scale was a good measure of resilience.

Discussion: The PRIORI rubric allowed researchers to critically appraise the performance of the CD-RISC-25 in the reviewed SUD research articles. Findings suggest the CD-RISC-25 was valid and reliable when used to measure resilience in diverse populations with SUD. Adopting the CD-RISC-25 as the gold standard measure of resilience could help address the methodological challenges identified in SUD research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

康诺-戴维森弹性量表25在物质使用障碍研究中的评价。

背景：物质使用障碍（SUD）的研究已经转向关注基于力量的方法和恢复力。康诺-戴维森弹性量表-25 （CD-RISC-25）已被广泛用于测量普通人群的弹性，患有SUD的个体，以及有精神健康状况的个体。然而，目前还没有全球公认的弹性测量标准，并且在SUD研究出版物中缺乏一致的概念定义和有限的心理测量信息，这导致了方法学上的挑战。目的：本研究的目的是评估CD-RISC-25量表的心理测量特性，并使用研究工具的心理测量信度与调查（PRIORI）量表评估该量表在SUD研究中的表现。方法：采用Cochrane快速评价（Cochrane Rapid Review）标准对48篇已发表的同行评议文章进行综合评价，这些文章使用CD-RISC-25来测量SUD患者的恢复能力。PRIORI标题用于评估文章的弹性，信度，效度，与弹性相关的结果和CD-RISC-25的性能的概念定义。结果：CD-RISC-25在SUD人群中的Cronbach alpha值为在不同SUD人群中使用该指标提供了支持。大多数作者报告了面部效度；然而，在大多数出版物中也有足够的数据来支持标准和结构效度。在患有SUD的人群中使用的CD-RISC-25的评估分数表明CD-RISC-25量表是一种很好的弹性测量方法。讨论：PRIORI标题允许研究人员在审查的SUD研究文章中批判性地评估CD-RISC-25的性能。研究结果表明，CD-RISC-25在用于测量不同SUD人群的恢复能力时是有效和可靠的。采用CD-RISC-25作为弹性测量的黄金标准可以帮助解决SUD研究中确定的方法挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nursing Research 医学-护理

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

4.00%

发文量

102

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.