All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Patients With Narcolepsy.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chih-Wei Hsu, Yen-Shan Yang, Yang-Chieh Brian Chen, Liang-Jen Wang, Mu-Hong Chen, Yao-Hsu Yang, Chih-Sung Liang, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
{"title":"All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Patients With Narcolepsy.","authors":"Chih-Wei Hsu, Yen-Shan Yang, Yang-Chieh Brian Chen, Liang-Jen Wang, Mu-Hong Chen, Yao-Hsu Yang, Chih-Sung Liang, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Narcolepsy is a sleep disorder potentially affecting mortality, yet evidence on this association remains sparse.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether narcolepsy is associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2001 to 2021, with patients followed up until death or December 31, 2022. Patients were aged 6 years or older with 2 or more narcolepsy diagnoses from psychiatrists or neurologists. Controls were selected from the NHIRD as a population-based sample. Controls without narcolepsy were matched in a 1:4 ratio on sex and birth date (±6 months). Sibling controls were siblings without narcolepsy. Statistical analysis was performed from January to April 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Clinical narcolepsy diagnosis, confirmed via NHIRD records (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 347 or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code G47.4).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, measured as hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for birth year, sex, income, urbanization, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific mortality (natural, unnatural, accidents, suicides).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3187 patients with narcolepsy (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [16.1] years; 1674 male patients [52.5%]) and 12 748 controls (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [16.1] years; 6696 male patients [52.5%]), 132 patients with narcolepsy and 456 controls died. Psychiatric comorbidities, especially depression (1167 of 3187 [36.6%] vs 861 of 12 748 [6.8%]) and anxiety (1054 of 3187 [33.1%] vs 853 of 12 748 [6.7%]), were more common in the narcolepsy group than in the control group. Crude all-cause mortality rates were 44.3 per 10 000 person-years among patients with narcolepsy and 38.1 per 10 000 person-years among controls. All-cause mortality was not increased among patients with narcolepsy (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.17). There was no increase among patients with narcolepsy in cause-specific mortality for natural causes (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11), unnatural causes, (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.83-2.40), accidents (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.64-2.95), and suicides (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.62-3.22). The sibling cohort analysis similarly demonstrated no significantly increased risk among patients with narcolepsy of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.63-2.06) or cause-specific mortality from natural causes (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.28-1.56), unnatural causes (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.87-4.98), accidents (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.48-5.37), or suicides (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 0.88-13.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of Taiwanese residents, narcolepsy was not associated with excess all-cause or cause-specific mortality. These findings reduce immediate clinical concern, but the wide 95% CIs suggest that a modest increase in risk cannot be excluded; replication in other populations with longer follow-up is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2536771"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Narcolepsy is a sleep disorder potentially affecting mortality, yet evidence on this association remains sparse.

Objective: To examine whether narcolepsy is associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2001 to 2021, with patients followed up until death or December 31, 2022. Patients were aged 6 years or older with 2 or more narcolepsy diagnoses from psychiatrists or neurologists. Controls were selected from the NHIRD as a population-based sample. Controls without narcolepsy were matched in a 1:4 ratio on sex and birth date (±6 months). Sibling controls were siblings without narcolepsy. Statistical analysis was performed from January to April 2025.

Exposures: Clinical narcolepsy diagnosis, confirmed via NHIRD records (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 347 or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code G47.4).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, measured as hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusted for birth year, sex, income, urbanization, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Secondary outcomes included cause-specific mortality (natural, unnatural, accidents, suicides).

Results: Of 3187 patients with narcolepsy (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [16.1] years; 1674 male patients [52.5%]) and 12 748 controls (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [16.1] years; 6696 male patients [52.5%]), 132 patients with narcolepsy and 456 controls died. Psychiatric comorbidities, especially depression (1167 of 3187 [36.6%] vs 861 of 12 748 [6.8%]) and anxiety (1054 of 3187 [33.1%] vs 853 of 12 748 [6.7%]), were more common in the narcolepsy group than in the control group. Crude all-cause mortality rates were 44.3 per 10 000 person-years among patients with narcolepsy and 38.1 per 10 000 person-years among controls. All-cause mortality was not increased among patients with narcolepsy (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.17). There was no increase among patients with narcolepsy in cause-specific mortality for natural causes (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11), unnatural causes, (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.83-2.40), accidents (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.64-2.95), and suicides (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.62-3.22). The sibling cohort analysis similarly demonstrated no significantly increased risk among patients with narcolepsy of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.63-2.06) or cause-specific mortality from natural causes (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.28-1.56), unnatural causes (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.87-4.98), accidents (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.48-5.37), or suicides (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 0.88-13.28).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of Taiwanese residents, narcolepsy was not associated with excess all-cause or cause-specific mortality. These findings reduce immediate clinical concern, but the wide 95% CIs suggest that a modest increase in risk cannot be excluded; replication in other populations with longer follow-up is warranted.

发作性睡病患者的全因死亡率和病因特异性死亡率。
重要性:嗜睡症是一种可能影响死亡率的睡眠障碍,但这种关联的证据仍然很少。目的:探讨发作性睡病是否与全因和特异性死亡风险增加有关。​患者年龄在6岁或以上,有2次或2次以上的发作性睡病被精神科医生或神经科医生诊断。从NHIRD中选择对照作为基于人群的样本。无发作性睡病的对照组按性别和出生日期(±6个月)按1:4的比例配对。同胞对照为没有发作性睡病的同胞。统计分析时间为2025年1 - 4月。暴露:临床发作性睡病诊断,通过NHIRD记录(《国际疾病分类》第九版,临床修改代码347或《国际疾病与相关健康问题统计分类》第十版,临床修改代码G47.4)确认。主要结局和指标:主要结局是全因死亡率,采用Cox比例风险回归以风险比(hr)衡量,并根据出生年份、性别、收入、城市化和Charlson合并症指数进行调整。次要结局包括特定原因死亡率(自然、非自然、事故、自杀)。结果:3187例发作性睡病患者(平均[SD]年龄29.5[16.1]岁,男性1674例[52.5%])和12 748例对照(平均[SD]年龄29.5[16.1]岁,男性6696例[52.5%])中,发作性睡病患者132例,对照组456例死亡。精神合并症,尤其是抑郁症(3187例中有1167例[36.6%]对12例中有861例 748例[6.8%])和焦虑症(3187例中有1054例[33.1%]对12例中有853例 748例[6.7%])在发作性睡病组中比对照组更常见。发作性睡病患者的粗全因死亡率为44.3 / 10 000人-年,对照组为38.1 / 10 000人-年。发作性睡病患者的全因死亡率没有增加(HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.17)。发作性睡病患者的病因特异性死亡率在自然原因(HR, 0.90, 95% CI, 0.73-1.11)、非自然原因(HR, 1.41, 95% CI, 0.83-2.40)、事故(HR, 1.37, 95% CI, 0.64-2.95)和自杀(HR, 1.41, 95% CI, 0.62-3.22)中没有增加。兄弟姐妹队列分析同样显示,发作性睡病患者的全因死亡率(HR, 1.14, 95% CI, 0.63-2.06)或自然原因(HR, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.28-1.56)、非自然原因(HR, 2.08, 95% CI, 0.87-4.98)、事故(HR, 1.61, 95% CI, 0.48-5.37)或自杀(HR, 3.43, 95% CI, 0.88-13.28)的特定死因死亡率均无显著增加。结论与相关性:在这项台湾居民的队列研究中,发作性睡病与高的全因或病因特异性死亡率无关。这些发现减少了直接的临床关注,但95%的ci表明不能排除风险的适度增加;在其他人群中进行更长时间的随访是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信