Incidence, mortality, and survival associated with acute leukaemia subtypes by age group in China: a population-based cancer registry analysis and cohort study.

Wei Yin,Xiaoyu Yan,Jiaoyang Cai,Bingfeng Han,Peng Yin,Gang Lu,Wenyan Cheng,Jianan Zhang,Huiyi Wu,Jiaqi Ren,Pengyu Ren,Zifang Zhou,Haibo Wang,Ying Shi,Lanxia Gan,Depei Wu,Jie Jin,Yongping Song,Zhongxing Jiang,Xiaojing Yan,Ting Niu,Yu Hu,Fei Li,Sujun Gao,Tao Cheng,Jianxiang Wang,Xi Zhang,Xiaojun Huang,Qifa Liu,Xiaoyu Zhu,Pengcheng He,Yuqing Chen,Tonghua Yang,Jianyong Li,Xudong Wei,Yongrong Lai,Jishi Wang,Jinsong Yan,Jie Yu,Xiaofan Zhu,Weiqun Xu,Yufeng Liu,Ju Gao,Hua Jiang,Yongzhi Zheng,Hua Wang,Yunyan He,Yongjun Fang,Shuhong Shen,Jing Chen,Bing Chen,Sujiang Zhang,Yang Shen,Jin Wang,Jianqing Mi,Weili Zhao,Hao Zhang,Maigeng Zhou,Wenqiang Wei,Jie He,Zhu Chen,Sai-Juan Chen, ,
{"title":"Incidence, mortality, and survival associated with acute leukaemia subtypes by age group in China: a population-based cancer registry analysis and cohort study.","authors":"Wei Yin,Xiaoyu Yan,Jiaoyang Cai,Bingfeng Han,Peng Yin,Gang Lu,Wenyan Cheng,Jianan Zhang,Huiyi Wu,Jiaqi Ren,Pengyu Ren,Zifang Zhou,Haibo Wang,Ying Shi,Lanxia Gan,Depei Wu,Jie Jin,Yongping Song,Zhongxing Jiang,Xiaojing Yan,Ting Niu,Yu Hu,Fei Li,Sujun Gao,Tao Cheng,Jianxiang Wang,Xi Zhang,Xiaojun Huang,Qifa Liu,Xiaoyu Zhu,Pengcheng He,Yuqing Chen,Tonghua Yang,Jianyong Li,Xudong Wei,Yongrong Lai,Jishi Wang,Jinsong Yan,Jie Yu,Xiaofan Zhu,Weiqun Xu,Yufeng Liu,Ju Gao,Hua Jiang,Yongzhi Zheng,Hua Wang,Yunyan He,Yongjun Fang,Shuhong Shen,Jing Chen,Bing Chen,Sujiang Zhang,Yang Shen,Jin Wang,Jianqing Mi,Weili Zhao,Hao Zhang,Maigeng Zhou,Wenqiang Wei,Jie He,Zhu Chen,Sai-Juan Chen, , ","doi":"10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00236-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAcute leukaemia represents a crucial health challenge. However, nationwide data delineating the incidence of acute leukaemia subtypes, as well as mortality and survival outcomes, remain scarce in China. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology of acute leukaemia subtypes across China.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a population-based cancer registry analysis and cohort study in China, by integrating data from five national databases through unique national identification numbers. The main outcomes were age-standardised rates (ASRs) for incidence and mortality and overall survival for acute leukaemia subtypes. Acute leukaemia incidence and mortality data in 2019 were extracted from National Cancer Centre (NCC) registries linked to the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS), stratified by age, sex, and region. ASRs were calculated with Segi's world standard population with 95% CIs across the general population. For the survival analysis, we established a cohort from the Chinese Childhood Leukaemia Registry (33 530 children aged 0-14 years) and National Adult Acute Leukaemia Registry of China (71 477 adults aged ≥15 years) for 2016-20, integrated with the Cause of Death Reporting System and HQMS. Patients were stratified by subtype, age, sex, region, molecular characteristics, treatment modalities, and diagnosis period (2016-18 vs 2019-20). Overall survival and cause-specific survival were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method at multiple timepoints (1 month, and year 1 to year 5) in our cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nBased on NCC registries covering a population of 628·4 million, we estimated 43 275 new acute leukaemia cases and 27 049 deaths in 2019 in China, with an ASR for incidence 2·83 (95% CI 2·78-2·88) per 100 000 population and an ASR for mortality of 1·51 (1·48-1·54) per 100 000 population. The ASR for the incidence of non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia-acute myeloid leukaemia was 1·24 (95% CI 1·21-1·26) per 100 000 population, that of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was 0·92 (0·89-0·95) per 100 000 population, and that of acute promyelocytic leukaemia was 0·22 (0·21-0·23) per 100 000 population. The incidence of acute leukaemia spiked in children aged 1-4 years (4·54 per 100 000), then declined, and then rose markedly after age 60 years, peaking at 9·33 per 100 000 in people aged 75-79 years, before declining, while overall mortality remained relatively low across younger age groups (0-44 years), then increased progressively with advancing age, from 1·23 per 100 000 in adults aged 45-49 years to 8·77 per 100 000 in those aged 80-84 years. In children, 5-year overall survival was 66·5% (95% CI 65·3-67·9) for non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia acute myeloid leukaemia, 91·1% (89·6-92·6) for acute promyelocytic leukaemia, and 85·4% (84·9-85·8) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; in adults, 5-year overall survival was 23·9% (23·4-24·3) for non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia acute myeloid leukaemia, 82·5% (81·7-83·4) for acute promyelocytic leukaemia, and 30·1% (29·2-30·9) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Survival improved in the more recent period (2019-20 vs 2016-18: hazard ratio 0·97 [95% CI 0·95-0·99]; p=0·0014), particularly among younger adults with non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia acute myeloid leukaemia (aged <60 years) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (aged <40 years), with improvements primarily attributable to expanded application of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. However, prognosis remained poor in patients with acute leukaemia aged 60 years and older (5-year overall survival 14·9% [95% CI 14·3-15·5] in patients aged 60-74 years, and 4·8% [4·2-5·4] in patients aged ≥75 years).\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nThis comprehensive nationwide study of acute leukaemia incidence, mortality and survival outcomes across China establishes age-specific epidemiological benchmarks, enabling ongoing risk factor monitoring, while supporting expanded transplantation access for eligible patients and highlighting the urgent need for novel, less toxic therapies for older patients who bear a disproportionately higher disease burden.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Double First-Class Project, Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Shanghai Guangci Translational Medical Research Development Foundation, and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences.\r\n\r\nTRANSLATIONS\r\nFor the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.","PeriodicalId":501011,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Haematology","volume":"34 1","pages":"e808-e822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00236-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Acute leukaemia represents a crucial health challenge. However, nationwide data delineating the incidence of acute leukaemia subtypes, as well as mortality and survival outcomes, remain scarce in China. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology of acute leukaemia subtypes across China. METHODS We conducted a population-based cancer registry analysis and cohort study in China, by integrating data from five national databases through unique national identification numbers. The main outcomes were age-standardised rates (ASRs) for incidence and mortality and overall survival for acute leukaemia subtypes. Acute leukaemia incidence and mortality data in 2019 were extracted from National Cancer Centre (NCC) registries linked to the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS), stratified by age, sex, and region. ASRs were calculated with Segi's world standard population with 95% CIs across the general population. For the survival analysis, we established a cohort from the Chinese Childhood Leukaemia Registry (33 530 children aged 0-14 years) and National Adult Acute Leukaemia Registry of China (71 477 adults aged ≥15 years) for 2016-20, integrated with the Cause of Death Reporting System and HQMS. Patients were stratified by subtype, age, sex, region, molecular characteristics, treatment modalities, and diagnosis period (2016-18 vs 2019-20). Overall survival and cause-specific survival were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method at multiple timepoints (1 month, and year 1 to year 5) in our cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. FINDINGS Based on NCC registries covering a population of 628·4 million, we estimated 43 275 new acute leukaemia cases and 27 049 deaths in 2019 in China, with an ASR for incidence 2·83 (95% CI 2·78-2·88) per 100 000 population and an ASR for mortality of 1·51 (1·48-1·54) per 100 000 population. The ASR for the incidence of non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia-acute myeloid leukaemia was 1·24 (95% CI 1·21-1·26) per 100 000 population, that of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was 0·92 (0·89-0·95) per 100 000 population, and that of acute promyelocytic leukaemia was 0·22 (0·21-0·23) per 100 000 population. The incidence of acute leukaemia spiked in children aged 1-4 years (4·54 per 100 000), then declined, and then rose markedly after age 60 years, peaking at 9·33 per 100 000 in people aged 75-79 years, before declining, while overall mortality remained relatively low across younger age groups (0-44 years), then increased progressively with advancing age, from 1·23 per 100 000 in adults aged 45-49 years to 8·77 per 100 000 in those aged 80-84 years. In children, 5-year overall survival was 66·5% (95% CI 65·3-67·9) for non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia acute myeloid leukaemia, 91·1% (89·6-92·6) for acute promyelocytic leukaemia, and 85·4% (84·9-85·8) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; in adults, 5-year overall survival was 23·9% (23·4-24·3) for non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia acute myeloid leukaemia, 82·5% (81·7-83·4) for acute promyelocytic leukaemia, and 30·1% (29·2-30·9) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Survival improved in the more recent period (2019-20 vs 2016-18: hazard ratio 0·97 [95% CI 0·95-0·99]; p=0·0014), particularly among younger adults with non-acute promyelocytic leukaemia acute myeloid leukaemia (aged <60 years) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (aged <40 years), with improvements primarily attributable to expanded application of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. However, prognosis remained poor in patients with acute leukaemia aged 60 years and older (5-year overall survival 14·9% [95% CI 14·3-15·5] in patients aged 60-74 years, and 4·8% [4·2-5·4] in patients aged ≥75 years). INTERPRETATION This comprehensive nationwide study of acute leukaemia incidence, mortality and survival outcomes across China establishes age-specific epidemiological benchmarks, enabling ongoing risk factor monitoring, while supporting expanded transplantation access for eligible patients and highlighting the urgent need for novel, less toxic therapies for older patients who bear a disproportionately higher disease burden. FUNDING State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Double First-Class Project, Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Shanghai Guangci Translational Medical Research Development Foundation, and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences. TRANSLATIONS For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
背景:急性白血病是一项重大的健康挑战。然而,在中国,关于急性白血病亚型发病率以及死亡率和生存结局的全国性数据仍然很少。我们旨在全面评估中国急性白血病亚型的流行病学。方法:我们在中国进行了一项基于人群的癌症登记分析和队列研究,通过独特的国家识别号码整合了来自五个国家数据库的数据。主要结果是急性白血病亚型的发病率和死亡率的年龄标准化率(ASRs)和总生存率。2019年急性白血病发病率和死亡率数据提取自与医院质量监测系统(HQMS)相关的国家癌症中心(NCC)登记处,按年龄、性别和地区分层。根据Segi世界标准人群计算asr,在一般人群中ci为95%。为了进行生存分析,我们建立了一个2016- 2020年中国儿童白血病登记处(33 530名0-14岁儿童)和中国成人急性白血病登记处(71 477名年龄≥15岁的成年人)的队列,并整合了死因报告系统和HQMS。患者按亚型、年龄、性别、地区、分子特征、治疗方式和诊断期(2016- 2018 vs 2019- 2020)进行分层。在我们的队列中,使用Kaplan-Meier方法在多个时间点(1个月,1年至5年)评估总生存率和病因特异性生存率。多因素Cox回归分析确定预后因素。研究结果:基于覆盖6.284亿人口的NCC登记处,我们估计2019年中国有43 275例新发急性白血病病例和27 049例死亡,发病率ASR为每10万人2.83 (95% CI为2.78 - 2.88),死亡率ASR为每10万人1.51(1.48 - 1.54)。非急性早幼粒细胞白血病-急性髓性白血病发病率的ASR为每10万人1.24 (95% CI为1.21 ~ 1.26),急性淋巴细胞白血病发病率为每10万人0.92(0.89 ~ 0.95),急性早幼粒细胞白血病发病率为每10万人0.22(0.21 ~ 0.23)。急性白血病的发病率在1-4岁儿童中急剧上升(每10万人中有4.54人),然后下降,60岁后显著上升,75-79岁的人达到9.33 / 10万人的峰值,然后下降,而较年轻年龄组(0-44岁)的总死亡率相对较低,然后随着年龄的增长逐渐增加,从45-49岁成人的1.23 / 10万人增加到80-84岁成人的8.77 / 10万人。在儿童中,非急性早幼粒细胞白血病的5年总生存率为66.5% (95% CI为65.3 - 67.9),急性早幼粒细胞白血病的5年总生存率为91%(86.9 - 92.6),急性淋巴细胞白血病的5年总生存率为85.4% (89.4 - 88.5);在成人中,非急性早幼粒细胞白血病的5年总生存率为23.9%(23.4 - 24.3),急性早幼粒细胞白血病的5年总生存率为82.5%(87.1 - 83.4),急性淋巴细胞白血病的5年总生存率为30.1%(29.2 - 30.9)。在最近一段时间(2019- 2020年vs 2016- 2018年:风险比0.97 [95% CI 0.95 - 0.99]; p= 0.0014),特别是在患有非急性早幼粒细胞白血病、急性髓性白血病(年龄<60岁)和急性淋巴细胞白血病(年龄<40岁)的年轻人中,生存率有所提高,主要归因于异体造血干细胞移植的扩大应用。然而,60岁及以上急性白血病患者的预后仍然较差(60-74岁患者的5年总生存率为14.9% [95% CI 14.3 - 15.5],≥75岁患者的5年总生存率为4.8%[4.2 - 5.4])。这项针对中国急性白血病发病率、死亡率和生存结果的全国性综合研究建立了特定年龄的流行病学基准,实现了持续的风险因素监测,同时支持扩大符合条件的患者的移植可及性,并强调迫切需要新的、毒性更低的治疗方法来治疗承受不成比例更高疾病负担的老年患者。医学基因组学国家重点实验室、双一流项目、学科创新引进海外人才项目、国家自然科学基金、上海市地方高水平大学创新研究团队、上海广慈转化医学研究发展基金、CAMS医学科学创新基金。摘要的中文翻译见补充资料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信