Quantification of dose accumulation using deformable image registration: Application in re-irradiation of liver metastases using robotic radiosurgery

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf, Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz, Mohd Syahir Mansoor, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido, Salem Alshehri, Mamdouh Alqathami
{"title":"Quantification of dose accumulation using deformable image registration: Application in re-irradiation of liver metastases using robotic radiosurgery","authors":"Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf,&nbsp;Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz,&nbsp;Mohd Syahir Mansoor,&nbsp;Gokula Kumar Appalanaido,&nbsp;Salem Alshehri,&nbsp;Mamdouh Alqathami","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluates cumulative dose estimations using deformable image registration (DIR) in robotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)-based multiple re-irradiations for liver metastases. It highlights DIR's role and accuracy in adaptive radiotherapy to enhance treatment precision and reduce toxicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients (age: 42–80, median: 61 years) with liver metastases re-irradiated using CyberKnife SABR (54 treatments) between June 2016 and February 2024. A comparative analysis of organs-at-risk (OAR) volumes was performed using contours derived from DIR and physical summation method to evaluate consistency between the two approaches. Dosimetric analysis involved accumulating doses to organs at risk using physical dose summation and DIR-based dose summation. To standardize dose assessments, all radiation doses were converted into equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) and biologically effective doses (BED). The DIR algorithm was quantitatively assessed using similarity indices, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard (JD) index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The findings demonstrated that organs susceptible to motion, such as the liver and large bowel, exhibited greater variability in volume measurements when evaluated using physical summation. A significant reduction in maximum dose for the liver (<i>p</i> = 0.00) and chest wall (<i>p</i> = 0.05) was observed under DIR-based dose accumulation (liver-83.2 ± 28.0 Gy; chest wall-66.9 ± 18.6 Gy) compared to physical summation (liver-123.8 ± 55.6 Gy; chest wall-82.9 ± 22.4 Gy), suggesting overestimation using physical summation. Among the analyzed structures, DIR showed high spatial accuracy for the heart, liver, and external body with Dice scores &gt; 0.90 and Jaccard indices &gt; 0.84, while lower agreement was noted for deformable organs such as the bowel with Dice scores &lt; 0.43 and Jaccard indices &lt; 0.29.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>DIR improved anatomical alignment and provides more anatomically consistent cumulative dose estimation in SABR re-irradiation, particularly for OARs that are prone to deform. Integrating DIR into adaptive radiotherapy workflows can improve the estimation of dose to OARs while minimizing toxicity risks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluates cumulative dose estimations using deformable image registration (DIR) in robotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)-based multiple re-irradiations for liver metastases. It highlights DIR's role and accuracy in adaptive radiotherapy to enhance treatment precision and reduce toxicity.

Materials & Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 patients (age: 42–80, median: 61 years) with liver metastases re-irradiated using CyberKnife SABR (54 treatments) between June 2016 and February 2024. A comparative analysis of organs-at-risk (OAR) volumes was performed using contours derived from DIR and physical summation method to evaluate consistency between the two approaches. Dosimetric analysis involved accumulating doses to organs at risk using physical dose summation and DIR-based dose summation. To standardize dose assessments, all radiation doses were converted into equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) and biologically effective doses (BED). The DIR algorithm was quantitatively assessed using similarity indices, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard (JD) index.

Results

The findings demonstrated that organs susceptible to motion, such as the liver and large bowel, exhibited greater variability in volume measurements when evaluated using physical summation. A significant reduction in maximum dose for the liver (p = 0.00) and chest wall (p = 0.05) was observed under DIR-based dose accumulation (liver-83.2 ± 28.0 Gy; chest wall-66.9 ± 18.6 Gy) compared to physical summation (liver-123.8 ± 55.6 Gy; chest wall-82.9 ± 22.4 Gy), suggesting overestimation using physical summation. Among the analyzed structures, DIR showed high spatial accuracy for the heart, liver, and external body with Dice scores > 0.90 and Jaccard indices > 0.84, while lower agreement was noted for deformable organs such as the bowel with Dice scores < 0.43 and Jaccard indices < 0.29.

Conclusions

DIR improved anatomical alignment and provides more anatomically consistent cumulative dose estimation in SABR re-irradiation, particularly for OARs that are prone to deform. Integrating DIR into adaptive radiotherapy workflows can improve the estimation of dose to OARs while minimizing toxicity risks.

Abstract Image

使用可变形图像配准的剂量累积量化:应用机器人放射外科在肝转移再照射中的应用。
目的:本研究利用可变形图像配准(DIR)评估基于机器人立体定向消融放疗(SABR)的肝转移多次再照射的累积剂量估计。它强调了DIR在适应性放疗中的作用和准确性,以提高治疗精度和降低毒性。材料与方法:回顾性分析2016年6月至2024年2月期间22例(42-80岁,中位:61岁)肝转移患者(54例)使用射波刀SABR再照射。对危险器官(OAR)体积进行比较分析,使用从DIR和物理求和法得出的轮廓来评估两种方法之间的一致性。剂量学分析涉及使用物理剂量总和和基于dir的剂量总和来累积对有危险器官的剂量。为了使剂量评估标准化,将所有辐射剂量转换为2 Gy当量剂量(EQD2)和生物有效剂量(BED)。采用骰子相似系数(Dice similarity coefficient, DSC)和Jaccard指数(Jaccard index, JD)等相似指数对DIR算法进行定量评价。结果:研究结果表明,易受运动影响的器官,如肝脏和大肠,在使用物理总和评估时,在体积测量中表现出更大的变异性。与物理累积(肝脏-123.8±55.6 Gy;胸壁-82.9±22.4 Gy)相比,基于ir的剂量累积(肝脏-83.2±28.0 Gy;胸壁-66.9±18.6 Gy)观察到肝脏(p = 0.00)和胸壁(p = 0.05)的最大剂量显著降低(肝脏-83.2±28.0 Gy;胸壁-66.9±18.6 Gy),提示物理累积过高估计。在分析的结构中,DIR对心脏、肝脏和体外的空间精度较高,Dice评分为> 0.90,Jaccard指数为> 0.84,而对肠等可变形器官的一致性较低,Dice评分为> 0.84。结论:DIR改善了SABR再照射的解剖一致性,并提供了更符合解剖结构的累积剂量估计,特别是对于容易变形的桨叶。将DIR纳入自适应放射治疗工作流程可以改善对OARs剂量的估计,同时将毒性风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信