A feasibility study of digital self-report measurement for brain injury patients utilizing an adapted version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - fourth edition.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Mikael Gewers, Kristian Borg, Uno Fors, Sabine Koch, Marika C Möller, Aniko Bartfai
{"title":"A feasibility study of digital self-report measurement for brain injury patients utilizing an adapted version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - fourth edition.","authors":"Mikael Gewers, Kristian Borg, Uno Fors, Sabine Koch, Marika C Möller, Aniko Bartfai","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.43644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the clinical relevance and usability of the digital self-report version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - fourth edition, MPAI-4 (MPAI-4-S-dig). In its paper version, MPAI-4 is well validated for patients with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) and neurological disorders (NDs), but time consuming. An additional aim was to investigate whether MPAI-4-S-dig is reliable for repeated measurements.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community neurorehabilitation in Stockholm, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPAI-4-S-dig was administered to 40 patients with ABI or ND 2 weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); clinical relevance of data was assessed through Pearson's Correlation Coefficient with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised (CIQ-R), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC values ranged from 0.86 to 0.93 for total and subscales. Significant correlations were found between MPAI-4-S-dig participation and CIQ-R Total, social integration and home integration and MoCA naming, MPAI-4-S-dig adjustment and CIQ-R Social integration, MPAI-4-S-dig Total and all subscale scores and HADS Anxiety score, MPAI-4-S-dig Total, abilities and participation and HADS Depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The demonstrated reliability and clinical relevance of MPAI-4-S-dig for patients undergoing neurorehabilitation permits the implementation of digital data capture in patients with mild acquired cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm43644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.43644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the clinical relevance and usability of the digital self-report version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - fourth edition, MPAI-4 (MPAI-4-S-dig). In its paper version, MPAI-4 is well validated for patients with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) and neurological disorders (NDs), but time consuming. An additional aim was to investigate whether MPAI-4-S-dig is reliable for repeated measurements.

Setting: Community neurorehabilitation in Stockholm, Sweden.

Methods: MPAI-4-S-dig was administered to 40 patients with ABI or ND 2 weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); clinical relevance of data was assessed through Pearson's Correlation Coefficient with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised (CIQ-R), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Results: ICC values ranged from 0.86 to 0.93 for total and subscales. Significant correlations were found between MPAI-4-S-dig participation and CIQ-R Total, social integration and home integration and MoCA naming, MPAI-4-S-dig adjustment and CIQ-R Social integration, MPAI-4-S-dig Total and all subscale scores and HADS Anxiety score, MPAI-4-S-dig Total, abilities and participation and HADS Depression.

Conclusion: The demonstrated reliability and clinical relevance of MPAI-4-S-dig for patients undergoing neurorehabilitation permits the implementation of digital data capture in patients with mild acquired cognitive impairment.

利用梅奥-波特兰适应性量表第四版对脑损伤患者进行数字化自我报告测量的可行性研究。
目的:本研究旨在检验数字自我报告版梅奥-波特兰适应性量表第四版MPAI-4 (MPAI-4- s -dig)的临床相关性和可用性。在其论文版本中,MPAI-4在获得性脑损伤(ABIs)和神经系统疾病(ndds)患者中得到了很好的验证,但耗时较长。另一个目的是研究MPAI-4-S-dig对于重复测量是否可靠。地点:瑞典斯德哥尔摩的社区神经康复中心。方法:对40例ABI或ND患者进行MPAI-4-S-dig治疗,间隔2周。采用类内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度;通过Pearson相关系数与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、修订社区融入问卷(CIQ-R)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估数据的临床相关性。结果:总量表和亚量表的ICC值在0.86 ~ 0.93之间。MPAI-4-S-dig参与与CIQ-R总分、社会整合和家庭整合与MoCA命名、MPAI-4-S-dig调整与CIQ-R社会整合、MPAI-4-S-dig总分和所有子量表得分与HADS焦虑评分、MPAI-4-S-dig总分、能力和参与与HADS抑郁之间存在显著相关。结论:MPAI-4-S-dig对接受神经康复治疗的患者的可靠性和临床相关性允许在轻度获得性认知障碍患者中实施数字数据捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信