Investigating Short-term Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization After Traditional Versus Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Mark A Plantz, Steven Kurapaty, Michael P Foy, Erik B Gerlach, Kevin Hardt
{"title":"Investigating Short-term Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization After Traditional Versus Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Mark A Plantz, Steven Kurapaty, Michael P Foy, Erik B Gerlach, Kevin Hardt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of various short-term complications and healthcare utilization between traditional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CA-TKA). Traditional TKA and CA-TKA cases were extracted from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were matched using patient and demographic variables. Outcomes were compared between the two patient groups after exact matching. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for various outcome measures. The authors identified 159,521 patients that underwent traditional TKA and 3,464 patients that underwent CA-TKA. After matching, CA-TKA patients were more likely to have a nonhome discharge and a hospital length of stay greater than 2 days. Other outcome measures-readmission, reoperation, mortality, and surgical/medical complications-were comparable between groups. Patients undergoing computer-assisted TKA were more likely to have a nonhome discharge and a hospital length of stay greater than 2 days. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(3):156-160, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"34 3","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of various short-term complications and healthcare utilization between traditional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CA-TKA). Traditional TKA and CA-TKA cases were extracted from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients were matched using patient and demographic variables. Outcomes were compared between the two patient groups after exact matching. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for various outcome measures. The authors identified 159,521 patients that underwent traditional TKA and 3,464 patients that underwent CA-TKA. After matching, CA-TKA patients were more likely to have a nonhome discharge and a hospital length of stay greater than 2 days. Other outcome measures-readmission, reoperation, mortality, and surgical/medical complications-were comparable between groups. Patients undergoing computer-assisted TKA were more likely to have a nonhome discharge and a hospital length of stay greater than 2 days. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(3):156-160, 2025).

调查传统与计算机辅助全膝关节置换术后的短期疗效和医疗保健利用。
本研究的目的是比较传统和计算机辅助全膝关节置换术(CA-TKA)的各种短期并发症的发生率和医疗保健利用。传统TKA和CA-TKA病例摘自美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划。使用患者和人口统计学变量对患者进行匹配。在精确匹配后比较两组患者的结果。采用多变量逻辑回归来确定各种结果测量的独立危险因素。作者确定了159521例接受传统TKA的患者和3464例接受CA-TKA的患者。匹配后,CA-TKA患者更有可能有非家庭出院和住院时间大于2天。其他结果测量-再入院,再手术,死亡率和手术/医疗并发症-组间具有可比性。接受计算机辅助TKA的患者更有可能是非家庭出院,住院时间大于2天。[j] .外科骨科进展,34(3):156- 160,2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信