Validation of an Optimized DuraClone Phenotyping Kit Workflow for TBNK Subset Quantification.

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Imilla Casado Hernandez, Yaima Zuñiga Rosales, Fatma Abdou, Shadi Sharif Shamat, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate
{"title":"Validation of an Optimized DuraClone Phenotyping Kit Workflow for TBNK Subset Quantification.","authors":"Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Imilla Casado Hernandez, Yaima Zuñiga Rosales, Fatma Abdou, Shadi Sharif Shamat, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantification of T-cells, B-cells, and NK-cells assay is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring immune diseases and evaluating lymphodepleting therapies. To standardize and validate an optimized workflow of the Beckman Coulter DuraClone IM Phenotyping Basic Kit for quantification of TBNK subsets in peripheral blood. Procedural changes included the use of an alternative lysis buffer, the addition of counting beads, the elimination of centrifugation steps, and an increase in acquisition volume. Validation followed CLSI H42-A2 and H62 guidelines, assessing accuracy, precision, linearity, and limit of quantification (LLOQ). Accuracy was evaluated by comparison with Immuno-Trol controls and by Bland-Altman analysis against standard immunophenotyping methods. External proficiency was assessed through participation in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) TBNK program in 2024. Procedural steps were reduced by 50%, and processing time by 38.6%. The modified method demonstrated high accuracy (-3 < bias < 35; cells/μL), a low bias based on Immuno-Trol targets, and strong agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The method successfully passed three CAP external proficiency tests in 2024, confirming interlaboratory reliability. Coefficients of variation for precision were below 10% for all subsets. Linearity exceeded R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99 across clinically relevant ranges. Most subsets demonstrated an LLOQ below 10-50 cells/μL, which is suitable for clinical applications. The proposed modifications to the DuraClone IM kit protocol improved workflow efficiency and analytical performance without compromising accuracy or reproducibility. The validated method provides a standardized, reliable, and time-efficient alternative for lymphocyte subset quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantification of T-cells, B-cells, and NK-cells assay is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring immune diseases and evaluating lymphodepleting therapies. To standardize and validate an optimized workflow of the Beckman Coulter DuraClone IM Phenotyping Basic Kit for quantification of TBNK subsets in peripheral blood. Procedural changes included the use of an alternative lysis buffer, the addition of counting beads, the elimination of centrifugation steps, and an increase in acquisition volume. Validation followed CLSI H42-A2 and H62 guidelines, assessing accuracy, precision, linearity, and limit of quantification (LLOQ). Accuracy was evaluated by comparison with Immuno-Trol controls and by Bland-Altman analysis against standard immunophenotyping methods. External proficiency was assessed through participation in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) TBNK program in 2024. Procedural steps were reduced by 50%, and processing time by 38.6%. The modified method demonstrated high accuracy (-3 < bias < 35; cells/μL), a low bias based on Immuno-Trol targets, and strong agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The method successfully passed three CAP external proficiency tests in 2024, confirming interlaboratory reliability. Coefficients of variation for precision were below 10% for all subsets. Linearity exceeded R2 > 0.99 across clinically relevant ranges. Most subsets demonstrated an LLOQ below 10-50 cells/μL, which is suitable for clinical applications. The proposed modifications to the DuraClone IM kit protocol improved workflow efficiency and analytical performance without compromising accuracy or reproducibility. The validated method provides a standardized, reliable, and time-efficient alternative for lymphocyte subset quantification.

用于TBNK子集定量的优化DuraClone表型试剂盒工作流程的验证。
t细胞、b细胞和nk细胞的定量检测对于诊断和监测免疫疾病以及评估淋巴消耗疗法至关重要。标准化和验证用于外周血TBNK亚群定量的Beckman Coulter DuraClone IM表型基本试剂盒的优化工作流程。程序上的改变包括使用替代的裂解缓冲液,增加计数珠,消除离心步骤,增加采集体积。验证遵循CLSI H42-A2和H62指南,评估准确性、精密度、线性度和定量限(LLOQ)。通过与Immuno-Trol对照的比较和与标准免疫表型方法的Bland-Altman分析来评估准确性。通过参与2024年美国病理学家学院(CAP) TBNK计划来评估外部熟练程度。程序步骤减少了50%,处理时间减少了38.6%。改进后的方法在临床相关范围内具有较高的准确度(- 2 > 0.99)。大多数亚群的LLOQ低于10-50个细胞/μL,适合临床应用。对DuraClone IM试剂盒方案提出的修改提高了工作流程效率和分析性能,同时不影响准确性或可重复性。经过验证的方法为淋巴细胞亚群定量提供了一种标准化、可靠和省时的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytometry Part A
Cytometry Part A 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques. The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome: Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering Biophotonics Bioinformatics Cell Biology Computational Biology Data Science Immunology Parasitology Microbiology Neuroscience Cancer Stem Cells Tissue Regeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信