Pregnancy Preferences and Incident Pregnancy in the US.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Brooke W Bullington, Isabel Muñoz, W John Boscardin, Corinne H Rocca
{"title":"Pregnancy Preferences and Incident Pregnancy in the US.","authors":"Brooke W Bullington, Isabel Muñoz, W John Boscardin, Corinne H Rocca","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Examining associations of pregnancy and childbearing desires with incident pregnancy is vital to understanding whether individuals attain their reproductive preferences. Much of the existing population-based research is limited by simplistic measurement of pregnancy desires and retrospective study designs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prospective association of pregnancy preferences with incident pregnancy and to investigate the degree to which people's attainment of their pregnancy preferences differs by sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used longitudinal data from the Surveys of Women, state-representative prospective studies of reproductive-aged females from 9 US states (Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina, and Wisconsin). Participants were recruited between November 2016 and July 2020 and followed up for 2 to 3 years, depending on the state. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 44 years and female. Analyses included participants who, at the start of each 1-year observation period, could experience pregnancy (ie, not pregnant, no tubal ligation, and not infertile). Data were analyzed from May 2024 to April 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>The primary exposure was preferences about a potential pregnancy within 3 months and childbearing within 1 year, measured using the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale. Scores were categorized into low, midrange, and high desire to avoid pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was self-reported incident pregnancy over the year after completing the DAP scale. Differences in incident pregnancy were examined within DAP score grouping by sociodemographic characteristics using model-estimated probabilities of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 9565 unique participants (3256 participants [weighted percentage, 48%] aged <30 years) who contributed 18 603 annual longitudinal observations. A majority of participants were nulliparous (4066 participants [weighted percentage, 51%]) or lived with a romantic partner (5952 participants [weighted percentage, 59%]). An estimated 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) of participants with high DAP scores reported pregnancy over a year, compared with 8% (95% CI, 7%-9%) of those with midrange DAP scores and 25% (95% CI, 23%-27%) of those with low DAP scores. The association of DAP score with pregnancy differed by age, parity, prior-year birth, cohabitation with partner, education level, employment, and racial and ethnic identity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this population-based cohort study of reproductive-aged females, realization of pregnancy preferences varied by sociodemographic characteristics, highlighting reproductive inequities. These results may be used to inform public health efforts to provide contraception, abortion, preconception, and fertility care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2536697"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36697","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Examining associations of pregnancy and childbearing desires with incident pregnancy is vital to understanding whether individuals attain their reproductive preferences. Much of the existing population-based research is limited by simplistic measurement of pregnancy desires and retrospective study designs.

Objective: To assess the prospective association of pregnancy preferences with incident pregnancy and to investigate the degree to which people's attainment of their pregnancy preferences differs by sociodemographic characteristics.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used longitudinal data from the Surveys of Women, state-representative prospective studies of reproductive-aged females from 9 US states (Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina, and Wisconsin). Participants were recruited between November 2016 and July 2020 and followed up for 2 to 3 years, depending on the state. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 44 years and female. Analyses included participants who, at the start of each 1-year observation period, could experience pregnancy (ie, not pregnant, no tubal ligation, and not infertile). Data were analyzed from May 2024 to April 2025.

Exposures: The primary exposure was preferences about a potential pregnancy within 3 months and childbearing within 1 year, measured using the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale. Scores were categorized into low, midrange, and high desire to avoid pregnancy.

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was self-reported incident pregnancy over the year after completing the DAP scale. Differences in incident pregnancy were examined within DAP score grouping by sociodemographic characteristics using model-estimated probabilities of pregnancy.

Results: The sample included 9565 unique participants (3256 participants [weighted percentage, 48%] aged <30 years) who contributed 18 603 annual longitudinal observations. A majority of participants were nulliparous (4066 participants [weighted percentage, 51%]) or lived with a romantic partner (5952 participants [weighted percentage, 59%]). An estimated 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) of participants with high DAP scores reported pregnancy over a year, compared with 8% (95% CI, 7%-9%) of those with midrange DAP scores and 25% (95% CI, 23%-27%) of those with low DAP scores. The association of DAP score with pregnancy differed by age, parity, prior-year birth, cohabitation with partner, education level, employment, and racial and ethnic identity.

Conclusions and relevance: In this population-based cohort study of reproductive-aged females, realization of pregnancy preferences varied by sociodemographic characteristics, highlighting reproductive inequities. These results may be used to inform public health efforts to provide contraception, abortion, preconception, and fertility care.

美国的妊娠偏好和意外妊娠。
重要性:研究怀孕和生育欲望与意外怀孕的关系对于了解个体是否实现其生殖偏好至关重要。许多现有的以人群为基础的研究受限于对怀孕愿望的简单测量和回顾性研究设计。目的:评估妊娠偏好与意外妊娠的前瞻性关联,并调查人们实现其妊娠偏好的程度因社会人口统计学特征而异。设计、环境和参与者:本队列研究使用了来自妇女调查的纵向数据,这是来自美国9个州(阿拉巴马州、亚利桑那州、特拉华州、爱荷华州、马里兰州、新泽西州、俄亥俄州、南卡罗来纳州和威斯康星州)的育龄妇女的前瞻性研究。参与者在2016年11月至2020年7月期间被招募,并根据各州的情况进行了2至3年的随访。符合条件的参与者年龄在18至44岁之间,为女性。分析包括在每1年观察期开始时可能怀孕(即未怀孕,未结扎输卵管,未不孕)的参与者。数据分析时间为2024年5月至2025年4月。暴露:主要暴露是对3个月内怀孕和1年内生育的偏好,使用避免怀孕的愿望(DAP)量表进行测量。得分分为低、中、高三个等级。主要结局和测量方法:主要结局为完成DAP量表后一年内自我报告的意外怀孕。使用模型估计的怀孕概率,通过社会人口学特征来检查DAP评分分组中意外怀孕的差异。结果:样本包括9565名独特参与者(3256名参与者[加权百分比,48%])。结论和相关性:在这项以人口为基础的育龄女性队列研究中,对怀孕偏好的实现因社会人口统计学特征而异,突出了生殖不平等。这些结果可用于告知公共卫生工作,以提供避孕、堕胎、孕前和生育保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信