Investigating the use of ionization chamber and solid-state detectors to evaluate kerma-area product meter accuracy under TG-125 geometry across variable field of views
IF 2.2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Investigating the use of ionization chamber and solid-state detectors to evaluate kerma-area product meter accuracy under TG-125 geometry across variable field of views","authors":"Atsushi Fukuda, Pei-Jan Paul Lin","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A kerma-area product (KAP) meter has been installed in a fluoroscopic system, and its accuracy has been evaluated in task group (TG)-190 geometry using an external detector. However, it is unclear that external detectors could evaluate the KAP meter accuracy under the TG-125 geometry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated whether the reference air kerma rate (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\dot{K} _{a,r}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) values of the KAP meter increase with increasing field of view (FOV) and whether an external ionization chamber and solid-state detector (SSD) could be used to evaluate KAP meter accuracy in TG-125 geometry.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An ionization chamber and three different SSDs (Radcal AGMS-DM+, Raysafe X2 R/F sensor, and RTI Dose Probe) were placed at the patient entrance reference point in a C-arm fluoroscopic system, and measurements were taken at FOV settings of 18, 25, 34, and 42 cm using both the TG-190 and TG-125 geometries. The <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\dot{K} _{a,r}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, incident air kerma rate (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\dot{K} _{a,i})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, and entrance surface air kerma rate (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\dot{K} _{a,e})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values were recorded simultaneously and compared. The measurement data were used to calculate the backscatter factor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\dot{K} _{a,r}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> increased linearly with the relative X-ray output, and their slopes significantly increased with the FOV. The <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\dot{K} _{a,e}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values of the ionization chamber increased with the FOV; however, the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\dot{K} _{a,i}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values of the ionization chamber, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\dot{K} _{a,i}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$\\dot{K} _{a,e}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values of the SSDs were not dependent on the FOV and were nearly identical to each other. Although the backscatter factor for the KAP meter and ionization chamber increased with the FOV, the backscatter for the SSDs were close to unity in all FOVs and no significant difference was observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicated that the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mover>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <mo>̇</mo>\n </mover>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\dot{K} _{a,r}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> values of KAP meter were increased with the FOV. Furthermore, the SSDs could be utilized to evaluate the KAP meter accuracy in TG-125 geometry.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70281","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
A kerma-area product (KAP) meter has been installed in a fluoroscopic system, and its accuracy has been evaluated in task group (TG)-190 geometry using an external detector. However, it is unclear that external detectors could evaluate the KAP meter accuracy under the TG-125 geometry.
Purpose
This study investigated whether the reference air kerma rate () values of the KAP meter increase with increasing field of view (FOV) and whether an external ionization chamber and solid-state detector (SSD) could be used to evaluate KAP meter accuracy in TG-125 geometry.
Methods
An ionization chamber and three different SSDs (Radcal AGMS-DM+, Raysafe X2 R/F sensor, and RTI Dose Probe) were placed at the patient entrance reference point in a C-arm fluoroscopic system, and measurements were taken at FOV settings of 18, 25, 34, and 42 cm using both the TG-190 and TG-125 geometries. The , incident air kerma rate (, and entrance surface air kerma rate ( values were recorded simultaneously and compared. The measurement data were used to calculate the backscatter factor.
Results
The increased linearly with the relative X-ray output, and their slopes significantly increased with the FOV. The values of the ionization chamber increased with the FOV; however, the values of the ionization chamber, and values of the SSDs were not dependent on the FOV and were nearly identical to each other. Although the backscatter factor for the KAP meter and ionization chamber increased with the FOV, the backscatter for the SSDs were close to unity in all FOVs and no significant difference was observed.
Conclusions
The results indicated that the values of KAP meter were increased with the FOV. Furthermore, the SSDs could be utilized to evaluate the KAP meter accuracy in TG-125 geometry.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic