Integrating surface-guided radiation therapy and continuous positive airway pressure for breast cancer: Improving reproducibility and efficacy

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jin Dong Cho, Su Chul Han, Jason Joon Bock Lee, Hyebin Lee, Heerim Nam
{"title":"Integrating surface-guided radiation therapy and continuous positive airway pressure for breast cancer: Improving reproducibility and efficacy","authors":"Jin Dong Cho,&nbsp;Su Chul Han,&nbsp;Jason Joon Bock Lee,&nbsp;Hyebin Lee,&nbsp;Heerim Nam","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The utility of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains underexplored compared to its application with deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH). This study investigates the integration of CPAP and SGRT, focusing on positional reproducibility and treatment efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the impact of patient surface displacement during breast cancer radiation therapy using optical and thermal SGRT monitoring and compared treatment time characteristics between patients undergoing SGRT, either with or without CPAP, and a cohort of patients undergoing treatment without SGRT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SGRT cohort comprised thirty patients: 15 with CPAP (CPAP + SGRT) and 15 without CPAP (SGRT-only). The surface displacement was monitored using an advanced optical and thermal SGRT system with thresholds of 3 mm for translational and 2.5° for rotational displacement. Treatment workflow metrics and positional deviations were assessed across 16 fractions. A comparative analysis included a cohort of 27 free-breathing (FB) patients who did not receive SGRT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Positional reproducibility was similar in both SGRT groups, with translation vectors of 1.46 ± 0.98 mm (CPAP + SGRT) and 1.37 ± 0.80 mm (SGRT-only) and rotation vectors of 0.57 ± 0.40° and 0.57 ± 0.39°, respectively. Despite comparable displacement control, treatment delivery time variability was highest in the CPAP + SGRT group (normalized standard deviation: 0.16), followed by the SGRT-only (0.11) and FB groups (0.03). The broader time distributions in the SGRT group were attributed to beam-hold activations exceeding the displacement thresholds, whereas total treatment time did not differ significantly between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SGRT effectively minimized displacement-related uncertainties during breast cancer radiation therapy with and without CPAP. Although CPAP provides additional internal stabilization and its integration with SGRT increased treatment delivery time variability, the total treatment time remained comparable across all groups. These findings underscore the potential of SGRT and CPAP as complementary tools to enhance precision and safety, particularly for techniques requiring high positional accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The utility of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains underexplored compared to its application with deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH). This study investigates the integration of CPAP and SGRT, focusing on positional reproducibility and treatment efficiency.

Purpose

This study evaluated the impact of patient surface displacement during breast cancer radiation therapy using optical and thermal SGRT monitoring and compared treatment time characteristics between patients undergoing SGRT, either with or without CPAP, and a cohort of patients undergoing treatment without SGRT.

Methods

The SGRT cohort comprised thirty patients: 15 with CPAP (CPAP + SGRT) and 15 without CPAP (SGRT-only). The surface displacement was monitored using an advanced optical and thermal SGRT system with thresholds of 3 mm for translational and 2.5° for rotational displacement. Treatment workflow metrics and positional deviations were assessed across 16 fractions. A comparative analysis included a cohort of 27 free-breathing (FB) patients who did not receive SGRT.

Results

Positional reproducibility was similar in both SGRT groups, with translation vectors of 1.46 ± 0.98 mm (CPAP + SGRT) and 1.37 ± 0.80 mm (SGRT-only) and rotation vectors of 0.57 ± 0.40° and 0.57 ± 0.39°, respectively. Despite comparable displacement control, treatment delivery time variability was highest in the CPAP + SGRT group (normalized standard deviation: 0.16), followed by the SGRT-only (0.11) and FB groups (0.03). The broader time distributions in the SGRT group were attributed to beam-hold activations exceeding the displacement thresholds, whereas total treatment time did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions

SGRT effectively minimized displacement-related uncertainties during breast cancer radiation therapy with and without CPAP. Although CPAP provides additional internal stabilization and its integration with SGRT increased treatment delivery time variability, the total treatment time remained comparable across all groups. These findings underscore the potential of SGRT and CPAP as complementary tools to enhance precision and safety, particularly for techniques requiring high positional accuracy.

Abstract Image

结合表面引导放射治疗和持续气道正压治疗乳腺癌:提高可重复性和疗效。
背景:与深度吸气屏气(DIBH)相比,持续气道正压(CPAP)表面引导放射治疗(SGRT)的应用仍未得到充分探索。本研究探讨了CPAP和SGRT的整合,重点关注位置重现性和治疗效率。目的:本研究通过光学和热SGRT监测来评估乳腺癌放疗期间患者体表移位的影响,并比较接受SGRT治疗的患者(有或没有CPAP)与不接受SGRT治疗的患者的治疗时间特征。方法:SGRT队列包括30例患者:15例CPAP (CPAP + SGRT)和15例未CPAP (SGRT-only)。使用先进的光学和热SGRT系统监测地表位移,平移位移阈值为3 mm,旋转位移阈值为2.5°。在16个分数中评估了治疗工作流程指标和位置偏差。一项比较分析包括一组27例未接受SGRT的自由呼吸(FB)患者。结果:两个SGRT组的位置重现性相似,平移矢量分别为1.46±0.98 mm (CPAP + SGRT)和1.37±0.80 mm (SGRT-only),旋转矢量分别为0.57±0.40°和0.57±0.39°。尽管有类似的位移控制,但CPAP + SGRT组的治疗递送时间变异性最高(标准化标准差:0.16),其次是SGRT组(0.11)和FB组(0.03)。SGRT组更广泛的时间分布归因于超过位移阈值的波束保持激活,而两组之间的总治疗时间没有显着差异。结论:SGRT有效地减少了乳腺癌放射治疗中与移位相关的不确定性,无论是否有CPAP。尽管CPAP提供了额外的内部稳定,并且与SGRT的结合增加了治疗时间的可变性,但所有组的总治疗时间仍然具有可比性。这些发现强调了SGRT和CPAP作为提高精度和安全性的补充工具的潜力,特别是对于需要高定位精度的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信