Closing the temporal blind spot: Six additional electrodes increase patient-level EEG abnormality detection by ~12.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Carla Batista, Joana Isabel Soares, Paulo Coelho, Simão Ferreira, Ivana Rosenzweig, Daniel Filipe Borges
{"title":"Closing the temporal blind spot: Six additional electrodes increase patient-level EEG abnormality detection by ~12.","authors":"Carla Batista, Joana Isabel Soares, Paulo Coelho, Simão Ferreira, Ivana Rosenzweig, Daniel Filipe Borges","doi":"10.1002/epd2.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the additional detection yield of the 25-channel electrode array recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which includes six inferior-temporal electrodes beyond the conventional 10-20 International System (IS) in identifying interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and focal slow activity (SA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 258 consecutive adult EEGs (routine or sleep-deprived; mean age, 57 ± 19 years; 55% female; 61% on anti-seizure medication). Indications were suspected epilepsy (33%) and seizure follow-up (28%). Two blinded neurophysiologists harmonized IED/SA terminology and applied the validated three-item subset of the IFCN's operational IED criteria. Each EEG was reviewed twice: first with the standard 19-electrode 10-20 system and, after a ≥ 4-week washout, with the 25-channel IFCN array. Reading lists were randomized between reviewers so that the sequence of cases differed, thereby reducing recall bias. Abnormalities were classified by type and lobe. Agreement was measured using Cohen's κ; yield gain was the detection-rate difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect (κ = .65-.88; 95% CI: .48-1.00), with disagreement rates of 1.2-7.8%. Temporal IEDs were detected more frequently with IFCN (72/71 patients) than with 10-20 (63 each), corresponding to gains of 12.5% and 11.3%, respectively. Temporal SA was also higher (98 vs. 86; +12.2% for both). Gains in extratemporal SA were smaller (10.7% and 9.5%) and differences in extratemporal IEDs were minimal (≤3.6%). Pooled across all abnormalities, IFCN detected 183 and 182 patients versus 172 and 170 with 10-20, respectively, an overall gain of 11.5%. The largest relative increase was seen in temporal IEDs, with an additional 11-12% of patients identified using the IFCN array compared with 10-20.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The addition of six inferior-temporal electrodes increased the relative detection yield of EEG abnormalities by 11.5%, with the largest gains for temporal IEDs, and required only minimal extra setup time. Although the true diagnostic accuracy of these additional detections cannot be determined without an external gold standard, the findings support the routine use of the IFCN 25-electrode array to address a major blind spot of the 10-20 system in adult EEG practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.70114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the additional detection yield of the 25-channel electrode array recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which includes six inferior-temporal electrodes beyond the conventional 10-20 International System (IS) in identifying interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and focal slow activity (SA).

Methods: We analyzed 258 consecutive adult EEGs (routine or sleep-deprived; mean age, 57 ± 19 years; 55% female; 61% on anti-seizure medication). Indications were suspected epilepsy (33%) and seizure follow-up (28%). Two blinded neurophysiologists harmonized IED/SA terminology and applied the validated three-item subset of the IFCN's operational IED criteria. Each EEG was reviewed twice: first with the standard 19-electrode 10-20 system and, after a ≥ 4-week washout, with the 25-channel IFCN array. Reading lists were randomized between reviewers so that the sequence of cases differed, thereby reducing recall bias. Abnormalities were classified by type and lobe. Agreement was measured using Cohen's κ; yield gain was the detection-rate difference.

Results: Agreement ranged from substantial to almost perfect (κ = .65-.88; 95% CI: .48-1.00), with disagreement rates of 1.2-7.8%. Temporal IEDs were detected more frequently with IFCN (72/71 patients) than with 10-20 (63 each), corresponding to gains of 12.5% and 11.3%, respectively. Temporal SA was also higher (98 vs. 86; +12.2% for both). Gains in extratemporal SA were smaller (10.7% and 9.5%) and differences in extratemporal IEDs were minimal (≤3.6%). Pooled across all abnormalities, IFCN detected 183 and 182 patients versus 172 and 170 with 10-20, respectively, an overall gain of 11.5%. The largest relative increase was seen in temporal IEDs, with an additional 11-12% of patients identified using the IFCN array compared with 10-20.

Significance: The addition of six inferior-temporal electrodes increased the relative detection yield of EEG abnormalities by 11.5%, with the largest gains for temporal IEDs, and required only minimal extra setup time. Although the true diagnostic accuracy of these additional detections cannot be determined without an external gold standard, the findings support the routine use of the IFCN 25-electrode array to address a major blind spot of the 10-20 system in adult EEG practice.

关闭颞盲点:6个额外的电极使患者水平的脑电图异常检测增加了~12。
目的:量化国际临床神经生理学联合会(IFCN)推荐的25通道电极阵列的额外检测产量,该阵列包括6个颞下电极,而不是传统的10-20国际系统(IS),用于识别癫痫样间期放电(ied)和局灶慢活动(SA)。方法:我们分析了258例连续的成人脑电图(常规或睡眠剥夺,平均年龄57±19岁,55%为女性,61%服用抗癫痫药物)。适应症为疑似癫痫(33%)和癫痫随访(28%)。两名盲法神经生理学家统一了IED/SA术语,并应用了IFCN操作IED标准中经过验证的三项子集。每个脑电图检查两次:第一次使用标准的19电极10-20系统,在≥4周的冲洗后,使用25通道IFCN阵列。阅读清单在审稿人之间随机化,使案例顺序不同,从而减少回忆偏差。异常按类型和肺叶分类。采用Cohen’s κ来衡量一致性;产率增益为检出率差。结果:一致性范围从基本到几乎完美(κ = 0.65 - 0.88; 95% CI: 0.48 -1.00),不一致率为1.2-7.8%。IFCN组(72/71例)比10-20组(各63例)更频繁地检测到时间性ied,分别增加12.5%和11.3%。颞叶SA也较高(98比86;两者均+12.2%)。颞外SA的增加较小(10.7%和9.5%),颞外ied的差异很小(≤3.6%)。在所有异常中,IFCN检测到183例和182例,而172例和170例分别为10-20,总体增加11.5%。最大的相对增加是在时间ied中,使用IFCN阵列识别的患者增加了11-12%,而使用IFCN阵列识别的患者增加了10- 20%。意义:增加6个颞下电极可使EEG异常的相对检出率提高11.5%,其中颞下电极的检出率提高最大,且只需要最少的额外设置时间。尽管在没有外部金标准的情况下无法确定这些额外检测的真正诊断准确性,但研究结果支持常规使用IFCN 25电极阵列来解决成人脑电图实践中10-20系统的主要盲点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信