CT-Based Habitat Model for Predicting Tumor Response and Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization Combining Molecular Targeted Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
IF 3.9 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiao Shen, Jin-Xing Zhang, Hai-Tao Yan, Jin Liu, Sheng Liu, Hai-Bin Shi, Qing-Quan Zu
{"title":"CT-Based Habitat Model for Predicting Tumor Response and Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization Combining Molecular Targeted Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.","authors":"Xiao Shen, Jin-Xing Zhang, Hai-Tao Yan, Jin Liu, Sheng Liu, Hai-Bin Shi, Qing-Quan Zu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a CT-based habitat model for predicting tumor response and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization, combined with molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (TACE-MTAs-ICIs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 200 patients treated with TACE-MTAs-ICIs between June 2019 and August 2024 were retrospectively included. Voxel-level radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT images, and tumor habitats were identified using K-means clustering. Radiomic features were extracted from both habitat subregions and the entire tumor volume (conventional radiomics). A support vector machine (SVM) model was developed to predict tumor response, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis applied for interpretability. In parallel, a Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to predict OS. Independent clinical risk factors were incorporated with radiomic features to build a combined model. Model performance was evaluated and compared using multiple statistical metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test cohort, the habitat model achieved strong performance for tumor response prediction (AUC: 0.881) and OS stratification (C-index: 0.703; 1-year AUC: 0.788; 2-year AUC: 0.806), outperforming the conventional radiomics model. Notably, the integrated model combining habitat features and clinical variables further improved predictive accuracy, yielding an AUC of 0.884 for response prediction and superior OS discrimination (C-index: 0.749; 1-year AUC: 0.831; 2-year AUC: 0.841).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed CT-based habitat model enables a more accurate and interpretable assessment of treatment response and OS in HCC, offering valuable noninvasive biomarkers that reflect intra-tumor heterogeneity. This approach holds promise for improving individualized treatment planning and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data availability statement: </strong>The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To develop and validate a CT-based habitat model for predicting tumor response and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization, combined with molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (TACE-MTAs-ICIs).
Materials and methods: A total of 200 patients treated with TACE-MTAs-ICIs between June 2019 and August 2024 were retrospectively included. Voxel-level radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT images, and tumor habitats were identified using K-means clustering. Radiomic features were extracted from both habitat subregions and the entire tumor volume (conventional radiomics). A support vector machine (SVM) model was developed to predict tumor response, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis applied for interpretability. In parallel, a Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to predict OS. Independent clinical risk factors were incorporated with radiomic features to build a combined model. Model performance was evaluated and compared using multiple statistical metrics.
Results: In the test cohort, the habitat model achieved strong performance for tumor response prediction (AUC: 0.881) and OS stratification (C-index: 0.703; 1-year AUC: 0.788; 2-year AUC: 0.806), outperforming the conventional radiomics model. Notably, the integrated model combining habitat features and clinical variables further improved predictive accuracy, yielding an AUC of 0.884 for response prediction and superior OS discrimination (C-index: 0.749; 1-year AUC: 0.831; 2-year AUC: 0.841).
Conclusion: The proposed CT-based habitat model enables a more accurate and interpretable assessment of treatment response and OS in HCC, offering valuable noninvasive biomarkers that reflect intra-tumor heterogeneity. This approach holds promise for improving individualized treatment planning and clinical outcomes.
Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.