Investigating the association between incretin-based therapies and thyroid cancer incidence among US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clement O Acheampong, John B Buse, Klara R Klein, Lawrence T Kim, Joshua Evron, Anna R Kahkoska, Caroline A Thompson, Tiansheng Wang, Virginia Pate, Peter Leese, Til Stürmer
{"title":"Investigating the association between incretin-based therapies and thyroid cancer incidence among US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.","authors":"Clement O Acheampong, John B Buse, Klara R Klein, Lawrence T Kim, Joshua Evron, Anna R Kahkoska, Caroline A Thompson, Tiansheng Wang, Virginia Pate, Peter Leese, Til Stürmer","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preclinical studies suggest a potential link between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and thyroid cancer (TC), yet it is unclear if this risk translates to humans.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We estimated the comparative effect of incretin-based therapies (GLP-1RA and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i)) versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) on TC incidence among US older adults with type 2 diabetes. We defined TC as a thyroidectomy followed by ≥2 separate diagnoses codes for malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland within 90 days. We estimated adjusted 3-year cumulative risk differences of TC (aRDs) with 95% CIs using weighted Kaplan-Meier survival functions, and adjusted HRs using weighted Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 73 388 new users in the GLP-1RA versus SGLT-2i cohort (mean age 72.4 years, men: 48.3%) and 106 274 in the DPP-4i versus SGLT-2i cohort (mean age 74.6 years, men: 44.9%). At 3 years and a median duration of treatment of 0.82-1.15 years, the aRD for GLP-1RA versus SGLT-2i for TC was -23 per 10 000 (95% CI: -51 to 4) and the aRD for DPP-4i versus SGLT-2i was -2 per 10 000 (95% CI: -17 to 13). Secondary and sensitivity analyses were consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study of US Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes suggests that the initiation of incretin-based therapies may not increase the 3-year risk of TC compared with initiation of SGLT-2i. This finding offers reassurance for short-term use but does not eliminate the possibility of increased long-term or subtype-specific risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preclinical studies suggest a potential link between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and thyroid cancer (TC), yet it is unclear if this risk translates to humans.

Research design and methods: We estimated the comparative effect of incretin-based therapies (GLP-1RA and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i)) versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) on TC incidence among US older adults with type 2 diabetes. We defined TC as a thyroidectomy followed by ≥2 separate diagnoses codes for malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland within 90 days. We estimated adjusted 3-year cumulative risk differences of TC (aRDs) with 95% CIs using weighted Kaplan-Meier survival functions, and adjusted HRs using weighted Cox models.

Results: We included 73 388 new users in the GLP-1RA versus SGLT-2i cohort (mean age 72.4 years, men: 48.3%) and 106 274 in the DPP-4i versus SGLT-2i cohort (mean age 74.6 years, men: 44.9%). At 3 years and a median duration of treatment of 0.82-1.15 years, the aRD for GLP-1RA versus SGLT-2i for TC was -23 per 10 000 (95% CI: -51 to 4) and the aRD for DPP-4i versus SGLT-2i was -2 per 10 000 (95% CI: -17 to 13). Secondary and sensitivity analyses were consistent.

Conclusions: Our study of US Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes suggests that the initiation of incretin-based therapies may not increase the 3-year risk of TC compared with initiation of SGLT-2i. This finding offers reassurance for short-term use but does not eliminate the possibility of increased long-term or subtype-specific risks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

调查美国医疗保险受益人糖尿病患者中以肠促胰岛素为基础的治疗与甲状腺癌发病率之间的关系。
临床前研究表明胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)与甲状腺癌(TC)之间存在潜在联系,但尚不清楚这种风险是否转化为人类。研究设计和方法:我们估计了以肠促胰岛素为基础的治疗(GLP-1RA和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i))与钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)对美国老年2型糖尿病患者TC发病率的比较效果。我们将TC定义为甲状腺切除术后90天内甲状腺恶性肿瘤≥2个单独诊断代码。我们使用加权Kaplan-Meier生存函数估计校正后的TC (aRDs) 3年累积风险差异(95% ci),并使用加权Cox模型校正hr。结果:我们在GLP-1RA与SGLT-2i队列中纳入了73 388名新用户(平均年龄72.4岁,男性:48.3%),在DPP-4i与SGLT-2i队列中纳入了106 274名新用户(平均年龄74.6岁,男性:44.9%)。在治疗3年,中位持续时间为0.82-1.15年时,GLP-1RA与SGLT-2i治疗TC的aRD为-23 / 10000 (95% CI: -51 -4), DPP-4i与SGLT-2i的aRD为-2 / 10000 (95% CI: -17 - 13)。二级分析和敏感性分析结果一致。结论:我们对患有2型糖尿病的美国医疗保险受益人的研究表明,与开始使用SGLT-2i相比,开始使用基于肠促胰岛素的治疗可能不会增加3年TC的风险。这一发现为短期使用提供了保证,但并不能消除长期或特定亚型风险增加的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信