Budget Impact and Financial Analysis of Outpatient Dalbavancin in an Urban, Non-Teaching, Community Hospital.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Karan Raja, Brandon Chen, Onrina Chandra, Mitesh Patel, Mona Philips
{"title":"Budget Impact and Financial Analysis of Outpatient Dalbavancin in an Urban, Non-Teaching, Community Hospital.","authors":"Karan Raja, Brandon Chen, Onrina Chandra, Mitesh Patel, Mona Philips","doi":"10.1007/s40261-025-01486-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), diabetic foot infections (DFI), and osteomyelitis often require extended antimicrobial therapy courses. Dalbavancin's long half-life allows outpatient or emergency department (ED) management of patients not amenable to oral antimicrobials and/or outpatient infusion.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a budget-impact analysis and real-world assessment of dalbavancin cost and reimbursement data, and model drug acquisition cost-avoidance compared to daptomycin and oral linezolid in outpatient and ED patients at our institution (New Jersey, USA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients treated with dalbavancin in the ED or outpatient wound clinic during the one-year study period with available drug-specific reimbursement data were included. Wholesale acquisition costs were compared between dalbavancin, daptomycin, and oral linezolid. We conducted a regression analysis studying profit changes with patient weight, indication, drug-specific reimbursement, and treatment duration. We fitted a linear mixed-effects model and paired t-test to explore relationships between potential profit and various predictors while accounting for random effects of different indications. Paired t-tests were conducted evaluating potential profit and cost avoidance from the hospital and institutional pharmacy perspective associated with dalbavancin across treatment durations and indications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight individual patient encounters were included in the final analysis. Treatment indications included ABSSSI (48.9%), DFI (33%), diabetic foot osteomyelitis (9%), osteomyelitis (6.8%), and septic arthritis (2.3%). An overall positive reimbursement of approximately US$3500 per patient per encounter was realized. Drug acquisition cost modeling demonstrated variable cost avoidance with dalbavancin compared to daptomycin or oral linezolid based on anticipated treatment duration. Average wholesale acquisition cost difference ranged from a potential loss of US$427.64 to a gain of US$12,557.94 and a loss of US$829.28 to possible gain of US$4370.32 compared to daptomycin and linezolid, respectively, based on treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient dalbavancin utilization presents an opportunity to realize net positive reimbursement and minimize pharmacy drug acquisition costs. Our study suggests that dalbavancin utilization presents significant cost advantages over intravenous daptomycin in both short and long treatment durations and over oral linezolid in long durations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-025-01486-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), diabetic foot infections (DFI), and osteomyelitis often require extended antimicrobial therapy courses. Dalbavancin's long half-life allows outpatient or emergency department (ED) management of patients not amenable to oral antimicrobials and/or outpatient infusion.

Objective: To provide a budget-impact analysis and real-world assessment of dalbavancin cost and reimbursement data, and model drug acquisition cost-avoidance compared to daptomycin and oral linezolid in outpatient and ED patients at our institution (New Jersey, USA).

Methods: All patients treated with dalbavancin in the ED or outpatient wound clinic during the one-year study period with available drug-specific reimbursement data were included. Wholesale acquisition costs were compared between dalbavancin, daptomycin, and oral linezolid. We conducted a regression analysis studying profit changes with patient weight, indication, drug-specific reimbursement, and treatment duration. We fitted a linear mixed-effects model and paired t-test to explore relationships between potential profit and various predictors while accounting for random effects of different indications. Paired t-tests were conducted evaluating potential profit and cost avoidance from the hospital and institutional pharmacy perspective associated with dalbavancin across treatment durations and indications.

Results: Eighty-eight individual patient encounters were included in the final analysis. Treatment indications included ABSSSI (48.9%), DFI (33%), diabetic foot osteomyelitis (9%), osteomyelitis (6.8%), and septic arthritis (2.3%). An overall positive reimbursement of approximately US$3500 per patient per encounter was realized. Drug acquisition cost modeling demonstrated variable cost avoidance with dalbavancin compared to daptomycin or oral linezolid based on anticipated treatment duration. Average wholesale acquisition cost difference ranged from a potential loss of US$427.64 to a gain of US$12,557.94 and a loss of US$829.28 to possible gain of US$4370.32 compared to daptomycin and linezolid, respectively, based on treatment duration.

Conclusions: Outpatient dalbavancin utilization presents an opportunity to realize net positive reimbursement and minimize pharmacy drug acquisition costs. Our study suggests that dalbavancin utilization presents significant cost advantages over intravenous daptomycin in both short and long treatment durations and over oral linezolid in long durations.

城市非教学社区医院门诊达尔巴伐辛的预算影响及财务分析
背景:急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)、糖尿病足感染(DFI)和骨髓炎通常需要延长抗菌治疗疗程。Dalbavancin的长半衰期允许门诊或急诊科(ED)管理不适合口服抗菌剂和/或门诊输注的患者。目的:提供预算影响分析和达巴伐星成本和报销数据的实际评估,以及与达托霉素和口服利奈唑胺相比,我们机构(美国新泽西州)门诊和急诊科患者的模型药物获得成本避免。方法:在一年的研究期间,所有在急诊科或门诊伤口诊所接受达尔巴伐辛治疗的患者都有可获得的药物特异性报销数据。批发采购成本比较达巴文星、达托霉素和口服利奈唑胺。我们进行了回归分析,研究利润随患者体重、适应症、药物特异性报销和治疗时间的变化。我们拟合了线性混合效应模型和配对t检验,以探讨潜在利润与各种预测因子之间的关系,同时考虑不同适应症的随机效应。配对t检验从医院和机构药房的角度评估dalbavancin在治疗持续时间和适应症中的潜在利润和成本避免。结果:88例个体患者被纳入最终分析。治疗指征包括ABSSSI(48.9%)、DFI(33%)、糖尿病足骨髓炎(9%)、骨髓炎(6.8%)、脓毒性关节炎(2.3%)。实现了每名患者每次就诊约3500美元的总体正面报销。药物获取成本模型显示,与达托霉素或口服利奈唑胺相比,基于预期治疗时间,达巴文星可避免可变成本。根据治疗时间,与达托霉素和利奈唑胺相比,平均批发收购成本差异从潜在损失427.64美元到收益12,557.94美元不等,从损失829.28美元到可能收益4370.32美元不等。结论:门诊达尔巴万辛的使用提供了一个实现净正补偿和最小化药房药品获取成本的机会。我们的研究表明,在短期和长期治疗持续时间上,达巴文星的使用都比静脉注射达托霉素具有显著的成本优势,在长期治疗持续时间上比口服利奈唑胺具有明显的成本优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信