Pragmatic integration of user-centered design and implementation science: A new methodological approach for clinical decision support implementation in EHRs.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Anna Maw, Jason Hoppe, Nicole Wagner, James Mitchell, Meagan Bean, Katy E Trinkley
{"title":"Pragmatic integration of user-centered design and implementation science: A new methodological approach for clinical decision support implementation in EHRs.","authors":"Anna Maw, Jason Hoppe, Nicole Wagner, James Mitchell, Meagan Bean, Katy E Trinkley","doi":"10.1055/a-2716-4479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Clinical decision support (CDS) tools are critical for improving care delivery and guideline adherence but are associated with clinician burnout when inadequately designed and implemented. User Centered Design (UCD) and Implementation Science (IS) methods are evidence-based approaches to optimizing CDS tools, but are infrequently used in part due to limited guidance on how to apply them within the resource-constraints of health systems. Objective This paper focuses on pragmatic application of an integrated UCD-IS approach, demonstrating how it can be adapted to meet operational constraints through two real world case studies. Methods We applied an integrated UCD-IS approach guided by the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to two CDS projects within a large regional health system: (1) adapting a CDS for improving prescribing of goal-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure during virtual visits, and (2) expanding a naloxone co-prescribing CDS across outpatient settings. Each project followed iterative phases-partner engagement, design, prototyping, deployment, and evaluation tailored to time and resource constraints of the health system. Methods used included interviews, focus groups, surveys, and usability testing. Results Multilevel partner engagement surfaced critical insights that informed design adaptations. The heart failure CDS was adapted using minimal changes while the naloxone CDS underwent more extensive design iterations. Both projects balanced rigor and pragmatism, enabling timely implementation and rigorous design evaluation while supporting feasibility and sustainability. Iterative evaluations of both CDS are ongoing and structured to inform real-time refinements that support patient, clinician, and system level outcomes. Conclusions This work provides practical guidance on applying an integrated UCD-IS approach to CDS design and evaluation in time and resource-constrained health system environments. By flexibly applying this integrated approach, health systems can better address multilevel partner needs, ensure contextual relevance, and support sustained adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2716-4479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Clinical decision support (CDS) tools are critical for improving care delivery and guideline adherence but are associated with clinician burnout when inadequately designed and implemented. User Centered Design (UCD) and Implementation Science (IS) methods are evidence-based approaches to optimizing CDS tools, but are infrequently used in part due to limited guidance on how to apply them within the resource-constraints of health systems. Objective This paper focuses on pragmatic application of an integrated UCD-IS approach, demonstrating how it can be adapted to meet operational constraints through two real world case studies. Methods We applied an integrated UCD-IS approach guided by the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to two CDS projects within a large regional health system: (1) adapting a CDS for improving prescribing of goal-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure during virtual visits, and (2) expanding a naloxone co-prescribing CDS across outpatient settings. Each project followed iterative phases-partner engagement, design, prototyping, deployment, and evaluation tailored to time and resource constraints of the health system. Methods used included interviews, focus groups, surveys, and usability testing. Results Multilevel partner engagement surfaced critical insights that informed design adaptations. The heart failure CDS was adapted using minimal changes while the naloxone CDS underwent more extensive design iterations. Both projects balanced rigor and pragmatism, enabling timely implementation and rigorous design evaluation while supporting feasibility and sustainability. Iterative evaluations of both CDS are ongoing and structured to inform real-time refinements that support patient, clinician, and system level outcomes. Conclusions This work provides practical guidance on applying an integrated UCD-IS approach to CDS design and evaluation in time and resource-constrained health system environments. By flexibly applying this integrated approach, health systems can better address multilevel partner needs, ensure contextual relevance, and support sustained adoption.

以用户为中心的设计与实施科学的实用整合:电子病历中临床决策支持实施的新方法。
临床决策支持(CDS)工具对于改善护理服务和指南依从性至关重要,但如果设计和实施不当,则与临床医生的职业倦怠有关。以用户为中心的设计(UCD)和实施科学(IS)方法是优化CDS工具的循证方法,但很少使用,部分原因是关于如何在卫生系统资源有限的情况下应用它们的指导有限。本文着重于综合UCD-IS方法的实际应用,通过两个真实世界的案例研究,展示了如何适应操作限制。方法:我们将综合UCD-IS方法应用于一个大型区域卫生系统中的两个CDS项目:(1)调整CDS以改善虚拟就诊期间心力衰竭患者目标导向医疗治疗的处方;(2)在门诊环境中扩大纳洛酮联合处方CDS。每个项目都遵循迭代阶段——合作伙伴参与、设计、原型设计、部署和评估,以适应卫生系统的时间和资源限制。使用的方法包括访谈、焦点小组、调查和可用性测试。结果:多层次合作伙伴的参与产生了重要的见解,为设计调整提供了信息。心力衰竭CDS采用了最小的改变,而纳洛酮CDS则进行了更广泛的设计迭代。这两个项目都平衡了严谨和实用主义,在支持可行性和可持续性的同时,能够及时实施和严格的设计评估。这两种CDS的迭代评估都在进行中,并结构化,以告知实时改进,以支持患者、临床医生和系统级别的结果。结论本研究为在时间和资源有限的卫生系统环境中应用综合UCD-IS方法进行CDS设计和评估提供了实践指导。通过灵活应用这种综合方法,卫生系统可以更好地满足多层次合作伙伴的需求,确保上下文相关性,并支持持续采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信