Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Mohd Syahir Mansoor, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido, Salem Alshehri, Mamdouh Alqathami
{"title":"Quantification of dose accumulation using deformable image registration: Application in re-irradiation of liver metastases using robotic radiosurgery","authors":"Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Mohd Syahir Mansoor, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido, Salem Alshehri, Mamdouh Alqathami","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluates cumulative dose estimations using deformable image registration (DIR) in robotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)-based multiple re-irradiations for liver metastases. It highlights DIR's role and accuracy in adaptive radiotherapy to enhance treatment precision and reduce toxicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials & Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients (age: 42–80, median: 61 years) with liver metastases re-irradiated using CyberKnife SABR (54 treatments) between June 2016 and February 2024. A comparative analysis of organs-at-risk (OAR) volumes was performed using contours derived from DIR and physical summation method to evaluate consistency between the two approaches. Dosimetric analysis involved accumulating doses to organs at risk using physical dose summation and DIR-based dose summation. To standardize dose assessments, all radiation doses were converted into equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) and biologically effective doses (BED). The DIR algorithm was quantitatively assessed using similarity indices, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard (JD) index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The findings demonstrated that organs susceptible to motion, such as the liver and large bowel, exhibited greater variability in volume measurements when evaluated using physical summation. A significant reduction in maximum dose for the liver (<i>p</i> = 0.00) and chest wall (<i>p</i> = 0.05) was observed under DIR-based dose accumulation (liver-83.2 ± 28.0 Gy; chest wall-66.9 ± 18.6 Gy) compared to physical summation (liver-123.8 ± 55.6 Gy; chest wall-82.9 ± 22.4 Gy), suggesting overestimation using physical summation. Among the analyzed structures, DIR showed high spatial accuracy for the heart, liver, and external body with Dice scores > 0.90 and Jaccard indices > 0.84, while lower agreement was noted for deformable organs such as the bowel with Dice scores < 0.43 and Jaccard indices < 0.29.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DIR improved anatomical alignment and provides more anatomically consistent cumulative dose estimation in SABR re-irradiation, particularly for OARs that are prone to deform. Integrating DIR into adaptive radiotherapy workflows can improve the estimation of dose to OARs while minimizing toxicity risks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This study evaluates cumulative dose estimations using deformable image registration (DIR) in robotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)-based multiple re-irradiations for liver metastases. It highlights DIR's role and accuracy in adaptive radiotherapy to enhance treatment precision and reduce toxicity.
Materials & Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients (age: 42–80, median: 61 years) with liver metastases re-irradiated using CyberKnife SABR (54 treatments) between June 2016 and February 2024. A comparative analysis of organs-at-risk (OAR) volumes was performed using contours derived from DIR and physical summation method to evaluate consistency between the two approaches. Dosimetric analysis involved accumulating doses to organs at risk using physical dose summation and DIR-based dose summation. To standardize dose assessments, all radiation doses were converted into equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) and biologically effective doses (BED). The DIR algorithm was quantitatively assessed using similarity indices, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard (JD) index.
Results
The findings demonstrated that organs susceptible to motion, such as the liver and large bowel, exhibited greater variability in volume measurements when evaluated using physical summation. A significant reduction in maximum dose for the liver (p = 0.00) and chest wall (p = 0.05) was observed under DIR-based dose accumulation (liver-83.2 ± 28.0 Gy; chest wall-66.9 ± 18.6 Gy) compared to physical summation (liver-123.8 ± 55.6 Gy; chest wall-82.9 ± 22.4 Gy), suggesting overestimation using physical summation. Among the analyzed structures, DIR showed high spatial accuracy for the heart, liver, and external body with Dice scores > 0.90 and Jaccard indices > 0.84, while lower agreement was noted for deformable organs such as the bowel with Dice scores < 0.43 and Jaccard indices < 0.29.
Conclusions
DIR improved anatomical alignment and provides more anatomically consistent cumulative dose estimation in SABR re-irradiation, particularly for OARs that are prone to deform. Integrating DIR into adaptive radiotherapy workflows can improve the estimation of dose to OARs while minimizing toxicity risks.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic