Emergency nurses' experiences of caring for critically ill patients requiring intensive care in the emergency department.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Duygu Akbaş Uysal, Ebru Ekiz
{"title":"Emergency nurses' experiences of caring for critically ill patients requiring intensive care in the emergency department.","authors":"Duygu Akbaş Uysal, Ebru Ekiz","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments' red zones are complex clinical environments requiring both emergency interventions and intensive care-level services, representing a critical area of focus in this special issue on emergency critical care. Nurses working in these settings face multifaceted challenges, including role ambiguity, time constraints, and limited resources. However, few studies have explored these experiences through theoretical models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to provide an in-depth exploration of nurses' experiences delivering intensive care-level care to critically ill patients in the red zones of emergency departments, within a theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 emergency nurses from various regions in Turkey. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis, and findings were conceptually interpreted through Meleis's Transition Theory and Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four main themes and eleven subthemes emerged, including challenges in clinical judgment, role incompatibilities, and systemic shortages. Guided by Meleis's framework, findings indicate that adherence to intensive care standards and clinical education enhances competence, confidence, and reflective practice, informing nursing practice and policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses in emergency department red zones face multifaceted challenges, including the demands of multitasking, complexities in decision-making, and structural limitations in providing care for critically ill patients. The study emphasizes that clinical judgment is shaped not only by individual competencies but also by the availability of systemic support. These results underscore the necessity of establishing clear clinical guidelines, implementing structured team-based care models, and developing practice-oriented training programs to facilitate nurses' transition between emergency and intensive care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"83 ","pages":"101697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency departments' red zones are complex clinical environments requiring both emergency interventions and intensive care-level services, representing a critical area of focus in this special issue on emergency critical care. Nurses working in these settings face multifaceted challenges, including role ambiguity, time constraints, and limited resources. However, few studies have explored these experiences through theoretical models.

Objective: This study aims to provide an in-depth exploration of nurses' experiences delivering intensive care-level care to critically ill patients in the red zones of emergency departments, within a theoretical framework.

Method: Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 emergency nurses from various regions in Turkey. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis, and findings were conceptually interpreted through Meleis's Transition Theory and Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model.

Findings: Four main themes and eleven subthemes emerged, including challenges in clinical judgment, role incompatibilities, and systemic shortages. Guided by Meleis's framework, findings indicate that adherence to intensive care standards and clinical education enhances competence, confidence, and reflective practice, informing nursing practice and policy.

Conclusion: Nurses in emergency department red zones face multifaceted challenges, including the demands of multitasking, complexities in decision-making, and structural limitations in providing care for critically ill patients. The study emphasizes that clinical judgment is shaped not only by individual competencies but also by the availability of systemic support. These results underscore the necessity of establishing clear clinical guidelines, implementing structured team-based care models, and developing practice-oriented training programs to facilitate nurses' transition between emergency and intensive care settings.

急诊护士在急诊科护理需要重症监护的危重病人的经验。
背景:急诊科的红色区域是复杂的临床环境,需要紧急干预和重症监护级别的服务,是本期关于紧急重症监护的特刊关注的关键领域。在这些环境中工作的护士面临多方面的挑战,包括角色模糊、时间限制和资源有限。然而,很少有研究通过理论模型来探讨这些经验。目的:在理论框架下,深入探讨急诊科红色区域护士对危重病人进行重症监护的经验。方法:采用现象学定性方法,对来自土耳其不同地区的21名急诊护士进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用Braun和Clarke的六步主题分析,研究结果通过Meleis的过渡理论和Tanner的临床判断模型进行概念解释。结果:出现了四个主要主题和十一个次要主题,包括临床判断的挑战,角色不相容和系统短缺。在Meleis框架的指导下,研究结果表明,坚持重症监护标准和临床教育可以提高能力,信心和反思实践,为护理实践和政策提供信息。结论:急诊科红色区域的护士面临多重挑战,包括多任务处理的需求、决策的复杂性以及提供危重病人护理的结构性限制。该研究强调,临床判断不仅受到个人能力的影响,还受到系统支持的影响。这些结果强调了建立明确的临床指南、实施结构化的团队护理模式和制定以实践为导向的培训计划的必要性,以促进护士在急诊和重症监护环境之间的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信