Testing Theory-Enhanced Messaging to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Among Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Yanhan Shen, Sasha Fleary, McKaylee Robertson, Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Kate Penrose, Jenna Sanborn, Surabhi Yadav, Avantika Srivastava, Denis Nash, Angela Parcesepe
{"title":"Testing Theory-Enhanced Messaging to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Among Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Yanhan Shen, Sasha Fleary, McKaylee Robertson, Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Kate Penrose, Jenna Sanborn, Surabhi Yadav, Avantika Srivastava, Denis Nash, Angela Parcesepe","doi":"10.2196/79228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine has been low in the United States despite ongoing public health recommendations. This has been linked to many factors, including pandemic fatigue; reduced risk perception; dis- and misinformation; and, more recently, symptoms of depression and anxiety. Novel communication and messaging strategies are one potential approach to promote vaccine uptake.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to fill research gaps by testing the effect of 2 communication-based approaches<strong>-</strong>the use of a short attitudinal inoculation message and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) kernel messaging<strong>-</strong>compared to standard public health messaging on vaccine uptake in a cohort of adult US residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a 3-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blinded stratified randomized trial between April 15, 2024, and May 2, 2024. Individuals were eligible if they were aged ≥18 years and (1) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine but (2) had not received COVID-19 vaccine doses since September 11, 2023, and (3) had not been infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the previous 3 months. We purposively sampled eligible individuals with and without symptoms of anxiety and depression. Participants were randomly allocated to the (1) attitudinal inoculation intervention, (2) CBT kernel intervention, or (3) standard public health messaging intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the 4-week follow-up, COVID-19 vaccination uptake was low overall (17/1403, 1.2%, 95% CI 0.6%-1.8%) and did not significantly differ by study arm<strong>-</strong>1.5% (7/469) in the CBT kernel arm (95% CI 0.4%-2.8%), 0.9% (4/466) in the inoculation arm (95% CI 0%-1.8%), and 1.3% (6/468) in the standard arm (95% CI 0.3%-2.4%). Compared to the standard arm, the CBT kernel intervention yielded a risk difference (RD) of 0.3% (95% CI -1.3% to 1.8%) and a risk ratio (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI 0.41-3.59); the inoculation intervention yielded an RD of -0.4% (95% CI -1.8% to 1%) and an RR of 0.69 (95% CI 0.19-2.44). Reported SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccine uptake did not differ by anxiety or depression symptoms. At baseline, approximately one-third of participants (466/1403, 33.21%) reported high willingness to receive another COVID-19 vaccine dose, with no significant differences across arms. At the 4-week follow-up, willingness remained similar across groups (CBT kernel vs standard arm: RD=-0.3%, 95% CI -6.3% to 5.8%, and RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.25; inoculation vs standard arm: RD=7%, 95% CI 0.8%-13.3%, and RR=1.23, 95% CI 0.98-1.53). Willingness did not differ by mental health status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful efforts to increase uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine via theory-enhanced messaging remain elusive. Findings underscore the challenges of shifting behavior through messaging alone in a context of declining public trust and a diminished sense of urgency years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing research is needed to better understand and address informational and behavioral barriers to vaccination.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06119854; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06119854.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e79228"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/79228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine has been low in the United States despite ongoing public health recommendations. This has been linked to many factors, including pandemic fatigue; reduced risk perception; dis- and misinformation; and, more recently, symptoms of depression and anxiety. Novel communication and messaging strategies are one potential approach to promote vaccine uptake.

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to fill research gaps by testing the effect of 2 communication-based approaches-the use of a short attitudinal inoculation message and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) kernel messaging-compared to standard public health messaging on vaccine uptake in a cohort of adult US residents.

Methods: We completed a 3-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blinded stratified randomized trial between April 15, 2024, and May 2, 2024. Individuals were eligible if they were aged ≥18 years and (1) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine but (2) had not received COVID-19 vaccine doses since September 11, 2023, and (3) had not been infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the previous 3 months. We purposively sampled eligible individuals with and without symptoms of anxiety and depression. Participants were randomly allocated to the (1) attitudinal inoculation intervention, (2) CBT kernel intervention, or (3) standard public health messaging intervention.

Results: By the 4-week follow-up, COVID-19 vaccination uptake was low overall (17/1403, 1.2%, 95% CI 0.6%-1.8%) and did not significantly differ by study arm-1.5% (7/469) in the CBT kernel arm (95% CI 0.4%-2.8%), 0.9% (4/466) in the inoculation arm (95% CI 0%-1.8%), and 1.3% (6/468) in the standard arm (95% CI 0.3%-2.4%). Compared to the standard arm, the CBT kernel intervention yielded a risk difference (RD) of 0.3% (95% CI -1.3% to 1.8%) and a risk ratio (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI 0.41-3.59); the inoculation intervention yielded an RD of -0.4% (95% CI -1.8% to 1%) and an RR of 0.69 (95% CI 0.19-2.44). Reported SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccine uptake did not differ by anxiety or depression symptoms. At baseline, approximately one-third of participants (466/1403, 33.21%) reported high willingness to receive another COVID-19 vaccine dose, with no significant differences across arms. At the 4-week follow-up, willingness remained similar across groups (CBT kernel vs standard arm: RD=-0.3%, 95% CI -6.3% to 5.8%, and RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.25; inoculation vs standard arm: RD=7%, 95% CI 0.8%-13.3%, and RR=1.23, 95% CI 0.98-1.53). Willingness did not differ by mental health status.

Conclusions: Successful efforts to increase uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine via theory-enhanced messaging remain elusive. Findings underscore the challenges of shifting behavior through messaging alone in a context of declining public trust and a diminished sense of urgency years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ongoing research is needed to better understand and address informational and behavioral barriers to vaccination.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06119854; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06119854.

测试理论增强信息以促进成人COVID-19疫苗接种:随机对照试验
背景:尽管有持续的公共卫生建议,但美国的COVID-19疫苗接种率一直很低。这与许多因素有关,包括大流行疲劳;降低风险认知;虚假和错误信息;最近,出现了抑郁和焦虑的症状。新的沟通和信息传递策略是促进疫苗吸收的一种潜在方法。目的:本随机对照试验旨在填补研究空白,通过测试两种基于通信的方法-使用简短的态度接种信息和认知行为治疗(CBT)核心信息-与标准公共卫生信息相比,在美国成年居民队列中接种疫苗。方法:我们于2024年4月15日至2024年5月2日完成了一项3组、平行组、评估盲的分层随机试验。符合条件的个人年龄≥18岁,并且(1)至少接种过一剂COVID-19疫苗,但(2)自2023年9月11日以来未接种过COVID-19疫苗,以及(3)在过去3个月内未感染过SARS-CoV-2。我们有目的地对有或没有焦虑和抑郁症状的合格个体进行抽样。参与者被随机分配到(1)态度接种干预,(2)CBT核心干预,或(3)标准公共卫生信息干预。结果:通过4周的随访,COVID-19疫苗接种率总体较低(17/1403,1.2%,95% CI 0.6 -1.8%),研究组间无显著差异:CBT核心组为1.5% (7/469)(95% CI 0.4%-2.8%),接种组为0.9% (4/466)(95% CI 0%-1.8%),标准组为1.3% (95% CI 0.3%-2.4%)。与标准组相比,CBT核心干预的风险差异(RD)为0.3% (95% CI -1.3%至1.8%),风险比(RR)为1.21 (95% CI 0.41-3.59);接种干预的RD为-0.4% (95% CI为-1.8% ~ 1%),RR为0.69 (95% CI为0.19 ~ 2.44)。报告的SARS-CoV-2感染和疫苗接种没有因焦虑或抑郁症状而差异。在基线时,大约三分之一的参与者(466/1403,33.21%)报告了接受另一剂COVID-19疫苗的高意愿,各组间无显著差异。在4周的随访中,各组的意愿保持相似(CBT核心组与标准组:RD=-0.3%, 95% CI -6.3%至5.8%,RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.25;接种组与标准组:RD=7%, 95% CI 0.8%-13.3%, RR=1.23, 95% CI 0.98-1.53)。意愿没有因心理健康状况而异。结论:通过强化理论的信息传递提高COVID-19疫苗吸收率的成功努力仍然难以实现。调查结果强调,在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发多年后,公众信任度不断下降,紧迫感减弱,在这种背景下,仅通过信息传递来改变行为存在挑战。需要进行持续的研究,以更好地了解和解决疫苗接种的信息和行为障碍。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06119854;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06119854。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信