APOSTEL-R Recommendations for Reporting Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Studies in Rodents.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frederike Cosima Oertel, Delia Cabrera Debuc, Peter A Calabresi, Mei Chen, Christian Cordano, Michael Dietrich, Nicolas Feltgen, Oliver Gramlich, Ari J Green, Janos Groh, Su-Chun Huang, Benjamin Knier, Thomas Korn, Letizia Leocani, Anat Loewenstein, Christian van Oterendorp, Tunde Peto, Sven Schippling, Leopold Schmetterer, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Mathias W Seeliger, Kenneth S Shindler, Joel S Schuman, Mustafa Sindi, Adnan Tufail, Jui-Kai Wang, Sebastian Wolf, Yuyi You, Martin Zinkernagel, Wolf Lagrèze, Philipp Albrecht
{"title":"APOSTEL-R Recommendations for Reporting Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Studies in Rodents.","authors":"Frederike Cosima Oertel, Delia Cabrera Debuc, Peter A Calabresi, Mei Chen, Christian Cordano, Michael Dietrich, Nicolas Feltgen, Oliver Gramlich, Ari J Green, Janos Groh, Su-Chun Huang, Benjamin Knier, Thomas Korn, Letizia Leocani, Anat Loewenstein, Christian van Oterendorp, Tunde Peto, Sven Schippling, Leopold Schmetterer, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Mathias W Seeliger, Kenneth S Shindler, Joel S Schuman, Mustafa Sindi, Adnan Tufail, Jui-Kai Wang, Sebastian Wolf, Yuyi You, Martin Zinkernagel, Wolf Lagrèze, Philipp Albrecht","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) in rodent models has been used to longitudinally image retinal changes, to define end points for more costly or time-consuming experiments, and to better understand the pathophysiology underlying OCT findings in human diseases. No standardization of rodent OCT reporting currently exists. Here, we aim to establish consensus recommendation for reporting results from retinal OCT studies in rodents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial recommendations were developed based on the APOSTEL criteria for quantitative OCT reporting in humans by a core team. Using a modified Delphi process, an expert panel of rodent OCT researchers (N = 31) and the wider scientific community discussed, refined, and voted on these initial recommendations. The list of recommendations was then revised and approved by the expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final 7-point checklist includes reporting recommendations regarding the study protocol, OCT device, acquisition settings and modifications, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection and image data analyses, and qualitative and quantitative results. With a median agreement score of 3 or 4 out of 4, the scientific community agreed with these recommendations. After revisions, the expert panel accepted the final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements for reporting OCT studies in rodents (APOSTEL-R) originates from an expert consensus. They will provide guidance throughout the experimental process and will contribute to the standardization and quality improvement of preclinical OCT studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 6","pages":"e200489"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) in rodent models has been used to longitudinally image retinal changes, to define end points for more costly or time-consuming experiments, and to better understand the pathophysiology underlying OCT findings in human diseases. No standardization of rodent OCT reporting currently exists. Here, we aim to establish consensus recommendation for reporting results from retinal OCT studies in rodents.

Methods: Initial recommendations were developed based on the APOSTEL criteria for quantitative OCT reporting in humans by a core team. Using a modified Delphi process, an expert panel of rodent OCT researchers (N = 31) and the wider scientific community discussed, refined, and voted on these initial recommendations. The list of recommendations was then revised and approved by the expert panel.

Results: The final 7-point checklist includes reporting recommendations regarding the study protocol, OCT device, acquisition settings and modifications, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection and image data analyses, and qualitative and quantitative results. With a median agreement score of 3 or 4 out of 4, the scientific community agreed with these recommendations. After revisions, the expert panel accepted the final recommendations.

Discussion: The Advised Protocol for OCT Study Terminology and Elements for reporting OCT studies in rodents (APOSTEL-R) originates from an expert consensus. They will provide guidance throughout the experimental process and will contribute to the standardization and quality improvement of preclinical OCT studies.

APOSTEL-R推荐报告啮齿动物视网膜光学相干断层扫描研究。
背景和目的:在啮齿动物模型中使用视网膜光学相干断层扫描(OCT)来纵向成像视网膜变化,为更昂贵或耗时的实验确定终点,并更好地了解人类疾病中OCT发现的病理生理学基础。目前尚无啮齿类动物OCT报告的标准化。在这里,我们的目标是建立一致的建议报告视网膜OCT研究结果在啮齿动物。方法:核心团队根据APOSTEL标准制定了人类OCT定量报告的初步建议。使用改进的德尔菲过程,一个由啮齿动物OCT研究人员组成的专家小组(N = 31)和更广泛的科学界对这些初步建议进行了讨论、完善和投票。建议清单随后经专家小组修订和批准。结果:最终的7点清单包括关于研究方案、OCT设备、采集设置和修改、扫描方案、眼底成像、采集后数据选择和图像数据分析以及定性和定量结果的报告建议。科学界同意这些建议的中位数为3或4分(满分4分)。经过修订,专家小组接受了最终建议。讨论:报告啮齿类动物OCT研究的OCT研究术语和要素的建议方案(APOSTEL-R)源自专家共识。他们将在整个实验过程中提供指导,并将有助于临床前OCT研究的标准化和质量提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信