Antiseptic Soaking of Tendon Xenografts: A Biomechanical Study on Structural Integrity as a Model for ACL Autografts.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Fatih Günaydın, Hasan Ceylan, Mahmud Aydin, Osman Görkem Muratoğlu, Ada Özcecelik, Cem Yıldırım, Ergün Bozdağ
{"title":"Antiseptic Soaking of Tendon Xenografts: A Biomechanical Study on Structural Integrity as a Model for ACL Autografts.","authors":"Fatih Günaydın, Hasan Ceylan, Mahmud Aydin, Osman Görkem Muratoğlu, Ada Özcecelik, Cem Yıldırım, Ergün Bozdağ","doi":"10.1055/a-2716-4573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, intraoperative graft contamination or postoperative infection remains a notable clinical concern. While antiseptic solutions are increasingly employed for graft decontamination and infection prophylaxis, the potential impact of these agents on the biomechanical integrity of tendon grafts has not been fully elucidated. This experimental study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of soaking tendon grafts in vancomycin, chlorhexidine, and povidone-iodine solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fresh bovine deep digital flexor tendons were used to simulate ACL autografts and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 6): 4% chlorhexidine, 10% povidone-iodine, 5 mg/mL vancomycin, and 0.9% isotonic saline (control). After 30-minute soaking, tendons were sutured using a Four Rip-Stop technique and biomechanically tested using a servohydraulic tensile system. Failure load, stiffness, and cyclic elongation were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vancomycin and chlorhexidine groups exhibited significantly lower cyclic elongation compared to control and povidone-iodine groups. Failure load was also significantly higher in these groups, particularly compared to povidone-iodine, which demonstrated the weakest biomechanical performance. No significant differences in stiffness were observed across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vancomycin and chlorhexidine can be safely used for short-term antiseptic soaking without compromising graft mechanical integrity. In contrast, povidone-iodine may weaken tendon structure. These findings may guide antiseptic use during ACL reconstruction and in managing contaminated tendons in open injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2716-4573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, intraoperative graft contamination or postoperative infection remains a notable clinical concern. While antiseptic solutions are increasingly employed for graft decontamination and infection prophylaxis, the potential impact of these agents on the biomechanical integrity of tendon grafts has not been fully elucidated. This experimental study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of soaking tendon grafts in vancomycin, chlorhexidine, and povidone-iodine solutions.

Methods: Fresh bovine deep digital flexor tendons were used to simulate ACL autografts and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 6): 4% chlorhexidine, 10% povidone-iodine, 5 mg/mL vancomycin, and 0.9% isotonic saline (control). After 30-minute soaking, tendons were sutured using a Four Rip-Stop technique and biomechanically tested using a servohydraulic tensile system. Failure load, stiffness, and cyclic elongation were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction.

Results: Vancomycin and chlorhexidine groups exhibited significantly lower cyclic elongation compared to control and povidone-iodine groups. Failure load was also significantly higher in these groups, particularly compared to povidone-iodine, which demonstrated the weakest biomechanical performance. No significant differences in stiffness were observed across groups.

Conclusion: Vancomycin and chlorhexidine can be safely used for short-term antiseptic soaking without compromising graft mechanical integrity. In contrast, povidone-iodine may weaken tendon structure. These findings may guide antiseptic use during ACL reconstruction and in managing contaminated tendons in open injuries.

异种肌腱防腐浸泡:作为自体ACL移植模型的结构完整性生物力学研究。
前言:在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中,术中移植物污染或术后感染仍然是一个值得注意的临床问题。虽然抗菌溶液越来越多地用于移植物净化和感染预防,但这些药物对肌腱移植物生物力学完整性的潜在影响尚未得到充分阐明。本实验旨在评估万古霉素、氯己定和聚维酮碘溶液浸泡肌腱移植物的生物力学效果。方法:采用新鲜牛指深屈肌腱模拟自体ACL移植,随机分为4组(n = 6): 4%氯己定、10%聚维酮碘、5 mg/mL万古霉素、0.9%等渗盐水(对照组)。浸泡30分钟后,使用Four Rip-Stop技术缝合肌腱,并使用伺服液压拉伸系统进行生物力学测试。破坏载荷,刚度和循环伸长率进行了测量。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析,并进行Bonferroni校正。结果:万古霉素组和氯己定组与对照组和聚维酮碘组相比,环伸长明显降低。这些组的失效负荷也明显更高,特别是与聚维酮碘相比,聚维酮碘表现出最弱的生物力学性能。各组间硬度无显著差异。结论:万古霉素和氯己定可安全用于短期防腐浸泡,且不影响移植物的机械完整性。相反,聚维酮碘可能会削弱肌腱结构。这些发现可以指导前交叉韧带重建和处理开放性损伤中污染肌腱时使用防腐剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信