Impact of patient death on physicians’ mental health

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Brahim El Kinany, Sarah Belarabi, Ferdaouss Qassimi, Amine Bout, Chadya Aarab, Rachid Aalouane
{"title":"Impact of patient death on physicians’ mental health","authors":"Brahim El Kinany,&nbsp;Sarah Belarabi,&nbsp;Ferdaouss Qassimi,&nbsp;Amine Bout,&nbsp;Chadya Aarab,&nbsp;Rachid Aalouane","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Physicians often encounter stressful situations that can impact their mental well-being. The death of a patient represents one of the most difficult situations in routine medical practice. Literature notably lacks comprehensive studies into physicians’ personal experiences with patients’ deaths. However, it does underscore heightened levels of sorrow, guilt, and stress stemming from the passing of terminally ill patients. As a majority of studies in this realm adopt qualitative methodologies, there is merit in supplementing existing research with a quantitative approach that employs validated psychometric scales. Furthermore, the study of phenomena associated with stress, particularly the perceived professional support by physicians in stressful events, can contribute to the implementation of preventive measures to help physicians cope.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our study aims to measure the traumatic impact on resident and intern physicians at national university hospitals following the death of patients, as well as to assess the perceived level of professional support among these physicians.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study. Participants included interns and residents from various specialties (medical, surgical and laboratory) at national university hospitals in Morocco. Assessing the traumatic impact of patients’ death on doctors was conducted using two psychometric scales: the Peri-Traumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and the Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R). Additionally, we used the Perceived Professional Social Support Scale (QSSP-P) to evaluate how supportive the professional environment was towards these doctors. All scales utilized in the study are validated in the French language.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 96 participants, with 67.7% being female. The average age was 26.8 years, ranging from 23 to 39 years. The majority of participants managed more than nine patients simultaneously (58.3%) while 41.7% were scheduled for more than six 24<!--> <span>h shifts per month. During their training, over 64.6% of interns and residents faced more than ten patients’ death incidents, and 68.8% considered their first patient death as the most traumatizing. Half of the physicians evaluated the patients’ care as moderately appropriate, with 46.9% believing that the incident could have been prevented. Notably, 70.8% of interns and residents involved in patient care experienced self-blame and attributed a share of responsibility to themselves for the patient's demise. The majority of participants, 82.3%, exhibited peri-traumatic distress with a PDI score exceeding 15. Among the studied factors, only the perceived responsibility and a management system centered on a single physician (rather than a team) demonstrated a noteworthy correlation with PDI scores. The mean score on the IES-R scale was 25.6, with almost half of the sample (54.2%) reporting moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. The severity of these symptoms was significantly correlated with higher age, high number of patient's deaths experienced and the physician's perceived sense of responsibility. Participants in our study were more satisfied with support from colleagues compared to support functions (paramedical staff, administrative officials) or superiors. Moreover, only colleagues’ support was statistically significantly associated with low scores on the traumatic impact scales.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physicians maintain a unique relationship and therapeutic alliance with their patients. Therefore, the death of a patient can have a significant psychological impact on the physician. This study allowed us to objectively measure this psychological impact and evaluate professional support. The results of these studies encourage further exploration of the issue and the implementation of measures to reduce this psychological impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":"183 8","pages":"Pages 829-834"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448724003275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Physicians often encounter stressful situations that can impact their mental well-being. The death of a patient represents one of the most difficult situations in routine medical practice. Literature notably lacks comprehensive studies into physicians’ personal experiences with patients’ deaths. However, it does underscore heightened levels of sorrow, guilt, and stress stemming from the passing of terminally ill patients. As a majority of studies in this realm adopt qualitative methodologies, there is merit in supplementing existing research with a quantitative approach that employs validated psychometric scales. Furthermore, the study of phenomena associated with stress, particularly the perceived professional support by physicians in stressful events, can contribute to the implementation of preventive measures to help physicians cope.

Objective

Our study aims to measure the traumatic impact on resident and intern physicians at national university hospitals following the death of patients, as well as to assess the perceived level of professional support among these physicians.

Materials and methods

We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study. Participants included interns and residents from various specialties (medical, surgical and laboratory) at national university hospitals in Morocco. Assessing the traumatic impact of patients’ death on doctors was conducted using two psychometric scales: the Peri-Traumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and the Revised Impact of Event Scale (IES-R). Additionally, we used the Perceived Professional Social Support Scale (QSSP-P) to evaluate how supportive the professional environment was towards these doctors. All scales utilized in the study are validated in the French language.

Results

The study included 96 participants, with 67.7% being female. The average age was 26.8 years, ranging from 23 to 39 years. The majority of participants managed more than nine patients simultaneously (58.3%) while 41.7% were scheduled for more than six 24 h shifts per month. During their training, over 64.6% of interns and residents faced more than ten patients’ death incidents, and 68.8% considered their first patient death as the most traumatizing. Half of the physicians evaluated the patients’ care as moderately appropriate, with 46.9% believing that the incident could have been prevented. Notably, 70.8% of interns and residents involved in patient care experienced self-blame and attributed a share of responsibility to themselves for the patient's demise. The majority of participants, 82.3%, exhibited peri-traumatic distress with a PDI score exceeding 15. Among the studied factors, only the perceived responsibility and a management system centered on a single physician (rather than a team) demonstrated a noteworthy correlation with PDI scores. The mean score on the IES-R scale was 25.6, with almost half of the sample (54.2%) reporting moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. The severity of these symptoms was significantly correlated with higher age, high number of patient's deaths experienced and the physician's perceived sense of responsibility. Participants in our study were more satisfied with support from colleagues compared to support functions (paramedical staff, administrative officials) or superiors. Moreover, only colleagues’ support was statistically significantly associated with low scores on the traumatic impact scales.

Conclusion

Physicians maintain a unique relationship and therapeutic alliance with their patients. Therefore, the death of a patient can have a significant psychological impact on the physician. This study allowed us to objectively measure this psychological impact and evaluate professional support. The results of these studies encourage further exploration of the issue and the implementation of measures to reduce this psychological impact.
病人死亡对医生心理健康的影响
医生经常会遇到影响他们心理健康的压力情况。病人死亡是日常医疗实践中最困难的情况之一。文献明显缺乏对医生与病人死亡的个人经历的全面研究。然而,它确实强调了因临终病人的去世而加剧的悲伤、内疚和压力。由于这一领域的大多数研究采用定性方法,因此采用经过验证的心理测量量表来补充现有研究的定量方法是有价值的。此外,研究与压力有关的现象,特别是医生在压力事件中所感受到的专业支持,可以有助于实施预防措施,帮助医生应对。目的本研究旨在测量患者死亡后对国立大学医院住院医师和实习医师的创伤性影响,并评估这些医师对专业支持的感知水平。材料和方法我们进行了一项全国性的横断面、描述性和分析性研究。参加者包括来自摩洛哥国立大学医院各专业(内科、外科和化验室)的实习生和住院医生。采用两种心理测量量表:创伤后痛苦量表(PDI)和修订事件影响量表(IES-R)来评估患者死亡对医生的创伤性影响。此外,我们使用感知专业社会支持量表(QSSP-P)来评估专业环境对这些医生的支持程度。研究中使用的所有量表均以法语进行验证。结果共纳入96名参与者,其中67.7%为女性。平均年龄26.8岁,23 ~ 39岁不等。大多数参与者同时管理超过9名患者(58.3%),而41.7%的参与者每月安排超过6次24小时轮班。超过64.6%的实习医师和住院医师在培训过程中遇到过10次以上的患者死亡事件,68.8%的实习医师和住院医师认为他们的第一次患者死亡是最具创伤的。一半的医生认为病人的护理是适度的,46.9%的医生认为这一事件是可以预防的。值得注意的是,参与病人护理的实习生和住院医生中,有70.8%的人经历过自责,并将病人的死亡归咎于自己。大多数参与者(82.3%)表现出创伤后应激障碍,PDI评分超过15分。在研究的因素中,只有感知责任和以单个医生(而不是团队)为中心的管理系统与PDI得分有显著的相关性。IES-R量表的平均得分为25.6分,几乎一半的样本(54.2%)报告中度至重度PTSD症状。这些症状的严重程度与患者的年龄、死亡人数和医生的责任感显著相关。本研究的参与者对同事的支持比对支持职能(辅助医务人员、行政官员)或上级的支持更满意。此外,只有同事的支持与创伤影响量表的低得分有统计学显著相关。结论医师与患者保持着独特的关系和治疗联盟。因此,病人的死亡会对医生产生重大的心理影响。这项研究使我们能够客观地衡量这种心理影响并评估专业支持。这些研究的结果鼓励进一步探讨这个问题,并采取措施减少这种心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信