An empirical ranking of the importance of the sources of self-efficacy for physical activity.

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21642850.2025.2567322
Viktoria S Egele, Eric Klopp, Robin Stark
{"title":"An empirical ranking of the importance of the sources of self-efficacy for physical activity.","authors":"Viktoria S Egele, Eric Klopp, Robin Stark","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2025.2567322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While considerable research has centered on the concept of self-efficacy and its impact on behavior, relatively few studies have delved into the sources of self-efficacy beliefs. Bandura posited that the genesis of self-efficacy beliefs is based on the following four aspects: <i>personal experience, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion,</i> and <i>emotional state</i>. The objective of this research paper is to ascertain the relative importance of each source concerning self-efficacy for physical activity to determine whether some sources should be accorded with greater emphasis than others in future studies aiming to foster self-efficacy beliefs for physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online study with 335 healthy German adults (162 men, 173 women) aged 18-68 was conducted. The sources of self-efficacy were compared by employing dominance analysis. This approach allows for the ordering of predictors according to their contribution to the explained variance, thereby providing more substantial insights and allowing for more concrete conclusions in comparison to the conventional multiple regression approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, <i>mastery experience</i> was shown to be the most important source of self-efficacy for physical activity, interestingly followed by <i>verbal self-persuasion</i> and <i>positive affective state</i>. Together, the sources of self-efficacy accounted for about 60% of the variance in self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, understanding the etiology of self-efficacy is essential for developing effective and sustainable interventions to promote healthy behaviors. By focusing on the specific sources of self-efficacy that are most pertinent, interventions can be designed to be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"2567322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2025.2567322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While considerable research has centered on the concept of self-efficacy and its impact on behavior, relatively few studies have delved into the sources of self-efficacy beliefs. Bandura posited that the genesis of self-efficacy beliefs is based on the following four aspects: personal experience, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and emotional state. The objective of this research paper is to ascertain the relative importance of each source concerning self-efficacy for physical activity to determine whether some sources should be accorded with greater emphasis than others in future studies aiming to foster self-efficacy beliefs for physical activity.

Methods: An online study with 335 healthy German adults (162 men, 173 women) aged 18-68 was conducted. The sources of self-efficacy were compared by employing dominance analysis. This approach allows for the ordering of predictors according to their contribution to the explained variance, thereby providing more substantial insights and allowing for more concrete conclusions in comparison to the conventional multiple regression approach.

Results: As expected, mastery experience was shown to be the most important source of self-efficacy for physical activity, interestingly followed by verbal self-persuasion and positive affective state. Together, the sources of self-efficacy accounted for about 60% of the variance in self-efficacy.

Conclusions: Overall, understanding the etiology of self-efficacy is essential for developing effective and sustainable interventions to promote healthy behaviors. By focusing on the specific sources of self-efficacy that are most pertinent, interventions can be designed to be more effective.

对身体活动中自我效能感来源的重要性进行经验排序。
背景:虽然有相当多的研究集中在自我效能感的概念及其对行为的影响上,但相对较少的研究深入到自我效能感信念的来源。Bandura认为自我效能感信念的产生基于以下四个方面:个人经历、替代经历、言语说服和情绪状态。本研究论文的目的是确定关于身体活动自我效能感的每个来源的相对重要性,以确定在未来旨在培养身体活动自我效能感信念的研究中,是否应该更加强调某些来源。方法:对335名18-68岁的健康德国成年人(162名男性,173名女性)进行在线研究。采用优势度分析比较自我效能感的来源。这种方法允许根据预测因子对被解释方差的贡献来排序,因此与传统的多元回归方法相比,提供了更实质性的见解,并允许更具体的结论。结果:正如预期的那样,掌握体验是体育活动自我效能感的最重要来源,其次是语言自我说服和积极情感状态。总的来说,自我效能感的来源约占自我效能感差异的60%。结论:总体而言,了解自我效能感的病因对于制定有效和可持续的干预措施以促进健康行为至关重要。通过关注最相关的自我效能感的具体来源,可以设计出更有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信