Jin Dong Cho, Su Chul Han, Jason Joon Bock Lee, Hyebin Lee, Heerim Nam
{"title":"Integrating surface-guided radiation therapy and continuous positive airway pressure for breast cancer: Improving reproducibility and efficacy","authors":"Jin Dong Cho, Su Chul Han, Jason Joon Bock Lee, Hyebin Lee, Heerim Nam","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The utility of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains underexplored compared to its application with deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH). This study investigates the integration of CPAP and SGRT, focusing on positional reproducibility and treatment efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the impact of patient surface displacement during breast cancer radiation therapy using optical and thermal SGRT monitoring and compared treatment time characteristics between patients undergoing SGRT, either with or without CPAP, and a cohort of patients undergoing treatment without SGRT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SGRT cohort comprised thirty patients: 15 with CPAP (CPAP + SGRT) and 15 without CPAP (SGRT-only). The surface displacement was monitored using an advanced optical and thermal SGRT system with thresholds of 3 mm for translational and 2.5° for rotational displacement. Treatment workflow metrics and positional deviations were assessed across 16 fractions. A comparative analysis included a cohort of 27 free-breathing (FB) patients who did not receive SGRT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Positional reproducibility was similar in both SGRT groups, with translation vectors of 1.46 ± 0.98 mm (CPAP + SGRT) and 1.37 ± 0.80 mm (SGRT-only) and rotation vectors of 0.57 ± 0.40° and 0.57 ± 0.39°, respectively. Despite comparable displacement control, treatment delivery time variability was highest in the CPAP + SGRT group (normalized standard deviation: 0.16), followed by the SGRT-only (0.11) and FB groups (0.03). The broader time distributions in the SGRT group were attributed to beam-hold activations exceeding the displacement thresholds, whereas total treatment time did not differ significantly between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SGRT effectively minimized displacement-related uncertainties during breast cancer radiation therapy with and without CPAP. Although CPAP provides additional internal stabilization and its integration with SGRT increased treatment delivery time variability, the total treatment time remained comparable across all groups. These findings underscore the potential of SGRT and CPAP as complementary tools to enhance precision and safety, particularly for techniques requiring high positional accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The utility of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains underexplored compared to its application with deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH). This study investigates the integration of CPAP and SGRT, focusing on positional reproducibility and treatment efficiency.
Purpose
This study evaluated the impact of patient surface displacement during breast cancer radiation therapy using optical and thermal SGRT monitoring and compared treatment time characteristics between patients undergoing SGRT, either with or without CPAP, and a cohort of patients undergoing treatment without SGRT.
Methods
The SGRT cohort comprised thirty patients: 15 with CPAP (CPAP + SGRT) and 15 without CPAP (SGRT-only). The surface displacement was monitored using an advanced optical and thermal SGRT system with thresholds of 3 mm for translational and 2.5° for rotational displacement. Treatment workflow metrics and positional deviations were assessed across 16 fractions. A comparative analysis included a cohort of 27 free-breathing (FB) patients who did not receive SGRT.
Results
Positional reproducibility was similar in both SGRT groups, with translation vectors of 1.46 ± 0.98 mm (CPAP + SGRT) and 1.37 ± 0.80 mm (SGRT-only) and rotation vectors of 0.57 ± 0.40° and 0.57 ± 0.39°, respectively. Despite comparable displacement control, treatment delivery time variability was highest in the CPAP + SGRT group (normalized standard deviation: 0.16), followed by the SGRT-only (0.11) and FB groups (0.03). The broader time distributions in the SGRT group were attributed to beam-hold activations exceeding the displacement thresholds, whereas total treatment time did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusions
SGRT effectively minimized displacement-related uncertainties during breast cancer radiation therapy with and without CPAP. Although CPAP provides additional internal stabilization and its integration with SGRT increased treatment delivery time variability, the total treatment time remained comparable across all groups. These findings underscore the potential of SGRT and CPAP as complementary tools to enhance precision and safety, particularly for techniques requiring high positional accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic