Improving staff enjoyment at work in a community mental health team: a quality improvement project.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emily Greenslade, Iona Gray, Jennifer Perry
{"title":"Improving staff enjoyment at work in a community mental health team: a quality improvement project.","authors":"Emily Greenslade, Iona Gray, Jennifer Perry","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Staffing has been a significant problem for our community rehabilitation team in the past with high vacancy rates, sickness and turnover, impacting negatively on patient care at times. Our project aim was to improve staff enjoyment at work, in the hope that this might also improve staff retention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We measured enjoyment levels by distributing an anonymous questionnaire weekly at team meetings, scoring enjoyment levels on a scale 1-10 and collecting qualitative feedback. We also calculated monthly staffing levels. The team developed a driver diagram and interventions were introduced from this including reflective practice sessions, monthly teaching sessions, staff social events and a cross-cover/duty policy with guidance on flexible working.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the interventions were implemented, the median staff enjoyment score increased slightly from 6.75/10 to 7/10 and the median staffing levels increased from 61% to 89% over a period of 18 months. We found that staffing levels and enjoyment levels correlated with each other. From analysis of the qualitative feedback over the duration of the project, the number of negative comments received did reduce. It should be noted that the number of comments around the intensity of workload remained the same when comparing the baseline period to the final weeks of the project.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was little change in staff enjoyment levels at work. This may be reflective of the general state of the National Health Service with poor levels of morale nationally but may also be linked to ongoing concerns in the qualitative feedback from the team about high workloads. Despite this, we made positive changes and the project helped bring the team together. The project further emphasises the link between staffing levels and enjoyment levels. Overall, our project helped to increase staffing levels and highlight the importance of well-being in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staffing has been a significant problem for our community rehabilitation team in the past with high vacancy rates, sickness and turnover, impacting negatively on patient care at times. Our project aim was to improve staff enjoyment at work, in the hope that this might also improve staff retention.

Method: We measured enjoyment levels by distributing an anonymous questionnaire weekly at team meetings, scoring enjoyment levels on a scale 1-10 and collecting qualitative feedback. We also calculated monthly staffing levels. The team developed a driver diagram and interventions were introduced from this including reflective practice sessions, monthly teaching sessions, staff social events and a cross-cover/duty policy with guidance on flexible working.

Results: After the interventions were implemented, the median staff enjoyment score increased slightly from 6.75/10 to 7/10 and the median staffing levels increased from 61% to 89% over a period of 18 months. We found that staffing levels and enjoyment levels correlated with each other. From analysis of the qualitative feedback over the duration of the project, the number of negative comments received did reduce. It should be noted that the number of comments around the intensity of workload remained the same when comparing the baseline period to the final weeks of the project.

Conclusion: There was little change in staff enjoyment levels at work. This may be reflective of the general state of the National Health Service with poor levels of morale nationally but may also be linked to ongoing concerns in the qualitative feedback from the team about high workloads. Despite this, we made positive changes and the project helped bring the team together. The project further emphasises the link between staffing levels and enjoyment levels. Overall, our project helped to increase staffing levels and highlight the importance of well-being in the workplace.

提高社区精神健康小组员工的工作乐趣:一项质素改善计划。
背景:人员配备一直是我们社区康复团队的一个重大问题,在过去,由于高空缺率,疾病和流动率,有时会对患者护理产生负面影响。我们的项目目标是提高员工在工作中的乐趣,希望这也能提高员工的保留率。方法:我们通过每周在团队会议上分发一份匿名问卷,在1-10的范围内对享受程度进行评分,并收集定性反馈来测量享受程度。我们还计算了每月的人员配备水平。团队开发了一个驱动图,并引入了干预措施,包括反思练习会议、每月教学会议、员工社交活动和灵活工作指导的交叉覆盖/职责政策。结果:干预措施实施后,员工享受得分中位数在18个月的时间里从6.75/10略微上升到7/10,员工水平中位数从61%上升到89%。我们发现人员配备水平和享受程度是相互关联的。通过对项目期间的定性反馈的分析,收到的负面评论的数量确实减少了。应该注意的是,当将基线期与项目的最后几周进行比较时,围绕工作量强度的评论数量保持不变。结论:员工工作享受水平变化不大。这可能反映了国民保健服务的总体状况,全国士气低落,但也可能与小组对高工作量的定性反馈中持续存在的担忧有关。尽管如此,我们还是做出了积极的改变,这个项目帮助团队团结起来。该项目进一步强调了人员配备水平与享受水平之间的联系。总的来说,我们的项目有助于提高员工水平,并强调工作场所健康的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信