Zachary A Matthay, Gabriella A Camacho, Alexandra Sansosti, Joshua Herbert, Sean Kalloo, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Virendra I Patel, Nicholas J Morrissey
{"title":"Surgical revision to salvage degeneration of hemodialysis access is effective but is associated with a high burden of reinterventions.","authors":"Zachary A Matthay, Gabriella A Camacho, Alexandra Sansosti, Joshua Herbert, Sean Kalloo, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Virendra I Patel, Nicholas J Morrissey","doi":"10.1177/11297298251382876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aneurysmal degeneration and ulceration of arteriovenous access (AV-access) for hemodialysis is a morbid and potentially lethal scenario. Outcomes of surgical revision to salvage failing AV-access versus ligation followed by new access creation are not well described. We hypothesized that surgical revision would be associated with reduced tunneled dialysis catheter use but increased reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single center retrospective study included all adult patients with aneurysmal, ulcerated, or bleeding AV-accesses undergoing surgical revision or ligation (2020-2023). Univariate statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared characteristics and outcomes across groups. The decision to salvage versus ligate AV-access was based on the clinical judgment of the treating surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort of 89 patients had a median age of 61 years and expected high rates of comorbidities which were not different between groups, including diabetes (45%), coronary artery disease (40%), and heart failure (37%). Of the 89 patients included, 15 had AV grafts and 74 had AV fistulas. The indications for intervention included aneurysmal degeneration alone (<i>n</i> = 39), ulceration (<i>n</i> = 24), and ulceration with bleeding (<i>n</i> = 26). Underlying aneurysmal degeneration was present in 72% of patients with ulceration and bleeding. Surgical revision to salvage AV-access was associated with reduced dialysis catheter use compared to ligation-44% after revision compared to 81% after ligation (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and fewer overall postoperative days with a dialysis catheter after surgery (<i>p</i> < 0.02). Reinterventions were more common after open revision versus ligation (58% vs 32%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), but only 5 patients (10%) in the open revision group required placement of a new surgical access during the follow up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a high rate of reinterventions, patients who underwent an open revision to salvage their av-access had significantly reduced dialysis catheter utilization and few required new surgical access creations. AV-access salvage should be considered for failing AV-access whenever possible to mitigate dialysis catheter-associated complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251382876"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251382876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal degeneration and ulceration of arteriovenous access (AV-access) for hemodialysis is a morbid and potentially lethal scenario. Outcomes of surgical revision to salvage failing AV-access versus ligation followed by new access creation are not well described. We hypothesized that surgical revision would be associated with reduced tunneled dialysis catheter use but increased reinterventions.
Methods: This single center retrospective study included all adult patients with aneurysmal, ulcerated, or bleeding AV-accesses undergoing surgical revision or ligation (2020-2023). Univariate statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared characteristics and outcomes across groups. The decision to salvage versus ligate AV-access was based on the clinical judgment of the treating surgeon.
Results: The cohort of 89 patients had a median age of 61 years and expected high rates of comorbidities which were not different between groups, including diabetes (45%), coronary artery disease (40%), and heart failure (37%). Of the 89 patients included, 15 had AV grafts and 74 had AV fistulas. The indications for intervention included aneurysmal degeneration alone (n = 39), ulceration (n = 24), and ulceration with bleeding (n = 26). Underlying aneurysmal degeneration was present in 72% of patients with ulceration and bleeding. Surgical revision to salvage AV-access was associated with reduced dialysis catheter use compared to ligation-44% after revision compared to 81% after ligation (p < 0.01) and fewer overall postoperative days with a dialysis catheter after surgery (p < 0.02). Reinterventions were more common after open revision versus ligation (58% vs 32%, p = 0.03), but only 5 patients (10%) in the open revision group required placement of a new surgical access during the follow up period.
Conclusions: Despite a high rate of reinterventions, patients who underwent an open revision to salvage their av-access had significantly reduced dialysis catheter utilization and few required new surgical access creations. AV-access salvage should be considered for failing AV-access whenever possible to mitigate dialysis catheter-associated complications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.