Clinical Significance of a Multicancer Screening Trial With Stage-Based End Points.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kemal Caglar Gogebakan, Jane Lange, Lukas Owens, Amalie Pinderup, Roman Gulati, Larry G Kessler, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Ruth Etzioni
{"title":"Clinical Significance of a Multicancer Screening Trial With Stage-Based End Points.","authors":"Kemal Caglar Gogebakan, Jane Lange, Lukas Owens, Amalie Pinderup, Roman Gulati, Larry G Kessler, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Ruth Etzioni","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The first randomized screening trial of a multicancer early detection test is ongoing, with the primary end point being the incidence of late-stage cancer. The unprecedented use of a stage-based end point and short 3-year follow-up raise questions about how results should be interpreted and used in developing multicancer screening policy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate outcomes of the trial and to identify information from the estimates that may aid in interpreting results of short-term trials evaluating multicancer screening tests.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicancer decision-analytic model estimated outcomes from registry data from the England National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service for cases diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2018. This model simulated a population-based multicancer screening trial of average-risk participants without a prior cancer diagnosis. The analysis was performed between April 2024 and April 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three annual multicancer screenings at months 0, 12, and 24. Cancers were assumed detectable 1 or 2 years before clinical diagnosis based on a published analysis, and cancer-specific early-stage sensitivities were set to either 100% or 50% of published sensitivities among clinically diagnosed cases.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Reductions in late-stage (stage III-IV) cancer incidence over 3 years, cancer mortality over 5 years, and contributions of each cancer type to reductions in late-stage incidence and cancer mortality across the range of detectable intervals and early-stage sensitivities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model simulated 70 000 participants per arm (screening and control; median age, 66 years), and estimated that the overall late-stage incidence reductions at 3 years ranged from 6% to 23%, with corresponding reductions in 5-year cancer mortality from 6% to 9%. Colorectal cancer contributed the most to the reduction in late-stage incidence (28% to 39%), while lung cancer contributed the most to mortality reduction (40% to 42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This independent decision-analytic model study found that the trial could achieve nontrivial cancer downstaging over 3 years, but modest mortality reduction over 5 years. These results were due to a limited number of target cancer types, underscoring the importance of transparent reporting of outcomes by cancer type, consideration of mortality implications, and careful preplanning for subsequent evaluation steps by the cancer research community.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2536247"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.36247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The first randomized screening trial of a multicancer early detection test is ongoing, with the primary end point being the incidence of late-stage cancer. The unprecedented use of a stage-based end point and short 3-year follow-up raise questions about how results should be interpreted and used in developing multicancer screening policy.

Objective: To estimate outcomes of the trial and to identify information from the estimates that may aid in interpreting results of short-term trials evaluating multicancer screening tests.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicancer decision-analytic model estimated outcomes from registry data from the England National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service for cases diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2018. This model simulated a population-based multicancer screening trial of average-risk participants without a prior cancer diagnosis. The analysis was performed between April 2024 and April 2025.

Interventions: Three annual multicancer screenings at months 0, 12, and 24. Cancers were assumed detectable 1 or 2 years before clinical diagnosis based on a published analysis, and cancer-specific early-stage sensitivities were set to either 100% or 50% of published sensitivities among clinically diagnosed cases.

Main outcomes and measures: Reductions in late-stage (stage III-IV) cancer incidence over 3 years, cancer mortality over 5 years, and contributions of each cancer type to reductions in late-stage incidence and cancer mortality across the range of detectable intervals and early-stage sensitivities.

Results: The model simulated 70 000 participants per arm (screening and control; median age, 66 years), and estimated that the overall late-stage incidence reductions at 3 years ranged from 6% to 23%, with corresponding reductions in 5-year cancer mortality from 6% to 9%. Colorectal cancer contributed the most to the reduction in late-stage incidence (28% to 39%), while lung cancer contributed the most to mortality reduction (40% to 42%).

Conclusions and relevance: This independent decision-analytic model study found that the trial could achieve nontrivial cancer downstaging over 3 years, but modest mortality reduction over 5 years. These results were due to a limited number of target cancer types, underscoring the importance of transparent reporting of outcomes by cancer type, consideration of mortality implications, and careful preplanning for subsequent evaluation steps by the cancer research community.

以分期为终点的多癌筛查试验的临床意义
重要性:第一项多癌早期检测试验的随机筛选试验正在进行中,主要终点是晚期癌症的发病率。前所未有地使用基于阶段的终点和短暂的3年随访提出了关于结果应如何解释和用于制定多癌筛查政策的问题。目的:估计试验的结果,并从估计中确定可能有助于解释评估多癌筛查试验的短期试验结果的信息。设计、环境和参与者:该多癌症决策分析模型估计了2013年1月至2018年12月期间英国国家癌症登记和分析服务中心诊断病例的登记数据的结果。该模型模拟了一项基于人群的多癌症筛查试验,参与者均为无癌症诊断的平均风险参与者。该分析在2024年4月至2025年4月期间进行。干预措施:每年在第0、12和24个月进行三次多癌筛查。根据已发表的分析,假设癌症在临床诊断前1或2年可检测到,并且在临床诊断病例中,癌症特异性早期敏感性设置为已发表敏感性的100%或50%。主要结果和措施:3年内晚期(III-IV期)癌症发病率的降低,5年内癌症死亡率的降低,以及在可检测间隔和早期敏感性范围内,每种癌症类型对晚期发病率和癌症死亡率降低的贡献。结果:该模型模拟了每组70 000名参与者(筛查和对照,中位年龄66岁),并估计3年后晚期发病率总体下降幅度为6%至23%,相应的5年癌症死亡率下降幅度为6%至9%。结直肠癌对降低晚期发病率的贡献最大(28%至39%),而肺癌对降低死亡率的贡献最大(40%至42%)。结论和相关性:这项独立的决策分析模型研究发现,该试验可以在3年内实现显著的癌症分期降低,但在5年内实现适度的死亡率降低。这些结果是由于目标癌症类型的数量有限,强调了按癌症类型透明报告结果、考虑死亡率影响以及癌症研究界对后续评估步骤进行仔细预先规划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信