Performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 compared to S100B in detecting intracranial injury: influence of age, hemolysis, neurodegenerative diseases, and extracranial fractures in a prospective cohort of over 1,000 patients.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Antoine Puravet, Vincent Sapin, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Bruno Pereira, Julie Durif, Benjamin Bouthors, Farès Moustafa, Jeannot Schmidt, Damien Bouvier, Charlotte Oris
{"title":"Performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 compared to S100B in detecting intracranial injury: influence of age, hemolysis, neurodegenerative diseases, and extracranial fractures in a prospective cohort of over 1,000 patients.","authors":"Antoine Puravet, Vincent Sapin, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Bruno Pereira, Julie Durif, Benjamin Bouthors, Farès Moustafa, Jeannot Schmidt, Damien Bouvier, Charlotte Oris","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-1129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performances of GFAP and UCH-L1 with S100B in detecting intracranial injury, while investigating the impact of confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a large prospective cohort of 1,010 patients with mild traumatic brain injury, we first evaluated the clinical performances of S100B and the GFAP/UCH-L1 combination. To explore the impact of pre-analytical interferences on GFAP and UCH-L1 levels, HIL indices (hemolysis, icterus, lipemia) were measured using the Atellica<sup>®</sup> analyzer, and spiking experiments were performed with increasing concentrations of hemolysate, bilirubin, and Intralipid<sup>®</sup>. We then assessed the influence of four confounders on biomarker specificity: age over 80 years, hemolysis, neurodegenerative diseases, and extracranial fractures. Finally, we evaluated the ability of the biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes at one month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>S100B and the GFAP/UCH-L1 combination showed sensitivities of 96 and 100 %, and specificities of 25 and 27 %, respectively. False positives were significantly associated with age >80 and extracranial fractures for S100B; with age >80 and neurodegenerative diseases for GFAP; and with age >80, hemolysis, and extracranial fractures for UCH-L1. UCH-L1 levels were markedly increased by hemolysis, starting at 400 mg/L of hemoglobin. Age was the only confounding factor to significantly affect specificity. Using age-adjusted thresholds in patients over 80 increased specificity to 30 % for S100B and 33 % for GFAP/UCH-L1. Overall, the biomarkers exhibited limited predictive value and performed poorly for one-month clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>S100B and the GFAP/UCH-L1 combination demonstrated very high sensitivities, close to 100 %, with specificities of approximately 30 % for the diagnosis of intracranial lesions. Age-adjusted thresholds improve specificity in older patients, supporting their clinical implementation. This study also provides the first evidence that hemolysis significantly elevates UCH-L1 concentrations from 400 mg/L of hemoglobin.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performances of GFAP and UCH-L1 with S100B in detecting intracranial injury, while investigating the impact of confounding factors.

Methods: In a large prospective cohort of 1,010 patients with mild traumatic brain injury, we first evaluated the clinical performances of S100B and the GFAP/UCH-L1 combination. To explore the impact of pre-analytical interferences on GFAP and UCH-L1 levels, HIL indices (hemolysis, icterus, lipemia) were measured using the Atellica® analyzer, and spiking experiments were performed with increasing concentrations of hemolysate, bilirubin, and Intralipid®. We then assessed the influence of four confounders on biomarker specificity: age over 80 years, hemolysis, neurodegenerative diseases, and extracranial fractures. Finally, we evaluated the ability of the biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes at one month.

Results: S100B and the GFAP/UCH-L1 combination showed sensitivities of 96 and 100 %, and specificities of 25 and 27 %, respectively. False positives were significantly associated with age >80 and extracranial fractures for S100B; with age >80 and neurodegenerative diseases for GFAP; and with age >80, hemolysis, and extracranial fractures for UCH-L1. UCH-L1 levels were markedly increased by hemolysis, starting at 400 mg/L of hemoglobin. Age was the only confounding factor to significantly affect specificity. Using age-adjusted thresholds in patients over 80 increased specificity to 30 % for S100B and 33 % for GFAP/UCH-L1. Overall, the biomarkers exhibited limited predictive value and performed poorly for one-month clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: S100B and the GFAP/UCH-L1 combination demonstrated very high sensitivities, close to 100 %, with specificities of approximately 30 % for the diagnosis of intracranial lesions. Age-adjusted thresholds improve specificity in older patients, supporting their clinical implementation. This study also provides the first evidence that hemolysis significantly elevates UCH-L1 concentrations from 400 mg/L of hemoglobin.

与S100B相比,GFAP和UCH-L1在检测颅内损伤方面的表现:年龄、溶血、神经退行性疾病和颅外骨折对1000多例患者的影响
目的:比较GFAP、UCH-L1与S100B对颅内损伤的诊断价值,探讨混杂因素对颅内损伤的影响。方法:在1010例轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的大型前瞻性队列中,我们首先评估了S100B和GFAP/UCH-L1联合治疗的临床表现。为了探讨分析前干扰对GFAP和UCH-L1水平的影响,使用Atellica®分析仪测量HIL指数(溶血、黄疸、脂血症),并随着溶血、胆红素和脂质内酯®浓度的增加进行峰值实验。然后,我们评估了四种混杂因素对生物标志物特异性的影响:80岁以上的年龄、溶血、神经退行性疾病和颅外骨折。最后,我们评估了生物标志物在一个月内预测临床结果的能力。结果:S100B和GFAP/UCH-L1联合用药的敏感性分别为96%和100% %,特异性分别为25%和27% %。假阳性与年龄bbb80和S100B颅外骨折显著相关;年龄≥80岁,伴有神经退行性疾病;年龄80岁,有溶血和颅内外骨折。溶血使UCH-L1水平显著升高,从400 mg/L血红蛋白开始。年龄是唯一显著影响特异性的混杂因素。在80岁以上的患者中使用年龄调整阈值将S100B的特异性提高到30 %,GFAP/UCH-L1的特异性提高到33 %。总的来说,生物标志物的预测价值有限,对一个月的临床结果表现不佳。结论:S100B与GFAP/UCH-L1联合诊断颅内病变的敏感性非常高,接近100% %,特异性约为30 %。年龄调整阈值提高了老年患者的特异性,支持其临床实施。本研究还首次提供了溶血可显著提高血红蛋白400 mg/L UCH-L1浓度的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信