Age at menopause and the progression of frailty among middle-aged and older women: A prospective cohort analysis from CHARLS.

IF 3.6
Xinyue Zhang, Wei Yu, Yueqin Zhu, Runfei Zhang, Yuhua Zhang
{"title":"Age at menopause and the progression of frailty among middle-aged and older women: A prospective cohort analysis from CHARLS.","authors":"Xinyue Zhang, Wei Yu, Yueqin Zhu, Runfei Zhang, Yuhua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Menopause marks an important transition in women's health, with the age at menopause influencing a variety of later-life health risks. However, the impact of menopause timing on longitudinal progression of frailty among Chinese middle-aged and older women remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study from 2011 to 2018. A total of 11,984 women aged 45 years and older who experienced natural menopause were included. Frailty index was calculated using 30 health deficits encompassing physical, cognitive, and psychological domains. Age at menopause was categorized as <40, 40-44, 45-49, 50-55, and > 55 years. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to examine the association between age at menopause and frailty progression, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-related confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women who experienced menopause after age 55 exhibited the fastest frailty progression compared with those with menopause at age 50-55 (fully adjusted β = 0.43; 95 % confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.81; P = 0.027). Women who underwent menopause at ages 40-44 also had a significantly accelerated frailty progression (β = 0.35; 95 % confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.64; P = 0.016). In contrast, premature ovarian insufficiency (<40 years) was associated with lower baseline frailty index and a slower progression of frailty during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both early and late menopause are associated with accelerated frailty progression among Chinese middle-aged and older women. These findings highlight the need for early identification and targeted preventative interventions in women at risk of atypical menopause timing to promote healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"202 ","pages":"108742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maturitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Menopause marks an important transition in women's health, with the age at menopause influencing a variety of later-life health risks. However, the impact of menopause timing on longitudinal progression of frailty among Chinese middle-aged and older women remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study from 2011 to 2018. A total of 11,984 women aged 45 years and older who experienced natural menopause were included. Frailty index was calculated using 30 health deficits encompassing physical, cognitive, and psychological domains. Age at menopause was categorized as <40, 40-44, 45-49, 50-55, and > 55 years. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to examine the association between age at menopause and frailty progression, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-related confounders.

Results: Women who experienced menopause after age 55 exhibited the fastest frailty progression compared with those with menopause at age 50-55 (fully adjusted β = 0.43; 95 % confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.81; P = 0.027). Women who underwent menopause at ages 40-44 also had a significantly accelerated frailty progression (β = 0.35; 95 % confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.64; P = 0.016). In contrast, premature ovarian insufficiency (<40 years) was associated with lower baseline frailty index and a slower progression of frailty during follow-up.

Conclusions: Both early and late menopause are associated with accelerated frailty progression among Chinese middle-aged and older women. These findings highlight the need for early identification and targeted preventative interventions in women at risk of atypical menopause timing to promote healthy aging.

绝经年龄与中老年妇女衰弱的进展:CHARLS的前瞻性队列分析。
目的:绝经标志着妇女健康的一个重要转变,绝经年龄影响着各种晚年健康风险。然而,绝经时间对中国中老年妇女衰弱纵向进展的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们使用2011 - 2018年中国健康与退休纵向研究的数据进行前瞻性队列研究。共有11,984名45岁及以上经历自然更年期的妇女被纳入研究。虚弱指数是用30个健康缺陷来计算的,包括身体、认知和心理领域。绝经年龄为55岁。混合效应线性回归模型用于检验绝经年龄与衰弱进展之间的关系,调整社会人口统计学、生活方式和健康相关混杂因素。结果:55岁以后绝经的妇女与50-55岁绝经的妇女相比,衰弱进展最快(完全调整β = 0.43; 95%可信区间,0.05 ~ 0.81;P = 0.027)。40-44岁绝经的妇女也有明显加速的衰弱进展(β = 0.35; 95%可信区间,0.07至0.64;P = 0.016)。结论:在中国中老年妇女中,早绝经和晚绝经都与虚弱的加速进展有关。这些发现强调了对有非典型更年期风险的妇女进行早期识别和有针对性的预防干预以促进健康老龄化的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信