AI and neurotechnology: Ethical challenges, human rights, and quality of healthcare.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101169

I de Lecuona, R F Estévez

引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI-powered neurotechnologies pose significant challenges due to the sensitive nature of the personal data they process and their potential impact on human behaviour and health. This work adopts an ethical framework that, drawing on scientific evidence, advocates for the promotion and protection of individual rights in the deployment of AI. First, it explores the exponential adoption and diversification of AI systems in healthcare delivery. Second, it explores translational neuroethics to demonstrate its value in enhancing the quality of care. Ultimately, ensuring high-quality healthcare requires rethinking the human-technology relationship.

查看原文本刊更多论文

人工智能驱动的神经技术由于其处理的个人数据的敏感性及其对人类行为和健康的潜在影响，构成了重大挑战。这项工作采用了一个伦理框架，根据科学证据，倡导在部署人工智能时促进和保护个人权利。首先，它探讨了人工智能系统在医疗保健服务中的指数级采用和多样化。其次，探讨转化神经伦理学，以证明其在提高护理质量方面的价值。最终，确保高质量的医疗保健需要重新思考人与技术的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Medicine-Health Policy

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)