Comparative Impact of Early Graft Function on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes According to Donor Types.

IF 3 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-10-08 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000933
Jeongin Song, Eunjeong Kang, Sehyun Jeong, Hyung Eun Son, Ahram Han, Sangil Min, Jongwon Ha, Jung Pyo Lee, Jong Cheol Jeong, Sehoon Park, Yong Chul Kim, Dong Ki Kim, Yon Su Kim, Hajeong Lee
{"title":"Comparative Impact of Early Graft Function on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes According to Donor Types.","authors":"Jeongin Song, Eunjeong Kang, Sehyun Jeong, Hyung Eun Son, Ahram Han, Sangil Min, Jongwon Ha, Jung Pyo Lee, Jong Cheol Jeong, Sehoon Park, Yong Chul Kim, Dong Ki Kim, Yon Su Kim, Hajeong Lee","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rise of high-risk living donor kidney transplantation, the impact of early graft function (EGF) on transplant outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, we classified kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs) based on EGF and donor type. EGF within the first post-transplant week was classified as immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), or delayed graft function (DGF), with impaired EGF defined as SGF or DGF. The primary outcomes included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) within one year, death-censored graft failure (DCGF), and overall mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,261 KTRs, 365 (11.2%) experienced impaired EGF, including 190 (5.8%) with SGF and 175 (5.4%) with DGF. In living donor KTRs, impaired EGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of one-year BPAR (aHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.39) and DCGF (aHR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.29-4.82) but not mortality. Both SGF and DGF increased the risk of BPAR, while only DGF significantly elevated the risk of DCGF. In deceased donor KTRs, impaired EGF was associated with a higher risk of both DCGF (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.43-3.31) and mortality (aHR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.52-3.49) with SGF and DGF demonstrating similar patterns. Notably, prolonged DGF (≥7 days) was linked to progressively worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of impaired EGF varies by donor type. In living donor KTRs, impaired EGF increased the risks of BPAR and DCGF, particularly in cases of DGF. In deceased donor KTRs, impaired EGF elevated the risks of DCGF and mortality but not BPAR, highlighting the need for tailored strategies to optimize EGF.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the rise of high-risk living donor kidney transplantation, the impact of early graft function (EGF) on transplant outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, we classified kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs) based on EGF and donor type. EGF within the first post-transplant week was classified as immediate graft function (IGF), slow graft function (SGF), or delayed graft function (DGF), with impaired EGF defined as SGF or DGF. The primary outcomes included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) within one year, death-censored graft failure (DCGF), and overall mortality.

Results: Among 3,261 KTRs, 365 (11.2%) experienced impaired EGF, including 190 (5.8%) with SGF and 175 (5.4%) with DGF. In living donor KTRs, impaired EGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of one-year BPAR (aHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.39) and DCGF (aHR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.29-4.82) but not mortality. Both SGF and DGF increased the risk of BPAR, while only DGF significantly elevated the risk of DCGF. In deceased donor KTRs, impaired EGF was associated with a higher risk of both DCGF (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.43-3.31) and mortality (aHR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.52-3.49) with SGF and DGF demonstrating similar patterns. Notably, prolonged DGF (≥7 days) was linked to progressively worse outcomes.

Conclusions: The impact of impaired EGF varies by donor type. In living donor KTRs, impaired EGF increased the risks of BPAR and DCGF, particularly in cases of DGF. In deceased donor KTRs, impaired EGF elevated the risks of DCGF and mortality but not BPAR, highlighting the need for tailored strategies to optimize EGF.

不同供体类型早期移植功能对肾移植结果的影响比较。
背景:随着高风险活体肾移植的增加,早期移植功能(EGF)对移植结果的影响尚不清楚。方法:在这项回顾性多中心研究中,我们根据EGF和供体类型对肾移植受者(KTRs)进行分类。移植后第一周内的EGF分为立即移植物功能(IGF)、缓慢移植物功能(SGF)或延迟移植物功能(DGF),受损的EGF分为SGF或DGF。主要结局包括一年内活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR)、死亡审查的移植物衰竭(DCGF)和总死亡率。结果:在3261例ktr中,365例(11.2%)出现EGF受损,其中190例(5.8%)为SGF, 175例(5.4%)为DGF。在活体供体ktr中,EGF受损与一年BPAR (aHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.39)和DCGF (aHR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.29-4.82)风险增加显著相关,但与死亡率无关。SGF和DGF均增加BPAR的风险,而只有DGF显著提高DCGF的风险。在死亡供体ktr中,EGF受损与DCGF (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.43-3.31)和死亡率(aHR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.52-3.49)的高风险相关,SGF和DGF表现出相似的模式。值得注意的是,延长DGF(≥7天)与逐渐恶化的结果相关。结论:EGF受损的影响因供体类型而异。在活体供体ktr中,EGF受损增加了BPAR和DCGF的风险,特别是在DGF的情况下。在死亡供体ktr中,受损的EGF会增加DCGF和死亡率的风险,但不会增加BPAR的风险,这突出了优化EGF的定制策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信