{"title":"ACEM Research Requirement—Is It Worth the Effort or the Money?","authors":"Eva Andreotti","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To sit for the Fellowship Clinical Examination, ACEM trainees must complete a research requirement (RR). The RR can be met through coursework modules, original research, or a thesis, though in practice, the coursework pathway dominates. Intended to embed habits of inquiry and critical appraisal, the RR is often experienced as a bureaucratic task, with limited evidence that current approaches translate into lasting changes in clinical behaviour. Structural barriers make original research largely inaccessible, while coursework offers modest impact at significant cost. With AI reshaping both research processes and learning, the College faces important choices: refine or relax authorship rules, develop optional critical appraisal modules, or embed evidence-based medicine skills more directly into workplace practice. Ultimately, the RR must evolve to ensure that trainees not only meet curriculum requirements but also develop the curiosity and capability to apply evidence meaningfully in clinical care.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To sit for the Fellowship Clinical Examination, ACEM trainees must complete a research requirement (RR). The RR can be met through coursework modules, original research, or a thesis, though in practice, the coursework pathway dominates. Intended to embed habits of inquiry and critical appraisal, the RR is often experienced as a bureaucratic task, with limited evidence that current approaches translate into lasting changes in clinical behaviour. Structural barriers make original research largely inaccessible, while coursework offers modest impact at significant cost. With AI reshaping both research processes and learning, the College faces important choices: refine or relax authorship rules, develop optional critical appraisal modules, or embed evidence-based medicine skills more directly into workplace practice. Ultimately, the RR must evolve to ensure that trainees not only meet curriculum requirements but also develop the curiosity and capability to apply evidence meaningfully in clinical care.
期刊介绍:
Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine.
Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.