Ultrasound assessment of the effects of three different fasting regimens of clear fluids on gastric fluid volume in children.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiaofang Liu, Xianjun Li, Junxia Wang, Liang Zhao, Chunhong Duan, Dongmei Li, Bin Zhang
{"title":"Ultrasound assessment of the effects of three different fasting regimens of clear fluids on gastric fluid volume in children.","authors":"Xiaofang Liu, Xianjun Li, Junxia Wang, Liang Zhao, Chunhong Duan, Dongmei Li, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-hour minimum fasting policy for clear fluids before surgery may prolong fasting and cause negative experiences for children. One-hour minimum and/or liberal fasting policies for clear fluids can significantly shorten the fasting time. However, their effectiveness and safety remain inadequately validated. This study investigated the effects of the above three regimens on the gastric fluid volume (GFV) before anesthesia induction in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial involved 147 children (1-13 years old, ASA I or II) undergoing elective tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and were randomly allocated to three groups: Group 2: fasting clear fluids for a minimum of 2 h, Group 1: fasting clear fluids for a minimum of 1 h, and Group 0: liberal fluid fasting. Water intake was measured within 6 h before surgery. The primary outcome was GFV before anesthesia induction. Secondary outcomes included water intake behavior and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three groups, there was no evidence for differences in GFVs. The total water intake volume within 6 h before surgery was 80.0 (IQR: 40.0-160.0) mL for Group 2, 150.0 (IQR: 72.5-300.0) mL for Group 1, and 85.0 (IQR: 40.0-180.0) mL for Group 0. The total number of water intake episodes was 1.0 (1.0-2.5), 2.5 (1.0-4.0), and 2.0 (1.0-3.0) for Group 2/1/0, respectively. The last water intake volume before surgery in Group 2/1/0 was 60 (IQR: 30-100) mL, 60 (IQR: 30-100) mL, and 40 (IQR: 20-60) mL, respectively. There were no increases in adverse events among groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to fasting with clear fluids for 2 h, the 1-h and liberal fluid fasting regimens do not increase GFV in children before induction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration (No. ChiCTR2300078309; Date: December 5, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"107 ","pages":"112025"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two-hour minimum fasting policy for clear fluids before surgery may prolong fasting and cause negative experiences for children. One-hour minimum and/or liberal fasting policies for clear fluids can significantly shorten the fasting time. However, their effectiveness and safety remain inadequately validated. This study investigated the effects of the above three regimens on the gastric fluid volume (GFV) before anesthesia induction in children.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial involved 147 children (1-13 years old, ASA I or II) undergoing elective tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and were randomly allocated to three groups: Group 2: fasting clear fluids for a minimum of 2 h, Group 1: fasting clear fluids for a minimum of 1 h, and Group 0: liberal fluid fasting. Water intake was measured within 6 h before surgery. The primary outcome was GFV before anesthesia induction. Secondary outcomes included water intake behavior and adverse events.

Results: Among the three groups, there was no evidence for differences in GFVs. The total water intake volume within 6 h before surgery was 80.0 (IQR: 40.0-160.0) mL for Group 2, 150.0 (IQR: 72.5-300.0) mL for Group 1, and 85.0 (IQR: 40.0-180.0) mL for Group 0. The total number of water intake episodes was 1.0 (1.0-2.5), 2.5 (1.0-4.0), and 2.0 (1.0-3.0) for Group 2/1/0, respectively. The last water intake volume before surgery in Group 2/1/0 was 60 (IQR: 30-100) mL, 60 (IQR: 30-100) mL, and 40 (IQR: 20-60) mL, respectively. There were no increases in adverse events among groups.

Conclusion: Compared to fasting with clear fluids for 2 h, the 1-h and liberal fluid fasting regimens do not increase GFV in children before induction.

Trial registration: This prospective randomized controlled trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration (No. ChiCTR2300078309; Date: December 5, 2023).

超声评价三种不同清液禁食方案对儿童胃液量的影响。
背景:手术前清除液体最少禁食两小时的政策可能会延长禁食时间并对儿童造成负面影响。至少禁食1小时和/或自由禁食可显著缩短禁食时间。然而,它们的有效性和安全性仍未得到充分验证。本研究探讨了上述三种方案对儿童麻醉诱导前胃液量(GFV)的影响。方法:这项前瞻性随机对照试验纳入147名接受选择性扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术的儿童(1-13岁,ASA I或II),并随机分为三组:2组:禁食至少2小时的清液,1组:禁食至少1小时的清液,0组:自由禁食液体。术前6小时内测量摄水量。主要终点是麻醉诱导前的GFV。次要结局包括饮水行为和不良事件。结果:在三组中,没有证据表明gfv有差异。术前6 h总摄水量2组为80.0 (IQR: 40.0 ~ 160.0) mL, 1组为150.0 (IQR: 72.5 ~ 3000.0) mL, 0组为85.0 (IQR: 40.0 ~ 180.0) mL。2/1/0组总取水次数分别为1.0次(1.0 ~ 2.5次)、2.5次(1.0 ~ 4.0次)和2.0次(1.0 ~ 3.0次)。2/1/0组患者术前最后摄水量分别为60 (IQR: 30-100) mL、60 (IQR: 30-100) mL、40 (IQR: 20-60) mL。各组之间的不良事件没有增加。结论:与清水禁食2小时相比,1小时和自由液体禁食方案不会增加诱导前儿童的GFV。试验注册:本前瞻性随机对照试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册。ChiCTR2300078309;日期:2023年12月5日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信