Further delineation of the etiology of liver abscesses in cattle and indication of hindgut as a potential source of pathogens.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Harith M Salih, Alyssa Deters, Raghavendra G Amachawadi, Haiyan Wang, Taghreed Mahmood, Xiaorong Shi, Mina Abbasi, Leigh Ann George, Ty E Lawrence, T G Nagaraja
{"title":"Further delineation of the etiology of liver abscesses in cattle and indication of hindgut as a potential source of pathogens.","authors":"Harith M Salih, Alyssa Deters, Raghavendra G Amachawadi, Haiyan Wang, Taghreed Mahmood, Xiaorong Shi, Mina Abbasi, Leigh Ann George, Ty E Lawrence, T G Nagaraja","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02539-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver abscesses (LA) in feedlot cattle are polymicrobial infections, initiated primarily by the translocations of the two subspecies of <i>Fusobacterium necrophorum, necrophorum</i> and <i>funduliforme,</i> and secondarily by <i>Trueperella pyogenes</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica</i> from the rumen into the liver via portal blood. The hindgut has not been investigated as a potential source of LA pathogens. Our objectives were to analyze LA and matched ruminal and colonic epithelial tissues (<i>n</i> = 96), collected at a commercial beef processor immediately after evisceration, to determine culture-based prevalence of pathogens, specifically, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, and <i>Bacteroides fragilis,</i> which have not been targeted before, in addition to <i>F. necrophorum, T. pyogenes,</i> and <i>S. enterica,</i> and quantitative PCR-based prevalence and concentrations of the <i>F. necrophorum</i> subspecies. The subsp. <i>necrophorum</i> was the most dominant species in LA detected by both methods, and concentrations were in the range of 7.0 log<sub>10</sub> colony forming units (CFU). Fusobacterial concentrations were higher in ruminal epithelial than in colonic epithelial tissues, but colonic epithelial tissues yielded more subsp. <i>necrophorum</i> isolates than ruminal epithelial tissues. Of the targeted bacterial species, <i>E. coli</i> was the most dominant, and none of the tissues was positive for <i>B. fragilis</i>. A majority of the isolations of <i>E. coli</i> were after enrichment, suggesting the concentrations were too low to contribute to the abscess development. The data reaffirm that LA are polymicrobial infections, <i>F. necrophorum,</i> specifically <i>necrophorum,</i> is the most dominant species prevalent, and the hindgut is likely to be a source, in addition to the rumen, of pathogens that cause LA.IMPORTANCELiver abscesses (LA) in beef cattle are initiated by entry of bacterial pathogens from the rumen via portal blood. The two most frequently isolated pathogens are the two subspecies of <i>Fusobacterium necrophorum,</i> followed by <i>Trueperella pyogenes</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica</i>. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of pathogens that have been reported sporadically and have not been targeted before. Liver abscesses and matched ruminal epithelium and colonic epithelial tissues, collected from feedlot cattle at slaughter, were analyzed by culture and PCR methods. The subsp. <i>necrophorum</i> was the most dominant bacterium in liver abscesses. Colonic epithelial tissues yielded more subsp. <i>necrophorum</i> than ruminal epithelial tissues. Although <i>Escherichia coli</i> was the second most prevalent species, a majority of the isolates were obtained after enrichment, indicating low concentrations. Our data reaffirm that <i>F. necrophorum</i> is the dominant species prevalent in LA, and the hindgut is likely to be another source of pathogens that cause LA.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0253925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02539-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver abscesses (LA) in feedlot cattle are polymicrobial infections, initiated primarily by the translocations of the two subspecies of Fusobacterium necrophorum, necrophorum and funduliforme, and secondarily by Trueperella pyogenes and Salmonella enterica from the rumen into the liver via portal blood. The hindgut has not been investigated as a potential source of LA pathogens. Our objectives were to analyze LA and matched ruminal and colonic epithelial tissues (n = 96), collected at a commercial beef processor immediately after evisceration, to determine culture-based prevalence of pathogens, specifically, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis, which have not been targeted before, in addition to F. necrophorum, T. pyogenes, and S. enterica, and quantitative PCR-based prevalence and concentrations of the F. necrophorum subspecies. The subsp. necrophorum was the most dominant species in LA detected by both methods, and concentrations were in the range of 7.0 log10 colony forming units (CFU). Fusobacterial concentrations were higher in ruminal epithelial than in colonic epithelial tissues, but colonic epithelial tissues yielded more subsp. necrophorum isolates than ruminal epithelial tissues. Of the targeted bacterial species, E. coli was the most dominant, and none of the tissues was positive for B. fragilis. A majority of the isolations of E. coli were after enrichment, suggesting the concentrations were too low to contribute to the abscess development. The data reaffirm that LA are polymicrobial infections, F. necrophorum, specifically necrophorum, is the most dominant species prevalent, and the hindgut is likely to be a source, in addition to the rumen, of pathogens that cause LA.IMPORTANCELiver abscesses (LA) in beef cattle are initiated by entry of bacterial pathogens from the rumen via portal blood. The two most frequently isolated pathogens are the two subspecies of Fusobacterium necrophorum, followed by Trueperella pyogenes and Salmonella enterica. Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of pathogens that have been reported sporadically and have not been targeted before. Liver abscesses and matched ruminal epithelium and colonic epithelial tissues, collected from feedlot cattle at slaughter, were analyzed by culture and PCR methods. The subsp. necrophorum was the most dominant bacterium in liver abscesses. Colonic epithelial tissues yielded more subsp. necrophorum than ruminal epithelial tissues. Although Escherichia coli was the second most prevalent species, a majority of the isolates were obtained after enrichment, indicating low concentrations. Our data reaffirm that F. necrophorum is the dominant species prevalent in LA, and the hindgut is likely to be another source of pathogens that cause LA.

进一步描述了牛肝脓肿的病因,并指出后肠是潜在的病原体来源。
饲养场牛的肝脓肿(LA)是一种多微生物感染,主要由坏死性梭菌、坏死性梭菌和底状梭菌两种亚种易位引起,其次由化脓性真杆菌和肠沙门氏菌从瘤胃经门静脉血液进入肝脏引起。后肠尚未被调查作为LA病原体的潜在来源。我们的目标是分析LA和匹配的瘤胃和结肠上皮组织(n = 96),这些组织采集于一家商业牛肉加工机,在内脏取出后立即收集,以确定基于培养的病原体的流行情况,特别是大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和脆弱拟杆菌,除了necrophorum、化脓性T.和肠链球菌之外,这些病原体之前没有被针对过。以定量pcr为基础的坏死棘球蚴亚种的流行率和浓度。无性系种群。两种方法检测到的LA中最优势种为necrophorum,菌落形成单位(colony forming units, CFU)均在7.0 log10范围内。瘤胃上皮组织中梭杆菌浓度高于结肠上皮组织,但结肠上皮组织中梭杆菌含量较高。瘤胃上皮组织中分离出坏死性瘤胃。在目标细菌种类中,大肠杆菌是最占优势的,没有组织呈脆弱杆菌阳性。大多数大肠杆菌是在富集后分离出来的,表明浓度太低,无法促进脓肿的发展。这些数据再次证实LA是多微生物感染,坏死乳杆菌,特别是坏死乳杆菌,是最主要的流行种,并且除了瘤胃外,后肠可能是引起LA的病原体的来源。肉牛肝脏脓肿(LA)是由细菌病原体通过门静脉血液从瘤胃进入引起的。最常分离的两种病原体是坏死梭杆菌的两个亚种,其次是化脓性真杆菌和肠沙门氏菌。我们的目标是确定病原体的流行情况,这些病原体是零星报道的,以前没有针对过。采用培养和聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法对屠宰时饲养牛的肝脓肿及匹配的瘤胃上皮和结肠上皮组织进行分析。无性系种群。肝脓肿中以坏死菌为主。结肠上皮组织产生更多亚芽孢杆菌。坏死瘤多于瘤胃上皮组织。虽然大肠杆菌是第二常见的菌种,但大多数分离物是在富集后获得的,表明浓度较低。我们的数据再次证实,坏死梭菌是LA流行的优势种,后肠可能是导致LA的另一个病原体来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信