[Implementing the right to withdraw consent to the processing of health data in research projects].

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Christoph Gerst, Florian Gottschalk, Eva Hummers, Falk Schlegelmilch
{"title":"[Implementing the right to withdraw consent to the processing of health data in research projects].","authors":"Christoph Gerst, Florian Gottschalk, Eva Hummers, Falk Schlegelmilch","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Processing data in health services research requires informed patient consent. When this consent is withdrawn, researchers face the challenge of correctly implementing legal requirements regarding data protection. This article aims to identify and analyze the tasks research institutions must undertake when processing a withdrawal of consent for data processing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a withdrawal case from the RADARplus research project, we conducted a legal analysis of requirements under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other relevant legal frameworks. Based on this analysis, we discuss implementation approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis reveals the complexity of implementing a withdrawal of consent procedure: Data may exist in various systems (research databases, backup systems, paper records) and must be identified accordingly. Different retention requirements apply depending on the type of data and legal basis. We outline responsibilities and practical approaches to restricting data processing, such as technical access limitations and blocking notices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The practical implementation of the right to withdraw consent presents complex challenges for research institutions. Open questions remain, particularly regarding pseudonymized data, long-term data storage, and collaboration with multiple research partners. While the suggested guidance provides a structured approach for legally compliant processing of withdrawals, it does not eliminate the need for data protection assessment and proper documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2025.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Processing data in health services research requires informed patient consent. When this consent is withdrawn, researchers face the challenge of correctly implementing legal requirements regarding data protection. This article aims to identify and analyze the tasks research institutions must undertake when processing a withdrawal of consent for data processing.

Methods: Using a withdrawal case from the RADARplus research project, we conducted a legal analysis of requirements under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other relevant legal frameworks. Based on this analysis, we discuss implementation approaches.

Results: The analysis reveals the complexity of implementing a withdrawal of consent procedure: Data may exist in various systems (research databases, backup systems, paper records) and must be identified accordingly. Different retention requirements apply depending on the type of data and legal basis. We outline responsibilities and practical approaches to restricting data processing, such as technical access limitations and blocking notices.

Discussion: The practical implementation of the right to withdraw consent presents complex challenges for research institutions. Open questions remain, particularly regarding pseudonymized data, long-term data storage, and collaboration with multiple research partners. While the suggested guidance provides a structured approach for legally compliant processing of withdrawals, it does not eliminate the need for data protection assessment and proper documentation.

[落实撤回对研究项目中健康数据处理的同意的权利]。
背景:在卫生服务研究中处理数据需要患者知情同意。当这种同意被撤回时,研究人员面临着正确实施有关数据保护的法律要求的挑战。本文旨在识别和分析研究机构在处理撤销数据处理同意时必须承担的任务。方法:利用RADARplus研究项目的撤回案例,我们对《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)和其他相关法律框架下的要求进行了法律分析。在此基础上,讨论了实现方法。结果:分析揭示了实施撤回同意程序的复杂性:数据可能存在于各种系统(研究数据库、备份系统、纸质记录)中,必须相应地识别。根据数据类型和法律依据,适用不同的保留要求。我们概述了限制数据处理的责任和实际方法,例如技术访问限制和阻止通知。讨论:撤回同意权的实际实施对研究机构提出了复杂的挑战。悬而未决的问题仍然存在,特别是关于假名数据、长期数据存储以及与多个研究伙伴的合作。虽然建议的指导方针为符合法律要求的提款处理提供了结构化的方法,但它并没有消除对数据保护评估和适当文件的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信