Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance: A methodological study.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Hediye Özbay, Seher Çevik Aktura
{"title":"Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance: A methodological study.","authors":"Hediye Özbay, Seher Çevik Aktura","doi":"10.1177/11297298251381133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological design was employed between February and May 2025, involving a sample of 276 nurses. Participants were drawn from emergency departments, internal medicine units, surgical wards, and intensive care units across hospitals in two provinces in eastern Turkey. Data were collected using two instruments: the Nurses' Information Form and the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, medians, and minimum and maximum values, were used to describe participant characteristics. Content validity was assessed through expert review, and the Content Validity Index was calculated using the Davis technique. Item discrimination and difficulty indices were computed using Microsoft Excel. Reliability analysis involved calculation of the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) coefficient, alongside item-total score correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The KR-20 coefficient for the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance was 0.974. Analysis of the test mean scores revealed that the items were generally easy but exhibited high discriminatory power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance demonstrated high reliability, as evidenced by its KR-20 value. The use of this questionnaire enables the identification of knowledge gaps among nursing professionals regarding best practices in short peripheral catheter care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251381133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251381133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance.

Methods: A methodological design was employed between February and May 2025, involving a sample of 276 nurses. Participants were drawn from emergency departments, internal medicine units, surgical wards, and intensive care units across hospitals in two provinces in eastern Turkey. Data were collected using two instruments: the Nurses' Information Form and the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, medians, and minimum and maximum values, were used to describe participant characteristics. Content validity was assessed through expert review, and the Content Validity Index was calculated using the Davis technique. Item discrimination and difficulty indices were computed using Microsoft Excel. Reliability analysis involved calculation of the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) coefficient, alongside item-total score correlation analysis.

Results: The KR-20 coefficient for the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance was 0.974. Analysis of the test mean scores revealed that the items were generally easy but exhibited high discriminatory power.

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Best Practices for Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance demonstrated high reliability, as evidenced by its KR-20 value. The use of this questionnaire enables the identification of knowledge gaps among nursing professionals regarding best practices in short peripheral catheter care.

土耳其版短周静脉导管维持最佳实践问卷的效度和信度研究:一项方法学研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估土耳其版短周静脉导管维持最佳实践问卷的效度和可靠性。方法:采用方法学设计,于2025年2月至5月对276名护士进行调查。参与者来自土耳其东部两个省各医院的急诊科、内科、外科病房和重症监护病房。数据收集使用两种工具:护士信息表和短时间外周静脉导管维持最佳实践问卷。描述性统计,包括频率、百分比、平均值、标准差、中位数、最小值和最大值,用于描述参与者的特征。采用专家评审法评估内容效度,采用Davis技术计算内容效度指数。采用Microsoft Excel计算项目区分度和难度指数。信度分析包括计算库德-理查德森公式20 (KR-20)系数,以及项目总分相关分析。结果:短周静脉置管维持最佳实践问卷的KR-20系数为0.974。对测试平均分数的分析表明,这些题目一般都很容易,但却表现出很高的歧视力。结论:土耳其版短周静脉导管维持最佳实践问卷具有较高的可靠性,其KR-20值证明了这一点。使用此问卷可以识别护理专业人员之间关于短周导管护理最佳实践的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信