{"title":"Virtual reality interventions to reduce social isolation in older adults: a protocol for systematic review.","authors":"Ravi Shankar, Fiona Devi, Qian Xu","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness are prevalent among older adults and associated with negative health outcomes. Virtual reality (VR) interventions have emerged as a potential approach to address this problem, but their effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the effects of VR interventions on social isolation and loneliness in adults aged 60 years and older.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus from inception to February 2025 for randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and before-after studies that evaluate VR interventions compared with usual care, wait-list, no treatment or other active interventions in older adults. The primary outcomes will be measures of social isolation and loneliness assessed with validated scales. Secondary outcomes will include depression, quality of life, cognitive function, physical function and adverse events. Two reviewers will independently screen, select and extract data from studies. Risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 for randomised trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. If feasible, meta-analysis will be performed; otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. The quality of evidence will be assessed using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as it will only include published data. The review findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42025637230.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e100830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100830","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Social isolation and loneliness are prevalent among older adults and associated with negative health outcomes. Virtual reality (VR) interventions have emerged as a potential approach to address this problem, but their effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the effects of VR interventions on social isolation and loneliness in adults aged 60 years and older.
Methods and analysis: We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus from inception to February 2025 for randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and before-after studies that evaluate VR interventions compared with usual care, wait-list, no treatment or other active interventions in older adults. The primary outcomes will be measures of social isolation and loneliness assessed with validated scales. Secondary outcomes will include depression, quality of life, cognitive function, physical function and adverse events. Two reviewers will independently screen, select and extract data from studies. Risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 for randomised trials and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. If feasible, meta-analysis will be performed; otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. The quality of evidence will be assessed using GRADE.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as it will only include published data. The review findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
社会孤立和孤独在老年人中普遍存在,并与负面健康结果相关。虚拟现实(VR)干预已成为解决这一问题的潜在方法,但其有效性尚不清楚。本系统综述旨在综合有关VR干预对60岁及以上成年人社会隔离和孤独感影响的证据。方法和分析:我们将检索PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO和Scopus从成立到2025年2月的随机对照试验,准实验研究和前后研究,将VR干预与常规护理,等候名单,无治疗或其他老年人积极干预进行比较。主要结果将是社会隔离和孤独感的测量,用有效的量表进行评估。次要结果包括抑郁、生活质量、认知功能、身体功能和不良事件。两名审稿人将独立筛选、选择和提取研究数据。对随机试验使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2,对非随机研究使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。如果可行,将进行meta分析;否则,将进行叙事综合。证据质量将使用GRADE进行评估。伦理和传播:本系统评价不需要伦理批准,因为它只包括已发表的数据。审查结果将通过同行评议的出版物和会议报告进行传播。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42025637230。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.