Oncological Outcomes of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Treated With Curative Intent: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
F E C Vande Kerckhove, A G J Aalbers, H C Groen, P Snaebjornsson, B van Triest, G L Beets, Brechtje A Grotenhuis
{"title":"Oncological Outcomes of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Treated With Curative Intent: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"F E C Vande Kerckhove, A G J Aalbers, H C Groen, P Snaebjornsson, B van Triest, G L Beets, Brechtje A Grotenhuis","doi":"10.1002/wjs.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment paradigms for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) have shifted from palliative approaches to multimodal curative-intent treatment in selected patients. This retrospective cohort study evaluates survival outcomes following curative-intent treatment in patients with LRRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with LRRC undergoing curative-intent treatment at a tertiary referral center between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed (n = 147). Overall survival (OS), local re-recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and prognostic factors were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>147 patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment with curative intent at baseline. After response assessment, 117/147 (80%) patients continued curative therapy, which consisted of 109/117 (93%) patients undergoing surgery and a highly selected group of 8/117 (7%) patients monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. For the remaining 30/147 patients (20%), treatment intent changed from curative to palliative. Median OS was 54 months with a 5-year OS of 47%. For patients treated with an overall curative intent (n = 117), median OS was 63 months with a 5-year OS of 58%. Clear resection margins, achieved in 76% of surgical cases, was a prognostic factor for OS and LRFS: 5-year OS was 66% for R0-resections and 33% for R1-resections (p < 0.001), and 3-year RFS was 69% for R0-resections and 50% for R1-resections (p < 0.001). Among the watch-and-wait group, 5/8 patients remained alive and disease-free (median follow-up 14 months (IQR 9-16)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study demonstrates reasonably good oncological outcomes following curative-intent LRRC treatment. Further investigation of watch-and-wait strategies in highly selected patients is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment paradigms for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) have shifted from palliative approaches to multimodal curative-intent treatment in selected patients. This retrospective cohort study evaluates survival outcomes following curative-intent treatment in patients with LRRC.

Methods: All consecutive patients with LRRC undergoing curative-intent treatment at a tertiary referral center between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed (n = 147). Overall survival (OS), local re-recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and prognostic factors were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

Results: 147 patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment with curative intent at baseline. After response assessment, 117/147 (80%) patients continued curative therapy, which consisted of 109/117 (93%) patients undergoing surgery and a highly selected group of 8/117 (7%) patients monitored with a watch-and-wait strategy. For the remaining 30/147 patients (20%), treatment intent changed from curative to palliative. Median OS was 54 months with a 5-year OS of 47%. For patients treated with an overall curative intent (n = 117), median OS was 63 months with a 5-year OS of 58%. Clear resection margins, achieved in 76% of surgical cases, was a prognostic factor for OS and LRFS: 5-year OS was 66% for R0-resections and 33% for R1-resections (p < 0.001), and 3-year RFS was 69% for R0-resections and 50% for R1-resections (p < 0.001). Among the watch-and-wait group, 5/8 patients remained alive and disease-free (median follow-up 14 months (IQR 9-16)).

Conclusions: This single-center retrospective cohort study demonstrates reasonably good oncological outcomes following curative-intent LRRC treatment. Further investigation of watch-and-wait strategies in highly selected patients is warranted.

局部复发直肠癌治疗的疗效:一项单中心回顾性队列研究
背景:局部复发直肠癌(LRRC)患者的治疗模式已经从姑息治疗转向多模式治疗。这项回顾性队列研究评估了LRRC患者接受治疗后的生存结果。方法:回顾性分析2014年至2024年在三级转诊中心接受治疗的所有连续LRRC患者(n = 147)。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析分析总生存期(OS)、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)、无转移生存期(MFS)和预后因素。结果:147例患者在基线时接受了新辅助治疗。在反应评估后,117/147(80%)患者继续接受治疗,其中109/117(93%)患者接受手术治疗,8/117(7%)患者接受观察和等待策略监测。其余30/147例(20%)患者的治疗意图由治愈性转变为姑息性。中位生存期为54个月,5年生存期为47%。对于以总体治愈意图治疗的患者(n = 117),中位OS为63个月,5年OS为58%。76%的手术病例切除边缘清晰,这是OS和LRFS的预后因素:r0切除的5年OS为66%,r1切除的5年OS为33%(结论:这项单中心回顾性队列研究表明,在治疗目的为LRRC治疗后,肿瘤预后相当良好。在高度选定的患者中进一步调查观察和等待策略是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信