Shori Gerardot, Matthew Pope-Filos, Bronte Yono, Kamal Patel, Bryan Roberts, Sangeetha Nanthabalan
{"title":"Central venous access devices: Retrospective study of the implementation of a nursing led vascular access team and evaluation of complication rates.","authors":"Shori Gerardot, Matthew Pope-Filos, Bronte Yono, Kamal Patel, Bryan Roberts, Sangeetha Nanthabalan","doi":"10.1177/11297298251376977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physicians have historically performed insertions of Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs). The ability to successfully place CVADs has increased with the implementation of ultrasound techniques to include safer placement and lower complications. The implementation of nursing lead vascular access teams (VATs) has become popular in hospitals for securing and maintaining access. This study aims to review a nursing lead team placing CVADs in comparison to physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a retrospective single center study. Utilizing the VAT nurse procedure logs from 01/01/2019 to 06/30/2021, evaluation using chart review was performed to assess for: performing team, location of access, and any complications during and after the placement of central access. The data was stored on REDCAP data analysis tool without any protected health identification. After all the data was collected, it was sent for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the primary outcome was an evaluation for difference in immediate complications between the physician and VAT group in insertion of CVADs. Analysis of 395 procedures for complications, including both Femoral (82) and Jugular (313) CVADs were evaluated based on the inserting team, physician (131) and VAT staff (264). The procedures were compared for immediate and delayed complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The complication rates and success rates were similar in both groups. Despite the study lacking enough power to be statistically significant, the outcomes of this study are promising, introducing new pathways for vascular access to accommodate both non-critically and critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251376977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251376977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Physicians have historically performed insertions of Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs). The ability to successfully place CVADs has increased with the implementation of ultrasound techniques to include safer placement and lower complications. The implementation of nursing lead vascular access teams (VATs) has become popular in hospitals for securing and maintaining access. This study aims to review a nursing lead team placing CVADs in comparison to physicians.
Methods: The study was a retrospective single center study. Utilizing the VAT nurse procedure logs from 01/01/2019 to 06/30/2021, evaluation using chart review was performed to assess for: performing team, location of access, and any complications during and after the placement of central access. The data was stored on REDCAP data analysis tool without any protected health identification. After all the data was collected, it was sent for statistical analysis.
Results: In this study, the primary outcome was an evaluation for difference in immediate complications between the physician and VAT group in insertion of CVADs. Analysis of 395 procedures for complications, including both Femoral (82) and Jugular (313) CVADs were evaluated based on the inserting team, physician (131) and VAT staff (264). The procedures were compared for immediate and delayed complications.
Discussion: The complication rates and success rates were similar in both groups. Despite the study lacking enough power to be statistically significant, the outcomes of this study are promising, introducing new pathways for vascular access to accommodate both non-critically and critically ill patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.