{"title":"Diaphragm Thickness and Excursion in Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic.","authors":"Brittany Braun, Eleni Petrou, Jennifer Ostrowski","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition, with nonspecific low back pain (NS-LBP) accounting for the majority of cases. NS-LBP lacks a definitive pathological cause, complicating diagnosis and management. Emerging research has identified diaphragm dysfunction, including alterations in thickness and excursion, as a potential factor contributing to NS-LBP. Ultrasound is a noninvasive tool used to measure these diaphragm characteristics and explore their association with NS-LBP.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>In patients with NS-LBP, is there a difference in diaphragm thickness and excursion (as measured by ultrasound) compared with healthy controls?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>A systematic search yielded 4 high-quality case-control studies assessing diaphragm function in patients with NS-LBP. All 4 studies demonstrated significantly reduced diaphragm thickness in patients with NS-LBP compared with healthy controls. Findings on diaphragm excursion were inconsistent, with 1 study reporting significant differences while 3 showed no differences between groups. Reduced diaphragm thickness and slower changes in thickness were consistently associated with impaired spinal stabilization.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>The evidence indicates a consistent difference in diaphragm thickness between individuals with NS-LBP and healthy controls, suggesting a potential role of diaphragm dysfunction in the pathophysiology of NS-LBP. However, inconsistent findings on diaphragm excursion warrant further investigation.</p><p><strong>Strength of recommendation: </strong>Based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, the clinical bottom line is based on grade A evidence for diaphragm thickness while diaphragm excursion is grade B.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical scenario: Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition, with nonspecific low back pain (NS-LBP) accounting for the majority of cases. NS-LBP lacks a definitive pathological cause, complicating diagnosis and management. Emerging research has identified diaphragm dysfunction, including alterations in thickness and excursion, as a potential factor contributing to NS-LBP. Ultrasound is a noninvasive tool used to measure these diaphragm characteristics and explore their association with NS-LBP.
Clinical question: In patients with NS-LBP, is there a difference in diaphragm thickness and excursion (as measured by ultrasound) compared with healthy controls?
Summary of key findings: A systematic search yielded 4 high-quality case-control studies assessing diaphragm function in patients with NS-LBP. All 4 studies demonstrated significantly reduced diaphragm thickness in patients with NS-LBP compared with healthy controls. Findings on diaphragm excursion were inconsistent, with 1 study reporting significant differences while 3 showed no differences between groups. Reduced diaphragm thickness and slower changes in thickness were consistently associated with impaired spinal stabilization.
Clinical bottom line: The evidence indicates a consistent difference in diaphragm thickness between individuals with NS-LBP and healthy controls, suggesting a potential role of diaphragm dysfunction in the pathophysiology of NS-LBP. However, inconsistent findings on diaphragm excursion warrant further investigation.
Strength of recommendation: Based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, the clinical bottom line is based on grade A evidence for diaphragm thickness while diaphragm excursion is grade B.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.