Diaphragm Thickness and Excursion in Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Brittany Braun, Eleni Petrou, Jennifer Ostrowski
{"title":"Diaphragm Thickness and Excursion in Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic.","authors":"Brittany Braun, Eleni Petrou, Jennifer Ostrowski","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition, with nonspecific low back pain (NS-LBP) accounting for the majority of cases. NS-LBP lacks a definitive pathological cause, complicating diagnosis and management. Emerging research has identified diaphragm dysfunction, including alterations in thickness and excursion, as a potential factor contributing to NS-LBP. Ultrasound is a noninvasive tool used to measure these diaphragm characteristics and explore their association with NS-LBP.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>In patients with NS-LBP, is there a difference in diaphragm thickness and excursion (as measured by ultrasound) compared with healthy controls?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>A systematic search yielded 4 high-quality case-control studies assessing diaphragm function in patients with NS-LBP. All 4 studies demonstrated significantly reduced diaphragm thickness in patients with NS-LBP compared with healthy controls. Findings on diaphragm excursion were inconsistent, with 1 study reporting significant differences while 3 showed no differences between groups. Reduced diaphragm thickness and slower changes in thickness were consistently associated with impaired spinal stabilization.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>The evidence indicates a consistent difference in diaphragm thickness between individuals with NS-LBP and healthy controls, suggesting a potential role of diaphragm dysfunction in the pathophysiology of NS-LBP. However, inconsistent findings on diaphragm excursion warrant further investigation.</p><p><strong>Strength of recommendation: </strong>Based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, the clinical bottom line is based on grade A evidence for diaphragm thickness while diaphragm excursion is grade B.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical scenario: Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition, with nonspecific low back pain (NS-LBP) accounting for the majority of cases. NS-LBP lacks a definitive pathological cause, complicating diagnosis and management. Emerging research has identified diaphragm dysfunction, including alterations in thickness and excursion, as a potential factor contributing to NS-LBP. Ultrasound is a noninvasive tool used to measure these diaphragm characteristics and explore their association with NS-LBP.

Clinical question: In patients with NS-LBP, is there a difference in diaphragm thickness and excursion (as measured by ultrasound) compared with healthy controls?

Summary of key findings: A systematic search yielded 4 high-quality case-control studies assessing diaphragm function in patients with NS-LBP. All 4 studies demonstrated significantly reduced diaphragm thickness in patients with NS-LBP compared with healthy controls. Findings on diaphragm excursion were inconsistent, with 1 study reporting significant differences while 3 showed no differences between groups. Reduced diaphragm thickness and slower changes in thickness were consistently associated with impaired spinal stabilization.

Clinical bottom line: The evidence indicates a consistent difference in diaphragm thickness between individuals with NS-LBP and healthy controls, suggesting a potential role of diaphragm dysfunction in the pathophysiology of NS-LBP. However, inconsistent findings on diaphragm excursion warrant further investigation.

Strength of recommendation: Based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, the clinical bottom line is based on grade A evidence for diaphragm thickness while diaphragm excursion is grade B.

非特异性腰痛的膈膜厚度和偏移:一个批判性评价的话题。
临床情况:腰痛是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,非特异性腰痛(NS-LBP)占大多数病例。NS-LBP缺乏明确的病理原因,使诊断和治疗复杂化。新兴研究已经确定膈肌功能障碍,包括厚度和偏移的改变,是导致NS-LBP的潜在因素。超声是一种非侵入性工具,用于测量这些隔膜特征并探讨其与NS-LBP的关系。临床问题:NS-LBP患者与健康对照者相比,膈膜厚度和偏移(超声测量)有差异吗?主要发现总结:系统检索得出4项高质量的病例对照研究,评估NS-LBP患者的膈肌功能。所有4项研究都表明,与健康对照相比,NS-LBP患者的膈膜厚度显著降低。横膈膜偏移的研究结果不一致,1项研究报告有显著差异,3项研究报告组间无差异。膈膜厚度减少和厚度变化缓慢始终与脊柱稳定性受损有关。临床结论:有证据表明,NS-LBP患者和健康对照者的横膈膜厚度存在一致的差异,这表明横膈膜功能障碍在NS-LBP的病理生理中可能起作用。然而,关于横膈膜偏移的不一致的发现值得进一步的研究。推荐强度:根据推荐强度分类法,临床底线是基于隔膜厚度的A级证据,而隔膜偏移是B级证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信