Double-Guide Catheter “Criss-Cross” Technique and Left Main Bifurcation Rotational Atherectomy

Q4 Medicine
Giuseppe Colletti MD , Tim Noterdaeme MD , Laura Peter MD , Agostino Spanò MD , Marouane Boukhris MD , Amine Mamoun Boutaleb MD , Alexandre Natalis MD , Adrien Jossart MD , Olivier Gach MD, PhD , Claudiu Ungureanu MD
{"title":"Double-Guide Catheter “Criss-Cross” Technique and Left Main Bifurcation Rotational Atherectomy","authors":"Giuseppe Colletti MD ,&nbsp;Tim Noterdaeme MD ,&nbsp;Laura Peter MD ,&nbsp;Agostino Spanò MD ,&nbsp;Marouane Boukhris MD ,&nbsp;Amine Mamoun Boutaleb MD ,&nbsp;Alexandre Natalis MD ,&nbsp;Adrien Jossart MD ,&nbsp;Olivier Gach MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Claudiu Ungureanu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.105336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rotational atherectomy of severely calcified left main (LM) bifurcation lesions can be hazardous, especially when maintaining a protective guidewire in one branch is mandatory.</div></div><div><h3>Case Summary</h3><div>An 82-year-old man underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified LM bifurcation using a double-guide catheter “criss-cross” technique to reduce periprocedural ischemia and iatrogenic dissection risk associated with a single larger catheter. Rotational atherectomy was safely performed on a tight proximo-ostial circumflex lesion while retaining a protective guidewire in the dissected left anterior descending artery.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Although protective microcatheters have been described, bench studies show consistent microcatheter damage, risk of nonorganic material embolization, and problematic guidewire interactions. Proper positioning of guide catheters modifies wire bias, improving guidewire separation and minimizing burr-wire interactions. Bench testing confirmed this advantage.</div></div><div><h3>Take-Home Messages</h3><div>The novel double-guide catheter criss-cross technique potentially increases safety in complex calcified proximo-ostial LM lesions by reducing guidewire interactions. Modification of wire bias could extend to all proximo-ostial coronary lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14792,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Case reports","volume":"30 31","pages":"Article 105336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666084925021187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rotational atherectomy of severely calcified left main (LM) bifurcation lesions can be hazardous, especially when maintaining a protective guidewire in one branch is mandatory.

Case Summary

An 82-year-old man underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified LM bifurcation using a double-guide catheter “criss-cross” technique to reduce periprocedural ischemia and iatrogenic dissection risk associated with a single larger catheter. Rotational atherectomy was safely performed on a tight proximo-ostial circumflex lesion while retaining a protective guidewire in the dissected left anterior descending artery.

Discussion

Although protective microcatheters have been described, bench studies show consistent microcatheter damage, risk of nonorganic material embolization, and problematic guidewire interactions. Proper positioning of guide catheters modifies wire bias, improving guidewire separation and minimizing burr-wire interactions. Bench testing confirmed this advantage.

Take-Home Messages

The novel double-guide catheter criss-cross technique potentially increases safety in complex calcified proximo-ostial LM lesions by reducing guidewire interactions. Modification of wire bias could extend to all proximo-ostial coronary lesions.
双导导管“交叉”技术与左主干分叉旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术
背景:严重钙化左主干(LM)分叉病变的旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术可能是危险的,特别是当强制在一个分支维持保护性导丝时。病例总结:一名82岁男性采用双导管“交叉”技术成功行钙化LM分叉的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,以减少术中缺血和医源性夹层风险。旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术对紧致的近口旋转病变安全进行,同时在剥离的左前降支中保留保护性导丝。尽管已经描述了保护性微导管,但实验研究显示微导管的损伤、非有机物质栓塞的风险以及导丝相互作用的问题。导尿管的正确定位可以改变导丝偏置,改善导丝分离,减少毛刺与导丝的相互作用。台架测试证实了这一优势。新型双导导管交叉技术通过减少导丝相互作用,潜在地提高了复杂钙化近口LM病变的安全性。导线偏置矫正可扩展至所有近口冠状动脉病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Case reports
JACC. Case reports Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
404
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信